JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 844-847.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.09.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effect study of abdominal wall puncture suture needle assisted self-made single hole device in appendectomy

  

  1. Department of General Surgery,Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital,the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,Jiangsu,Nanjing 210046, China
  • Received:2021-12-02 Accepted:2021-12-02 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-14

Abstract: Objective To study the clinical effect of a self-made single-hole device assisted by abdominal wall puncture suture needle in appendectomy.Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy admitted to the Department of General Surgery,Taikang Xianlin Drum Tower Hospital,the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,from July 2018 to July 2021,36 of them were self-made with abdominal wall puncture needles.Single-port device treatment(puncture needle group),44 cases were treated with traditional three-port laparoscopic treatment(traditional group),the operation time,blood loss,anal exhaust time,hospital stay,pain score and postoperative wound infection were compared between the two groups Situation and other indicators. Results There was no significant difference between the puncture needle group and traditional group of patients in terms of median operative time(35min vs.35min),median blood loss(12.5ml vs.15ml),median anal exhaust time(1 day vs.1 day),median hospital stay(5 days vs.5 days) and postoperative wound infection(0 case vs.2 cases)(P>0.05).The puncture needle group had significantly lower pain scores[3(2,3)] than the traditional[3(2,4)] on the first postoperative day(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of abdominal wall puncture suture needle to assist self-made single-hole device for appendectomy is safe and effective.Postoperative pain is significantly improved,hospitalization time is short,postoperative scars are small,and more beautiful.

Key words: abdominal wall puncture and suture needle, self-made single port laparoscope, appendectomy

[1] . Curative effect analysis of laparoscopic surgical treatment for root gangrenous perforative appendicitis  [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 570-571.
[2] CHEN Xiaobao, LI Mingwu, LIU Siyi.. Clinical value of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of suspected acute appendicitis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(4): 347-349.
[3] ZOU Laibin, HE Tian, CHEN Liang, et al.. Clinical effect of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in the treatment of acute gangrenous appendicitis with root perforation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(12): 1147-1149.
[4] . Application of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy in acute appendicitis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(11): 1028-1031.
[5] SUN Jingqiu, ZHU Congyuan, WANG Ke, et al.. A comparative study of three different trocar positions in laparoscopic appendectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(12): 1037-1040.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 789 .