Abstract: Objective To introduce a new method of totally implantable venous access ports(TIVAP)  via cephalic vein venotomy.(CVV-Port).Methods The clinical and follow-up data of 32 patients who received TIVAP from October 2019 to December 2020 were summarized and analyzed. During the same period, the 47 patients who underwent CVV-Port were compared and analyzed in terms of operation time and complications.Results 28 patients received TIVAP successfully , the average operation time was (25.93±4.77)min, while the CCV-port group was (28.73±5.16)min, with no statistical difference (p＜0.05). There was no thrombosis in the TIVAP group, and thrombosis in the CCV-port group in 13 cases, the difference was significant (p＜0.05). Catheterization related adverse events were 1 case in TIVAP group and 3 cases in CCV-port group. There were statistically significant differences in the increase of treatment time and treatment cost between the two groups [0 vs.(16.7±2.1)d; 0 vs.(1233±166.7)yuan, both p＜0.05].Conclusion TIVAP via cephalic vein section does not increase the operation time and has fewer complications.

Key words: totally implantable venous-access ports, cephalic vein venotomy, new methods, clinical practice