JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 920-921.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10056483.2018.12.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison study of ligation and Hem-o-lok in securing of appendix stump in laparoscopic appendectomy

  

  • Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20

Abstract: Objective〖WTBZ〗〓To compare ligation and Hemolok in securing of appendix stump in laparoscopic  appendectomy.〖WTHZ〗Methods〖WTBZ〗〓There were 105 patients undergoing  laparoscopic appendectomy.They were treated by two different methods in securing of the base of the appendix:silk ligation of the stump was performed in 53 cases(ligation group); while stump ligation by using Hemolok clips was performed in 52 cases(Hemlock group).Two groups were compared in operation time and postoperative patient recovery.〖WTHZ〗Results〖WTBZ〗〓Between the both groups,postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences(P>0.05).The operation time of the ligation group was (55.5±7.8)min,which was significantly longer than that of the Hemolok group[(46.1±5.6)min,(P<0.05)].The cost of appendix root treatment in the ligation group was 0.3 yuan,while the cost in Hemolok group was 560 yuan.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖WTBZ〗〓Both methods are safe and effective in securing of the base of the appendix in laparoscopic appendectomy.Pursestring suture is more in line with traditional appendectomy requirements and cost effective,but requiring more skilled laparoscopic manipulation.Hemolok clipping of the appendix saves operation time and is easy to perform,which is more suitable for beginners.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 785 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 831 .