JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 476-479.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.05.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound body surface localization combined with nano carbon tracking for sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 invasive breast cancer patients

  

  1. Department of General Surgery,Beijing Shunyi Hospital,Beijing 101300,China
  • Received:2023-05-06 Revised:2023-05-06 Accepted:2023-05-06 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-25

Abstract: Objective To compare and analyze the operation time,detection rate and detection number of sentinel lymph node(SLN) who was using contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) body surface localization combined with nano carbon tracking and single dye method for sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in patients with cN0 invasive breast cancer(IBC).To explore the feasibility of CEUS body surface localization combined with nano carbon tracking for SLNB.Methods The clinicopathological data of 199 patients with cN0 IBC who were diagnosed and treated in Beijing Shunyi District Hospital from January 1st,2018 to April 30th,2023 were collected.We divided all patients into dye method group(100 cases) and combined method group(99 cases) according to SLN missing method.In dye method group,SLNB was performed with nano carbon tracer;In combined method group,SLN was marked and located by CEUS before surgery and SLNB was performed with nano carbon tracer during surgery.Results  The detection rate of SLN in this study was 96.48%(192/199).In the dye method group,the detection rate of SLN was 95.00% and the average detection number of SLN was(2.79±1.228).while in the combination method group,the detection rate was 97.98% and the average detection number of SLN was(3.32±1.469).There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rate of SLN between the two groups(P>0.05).The average detection number in combination method group was more than that in dye method group(P<0.05).However,there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of SLN detection number between the two groups(P>0.05).The duration of SLNB surgery in the combination method group was significantly shorter than that in the dye method group[(13.83±4.58)minutes vs(19.85±3.20)minutes),P<0.05].Conclusion  Combined method for SLNB can reduce surgical time and increase the detection rate and number of SLN.

Key words: invasive breast cancer, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, sentinel lymph node biopsy, nano carbon, combined method

[1] CAO Siyang, LIU Xia, ZHONG Jieyu, LIU Xiaoling, SUN Desheng, WEI Wei. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with novel crochet for refined sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(8): 724-728.
[2] SHI Xueliang, HUANG Qinjie, CHEN Weici, et al. Short and long term efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy combined with breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ breast cancer and its impact on post-traumatic stress disorder [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(5): 432-435.
[3] JIN Chenglong, ZHANG Jianguo. Research progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 386-389.
[4] CAO Siyang, LIU Xia, ZHU Lizhang, et al. Application of the combination of indocyanine green and methylene blue in sentinel lymph node biopsy of early-stage breast carcinoma:A Meta-analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 239-243.
[5] TA NA, WANG Xia, LI Wenjuan, et al.. Relationship between contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and GOLPH3 protein expression in breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(9): 838-841.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 848 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 856 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 862 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 865 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 882 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 847 .