JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 803-806.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.08.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of miR-27a and miR-1299 in predicting  prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer

  

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,Tangdu Hospital of Air Force Medical University,Xi’an 710000,China
  • Received:2023-07-11 Revised:2023-07-11 Accepted:2023-07-11 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-20

Abstract: Objective  To explore the clinical value of micro ribonucleic acid (miR)27a and miR-1299 in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods  A total of 89 patients with esophageal cancer in the hospital were enrolled between June 2020 and June 2022,and all underwent Minimally invasive thoracic and laparoscopic resection of esophageal cancer.The expression levels of miR-27a and miR-1299 were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before surgery,and level of serum ferritin (SF) was detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.The relationship between miR-27a,miR-1299,SF and clinicopathology in patients with esophageal cancer was analyzed.All were followed up till February 2023 after surgery,and survival of patients was record.The relationship between miR-27a,miR-1299,SF and prognosis was analyzed.The risk factors of long-term prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression model.The relationship between miR-27a,miR-1299 and serum SF was analyzed by Pearson.Results  There were significant differences in miR-27a,miR-1299 and serum SF among patients with different tumor staging,lymph node metastasis and differentiation degree (P<0.05).The results of survival analysis showed that overall survival rates in high-expression miR-27a and SF groups were lower than those in low-expression miR-27a and SF groups (P<0.05),while which was higher in high-expression miR-1299 group than low-expression miR-1299 group (P<0.05).Cox regression analysis showed that miR-27a ≥2.54,miR-1299 <4.18 and serum SF ≥223.78 μg/L (P<0.05) were independent risk factors of postoperative long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.Pearson correlation analysis showed that level of serum SF was positively correlated with relative expression level of miR-27a(P<0.05,r=0.612),while negatively correlated with relative expression level of miR-1299(P<0.05,r=-0.517).Conclusion The miR-27a,miR-1299 and serum SF are related to tumor staging,lymph node metastasis and differentiation degree in patients with esophageal cancer,which can be applied to evaluate postoperative long-term prognosis.

Key words: micro ribonucleic acid-27a, micro ribonucleic acid-1299, esophageal cancer, long-term prognosis

[1] WANG Jichao, XUE Junying, ZHANG Jianhua, YANG Jin, WANG Linpei. The effect of improved total cavity endoscopy on lung function,postoperative feeding and complications in patients with chronic lung disease of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 807-810.
[2] CHEN Hainan, LENG Xuefeng. Research Progress on Predictive Factors and Related Predictive Models for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophageal Cancer Surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(8): 892-895.
[3] WANG Qing, CHEN Lili, LIU Yupeng. Establishment and application of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 716-720.
[4] LIU Shengkai,CUI Lina,LI Junpeng,SHI Junjie,FAN Yanling. Effect of surgical approach on complications and tumor marker levels in patients undergoing radical resection of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 603-606.
[5] HUANG Xiaomei,GUO Ming,LUO Junlong,BAO Chuan’en,HU Meng. Study on the relationship between serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and insulin-like growth factor-1 and esophagogastric anastomotic fistula in patients after thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(3): 276-280.
[6] ZHAO Tianhao, ZHAO Chun. Survival prognosis of multiple malignant tumors with secondary primary esophageal cancer:a population-based analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 158-163.
[7] JIANG Fan, XIE Keqi. Impacts of butorphanol on the proliferation,apoptosis and migration of esophageal cancer cells by regulating CCL2-CCR2 axis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 168-172.
[8] CHENG Dongliang, LIN Chengyi, GUO Jialong, LIU Huasong, LIU Hua.. The influence of different cervical anastomosis methods on complications during laparoscopic esophageal cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(12): 1156-1159.
[9] XIANG Zhengkai, WANG Xiang, YAN Baoguo. Expression of miR-205 and chromosome 10 phosphatase and tensin homologous deletion gene in esophageal carcinoma and their relationship with prognosis after radical resection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(10): 943-947.
[10] TIAN Wenze, XIONG Xinkui, XU Dafu, et al. The study of conversion therapy with carrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(8): 741-743.
[11] ZHAO Shuo, DANG Chengxue, LI Wenxing, et al. Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic Leakage of esophageal cancer patients after radical esophagectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 161-164.
[12] Ming Wei, Lv Jianfa, Liu Gaoli, et al.. The safety and feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with total meso-esophageal excision for esophageal cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(9): 827-829.
[13] . Application of mediastinal vacuum drainage tube in the resection of esophageal carcinoma by the right chest [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 714-716.
[14] . Prevention of benign anastomotic stricture postesophagectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 736-737.
[15] . Current situation and prospects of jejunal conduit for esophageal reconstruction [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 788-792.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 800 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 848 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 869 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 875 .