JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 627-629.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.06.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The relationship between the angle of lower common bile duct and postoperative pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for beginners

  

  1. Department of General Surgery,Affiliated Central Hospital of Shenyang Medical College,Shenyang 110000,China
  • Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-07-20

Abstract: Objective To explore if the angle of distal common bile duct is the risk factors for PEP in beginner endoscopists without supervision.
Methods We studied a retrospective analysis of 65 patients who were perfomed ERCP from the beginner endoscopists,Patients were Classified as acute(angle≤30°)and obtuse(angle>30°).The angle of the distal common bile duct(CBD) was measured as the angle between the lower wall of the bile duct and a vertical line on coronal view CT.Time of cannulation,The rate of pancreatic duct cannulation,Hyperamylasemia and PEP were compared between two groups.
Results ERCP success rate was 91.1 % in the acute angle group and 96.8% in the obtuse group.The cannulation time was angle group(10.05±2.67)min vs(9.35±2.79)min.The ratio of pancreatic duct cannulation was acute 50% than obtuse 32.2% angle group,Hyperamylasemia was acute 20.6%,obtuse 19.4%.The rate of PEP was acute(26.5%) than obtuse(3.22%) angle group(P = 0.018).No other severe complications(bleeding and perforation) were happened(P<0.05).
Conclusion Obtuse distal CBD angle may have lower risk of PEP when beginner endoscopists performing ERCP.

Key words: endoscopic retrograde pancreatic cholangiopancreatography, beginner endoscopists, post ercp pancreatitis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text
489
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 489

  From Others local
  Times 22 467
  Rate 4% 96%

Abstract
345
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 345
  From Others
  Times 345
  Rate 100%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 910 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 946 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 954 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(12): 957 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 262 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 349 -0 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 362 -0 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(5): 384 -0 .