JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 150-153.doi: 胆总管结石行腹腔镜下胆总管探查术后-胆总管压力变化的研究

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the changes of common bile duct pressure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with common bile duct stones

  

  1. Department of Pancreatic Surgery,Renmin Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
  • Received:2024-01-24 Accepted:2024-01-24 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-20

Abstract: Objective To study the change of common bile duct pressure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with common bile duct stones.Methods Clinical data of 17 patients with common bile duct stones treated in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2022 were collected. All patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and common bile duct pressure measurement. The patients were followed up for 8 weeks after operation, and the common bile duct pressure was measured by indwelling T tube at 2, 3, 4 and 8 weeks.Results Among the 17 patients, 1 patient showed persistent high common bile duct pressure due to residual common bile duct stones. In the remaining 16 patients, there were no significant difference between the initial common bile duct pressure (19.7 cm H2O) and the common bile duct pressure at postoperative (17.0 cm H2O) and week 1 (15.5 cm H2O) (P> 0.05). There were significant differences between the initial common bile duct pressure and the common bile duct pressure at week 2 (13.5 cm H2O), 3 (12.2 cm H2O), 4 (11.1 cm H2O) and 8 (10.0 cm H2O) (P < 0.05).Conclusion Compared to initial common bile duct pressure,the pressure of common bile duct began to decrease significantly from 2 weeks after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with common bile duct stones.

Key words: common bile duct stones, common bile duct pressure, common bile duct exploration

Viewed
Full text
58
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 58

  From Others local
  Times 5 53
  Rate 9% 91%

Abstract
52
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 52
  From Others local
  Times 51 1
  Rate 98% 2%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 796 .