JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1050-1054.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.10.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correlation between LncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR and prognosis of triple negative breast cancer

CHENG Yuanyuan*,HUANG Xiaoling   

  1. *Department of Breast Surgery,Linfen Central Hospital,Linfen 041000,China
  • Received:2023-09-07 Online:2024-11-07 Published:2024-11-07

Abstract: Objective To explore the relationship between long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) non-coding repressor of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NRON),long non-coding RNA small NF90-associated RNA (snaR) and the prognosis of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).Methods From February 2018 to February 2020,100 TNBC patients accepted by our hospital were collected,and their tumor and adjacent tissues were taken during surgery.Based on the 3-year follow-up prognosis,they were separated into a good prognosis group(72 cases) and a poor prognosis group(28 cases).Real-time quantitative fluorescent PCR (RT-qPCR) method was applied to detect the expression levels of lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR in tumor tissue and adjacent tissues.Pearson method was applied to analyze the correlation between lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR in tumor tissue of TNBC patients.Multivariate Cox regression was applied to analyze the prognostic factors of TNBC patients.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the prognostic value of lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR expression levels in tumor tissue of TNBC patients.Results Compared with adjacent tissues,the level of lncRNA NRON in tumor tissues of TNBC patients obviously decreased (1.01±0.10 vs 0.65±0.08,P<0.001),while the level of lncRNA snaR obviously increased (1.03±0.13 vs 2.42±0.30,P<0.001).The expression levels of lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR were related to TNM staging and tumor differentiation (P<0.05).Compared with the good prognosis group,the level of lncRNA NRON in tumor tissue of TNBC patients in poor prognosis group obviously decreased (0.69±0.09 vs 0.55±0.05,P<0.001),while the level of lncRNA snaR obviously increased (2.28±0.26比2.78±0.40,P<0.001).Pearson method analysis showed that there was a negative correlation between lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR expression levels in tumor tissue of TNBC patients (r=-0.617,P<0.001).Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lncRNA NRON was a protective factor for the prognosis of TNBC patients (P<0.05),LncRNA snaR was a risk factor for the prognosis of TNBC patients (P<0.05).The combination of lncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR expression levels in predicting better prognosis in TNBC patients than lncRNA snaR alone (Zcombination-lncRNA snaR=3.200,P=0.001).Conclusion The level of lncRNA NRON is down-regulated and lncRNA snaR level is obviously up-regulated in tumor tissues of TNBC patients,they are related to the prognosis of TNBC patients and may be biomarkers for evaluating TNBC prognosis.

Key words: long non-coding RNA non-coding repressor of nuclear factor of activated T cells; long non-coding RNA small NF90-associated RNA; triple negative breast cancer; prognosis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text
159
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 159

  From Others local
  Times 1 158
  Rate 1% 99%

Abstract
117
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 117
  From Others
  Times 117
  Rate 100%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!