JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1211-1214.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240115

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of multifunctional and traditional internal stents in patients with total ureteral resection cutaneous stomy

  

  1. Urology Department,Tongji University Affiliated Tongji Hospital,Shanghai 200065,China
  • Received:2024-01-20 Accepted:2024-01-20 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-20

Abstract: Objective  To compare the application of multifunctional ureterostomy stent and traditional ureterostomy internal stent in patients with total ureterostomy.Methods  Prospectively,102 patients with bladder cancer and undergoing elective radical cystectomy with urinary diversion admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2023 were selected for the study.According to the random number rank method,the patients were divided into the study group (51 cases) and the control group (51 cases).The control group was given a traditional singleJ ureteral stomy stent drainage device,and the research group was given a multifunctional ureteral stomy stent drainage device.The differences of OAI score,renal function index (eGFR),recent complications,long-term complications and quality of life (FACT-BL score) were compared between the two groups.Results  OAI scores 1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery (study group:49.33±4.07,57.29±3.90,68.25±3.76;control group:44.25±4.61,52.31±4.58,59.06±4.37) and before surgery (study group:32.71±4.32;control group:33.18±4.74) compared with higher levels (P<0.05),but the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).Repeated measurement ANOVA results showed that eGFR at 3 months and 6 months after surgery (study group:86.07±4.07,88.01±3.01;control group:83.09±3.06,85.06±5.09) and before surgery (study group:82.05±6.04;control group:81.03±5.06) compared with higher levels (P<0.05),but the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).The total rate of recent complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (7.84% VS 23.53%,P<0.05).The total incidence of long-term complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group (43.14% VS 78.43%,P<0.05).Emotional status score,physical status score,functional status score,social and family status score,BSS score,FACT-BL total score of the two groups 6 months after surgery (study group:20.25±2.36,24.92±1.87,25.65±1.11,26.02±1.14,32.75±1.76,129.59±5.74;Control group:18.65±3.10,20.18±3.02,23.51±1.29,21.51±2.24,30.26±3.07,114.10±10.37) and preoperative (study group:14.27±3.56,16.57±3.58,17.27±2.35,17.49±2.64,23.41±5.25,89.02±13.62;Control group:14.39±3.44,16.47±3.25,17.22±2.34,17.55±2.59,23.43±5.25,89.25±13.62) were increased (P<0.05),and the study group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion  The application of multifunctional ureteral stent in patients with ureteral cutaneous stomy with total cystotomy can effectively improve the adaptability of stomy,promote the recovery of renal function,reduce the risk of short-term and long-term complications,and improve the quality of life of patients.

Key words: radical cystectomy, ureteral cutaneous stomy, multifunctional ureterostomy stent, traditional ureterostomy stent, postoperative complications, renal function

[1] XU Zheng, LU Zilong, XIA Liming. The influence of different surgical methods on the treatment effect of female unilateral cT1N0-1a thyroid cancer and the satisfaction of incision beauty [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(5): 481-483.
[2] JIANG Xiaoye, YANG Fan, SUN Zhenye, et al. The effect of renal tumor enucleation on renal function,renal parenchyma and teratoma-derived growth factor-1 in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(6): 584-586.
[3] HE Huihu, XU Rubin, YAO Qiyang, et al. Application of transcaecal terminal ileum tube ileostomy in protecting high risk rectal anastomosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(5): 461-465.
[4] YIN Jincheng, LIU Hongxin, GU Yanqing, et al. Effect of ureteroscopic lithotripsy on renal function and inflammatory factors in patients with renal stones with diameter of 2-3cm [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(2): 133-136.
[5] DING Dashuai, LIAO Min, WANG Feng, et al. Relationship between renal pelvic drainage fluid protein level and renal function in adults with severe hydronephrosis nephrostomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(2): 122-126.
[6] DENG Tao, HE Jie. Protection of urinary function by laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma based on membrane anatomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(12): 1164-1166.
[7] TIAN Hengna, SANG Jianfeng, ZHOU Zheng. Predictive significance of serum intact parathyroid hormone and calcium in permanent hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(1): 64-67.
[8] GUO Dekai, LIU Lei, MA Ruirui, et al. Discussion of pancreatoduodenectomy in older patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[9] CHEN Jiacai, ZENG Binghua, LI Jinyu, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 stage renal cell carcinoma and its effect on renal function [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 121-124.
[10] . Application research of right hemihepatectomy by liverhangingmaneuver anterior approach in liver cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[11] . Research progress of intestinal microecology in liver transplantation [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(11): 1085-1088.
[12] . The effect of preoperative hypoalbuminemia on complications after primary hip arthroplasty [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(11): 1047-1050.
[13] . The clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery combined with acupoint application to promote the restoration of gastrointestinal peristalsis function after laparoscopic radical cystectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(5): 423-426.
[14] . Advances in radical surgery for bladder cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(11): 1005-1007.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 800 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 806 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .