JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 666-669.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.07.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Therapeutic effect of three surgical positions on traumatic intertrochanteric fracture of femur

  

  1. Department of Orthopaedics,the First College of Clinical Medical Science,China Three Gorges University,hubei,Yichang 443000, China
  • Received:2021-12-24 Accepted:2021-12-24 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-07-20

Abstract: Objective  To explore the efficacy of three surgical postures in the treatment of traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 98 patients with traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated in our hospital from February 2017 to June 2020 were selected.According to different surgical positions,they were divided into lithotomy position group(33 cases),supine position group(33 cases) and lateral position group(32 cases).The three groups were treated with Asian proximal femoral anti rotation intramedullary nail.The operation related indexes,excellent and good rate of hip function,pain,anxiety and complications were compared. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding and fracture healing time among the three groups(P>0.05).The placement time,operation time and fluoroscopy time of lithotomy position group were shorter than those of Supine position group and lateral lying position group(P<0.05).During the follow-up at 6 months after operation,the excellent and good rate in the lateral position group(90.63%) was higher than that in the lithotomy group(84.85%) and supine group(72.73%),but there was no significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).Compared with the same group before operation, the VAS scores of the three groups were significantly improved at 3 days and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores before and after operation among the three groups (P>0.05).However,  the score of Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS score) of the three groups had statistical significance in 30 minutes (P<0.05), and the supine position group and lateral position group were higher than the lithotomy position group (P<0.05).The short-term complications in the three groups were 6.06%,9.09% and 6.06%,respectively,and the long-term complications were 3.03%,6.06% and 3.13%,respectively.There was no significant difference in the short-term and long-term complications among the three groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Lithotomy position,Supine position and lateral decubitus position are effective in the treatment of traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fracture,with better recovery of hip function,less pain and fewer complications.However,the lithotomy position is helpful to reduce the injury to doctors and patients and patients' anxiety caused by repeated fluoroscopy,so as to shorten the operation time.

Key words: ithotomy position, supine position, lateral position, intertrochanteric fracture of femur, hip function, complication

[1] GUO Dekai, LIU Lei, MA Ruirui, et al. Discussion of pancreatoduodenectomy in older patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[2] MA Xiangyu, WANG Wenge, WU Jianlin, et al. Application of double-action total hip prosthesis and total hip replacement in the treatment of traumatic femoral neck fractures [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 662-665.
[3] LIU Cuiping, YANG Jun, ZHANG Weitong, et al. Comparative study between laparoscopy and laparotomy operation in the treatment of multiple magnetic foreign body ingestion in children [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(5): 483-485.
[4] CHEN Yongjie, LIU Wei, TAO Pengfei, et al. Acute cervical epidural hematoma and esophageal perforation after cervical spinal surgery:report of a case and review of the Literature [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 269-271.
[5] CHEN Geng, SHE Li, WANG Jian. Clinical efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of prostate in the treatment of BPH with urinary retention [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 126-129.
[6] CHEN Jianxin, LIN Ming, JIN Wenhai. Analysis of Clavien-Dindo classification of complications and impact factors after laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 171-174.
[7] GUAN Yan, HE Linyu, LUO Yin. Construction and validation of risk prediction model for infectious complications after hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 182-185.
[8] JIANG Jingcheng, ZHANG Chao, WANG Han, et al.. Clinical observation on the effect of optimizing the operation process on autogenous cranioplasty [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(9): 821-823.
[9] WU Hao, YU Ting, LI Lin, et al.. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization reduced vascular injury,complication and enhanced recovery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(9): 889-891.
[10] . Application of mediastinal vacuum drainage tube in the resection of esophageal carcinoma by the right chest [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 714-716.
[11] . Application research of right hemihepatectomy by liverhangingmaneuver anterior approach in liver cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[12] . Autogenous pericardium for reconstruction of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary artery of PA/VSD in infants [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(6): 508-511.
[13] . Logistic regression analysis of shortterm and midterm outcomes and risk factors of complications between hybrid operation and Bracket Elephant trunk technique for complex type B aortic dissection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(6): 526-529.
[14] . Value analysis of controlled nutritional status score in predicting adverse outcomes after cardiopulmonary bypass [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(6): 534-537.
[15] . Influence of placement of gastric tube and no gastric tube after thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer on complications [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(6): 538-541.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 792 .