JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 1152-1155.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20231417

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging combined with serum carbohydrate antigen 125 and angiopoietin like protein 2 in breast cancer

  

  1. Department of Medical Imaging,Huanggang Central Hospital of Yangtze University,Huanggang 438000,China
  • Received:2023-10-26 Accepted:2023-10-26 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-20

Abstract: Objective  To explore the diagnostic efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) combined with serum carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125) and angiopoietin like protein 2(ANGPTL2) in breast cancer.Methods  From February 2020 to June 2022,152 patients with breast diseases diagnosed initially in our hospital were collected as the subjects of this study.According to the results of pathological tissue examination(breast cancer modified radical mastectomy operation or needle biopsy),they were grouped into breast cancer group(90 cases) and benign group(62 cases).All patients underwent MRI examination.Measurement of serum CA125 and ANGPTL2 levels;receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) were analysed for the critical diagnostic points of breast cancer by MRI combined with serum CA125 and ANGPTL2;and four grid table was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of MRI combined with serum CA125 and ANGPTL2 in breast cancer.Results  The ring enhancement in breast cancer group was obviously higher than that in benign group(P<0.05),and the uniform enhancement in benign group was obviously higher than that in breast cancer group(P<0.05).The levels of serum CA125 and ANGPTL2 in breast cancer group were obviously higher than those in benign group(P<0.05).According to the ROC,the AUC of serum CA125 in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.870(95%CI:0.815~0.924) and the cut-off value was 29.574 U/ml,the AUC of serum ANGPTL2 CA125 in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.893(95%CI:0.843~0.942),the cut-off value was 6.085 ng/ml,and the AUC of MRI diagnosis of breast cancer was 0.891(95%CI:0.832~0.950).The accuracy of MRI,CA125,ANGPTL2 and combination of three indexes in the diagnosis of breast cancer were 89.47%,84.87%,82.89%,93.42% respectively.Conclusion  MRI combined with serum CA125 and ANGPTL2 can improve the diagnostic efficacy of breast cancer.

Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, carbohydrate antigen 125, angiopoietin like protein 2, breast cancer, diagnosis

[1] LI Aihua, LIU Lang, ZHANG Lingli, DUAN Di, WANG Dengchao. Expression of long non-coding RNA brain-derived neurotrophic factor-antisense and semaphorin 3B-antisense 1 in gastric cancer patients and the application of them combined ultrasound in the diagnosis of gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 721-724.
[2] WANG Yu, SHAO Bin, LIU Yang, WANG Song, ZHANG Jianguo. Current treatment status of HR + / HER 2-advanced breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(7): 780-782.
[3] GAO Chao,DAI Xiyong,JIANG Yuhui,LIU Xiaoyu,LI Jing,XIONG Hao. Analysis of the expression levels and clinical diagnostic value of miR-455 and miR-383 in serum of non-small cell lung cancer patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 607-610.
[4] YANG Li, MA Qiang, ZHANG Chunxia, ZHENG Yongcai, ZHANG Hui. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound body surface localization combined with nano carbon tracking for sentinel lymph node biopsy in cN0 invasive breast cancer patients [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(5): 476-479.
[5] SHEN Yongqiang, WANG Hui, PAN Chi. Effect of serum tumor necrosis factor receptor P55 and metallothionein 1E on clinical outcome of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(5): 490-493.
[6] WANG Huijun,QIAO Lina,JIN Xianzhen. Clinical value of serum exosome hsa_circ_0008035 in premalignant gastric lesions and early gastric cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(4): 411-416.
[7] JIANG Bingjian. Analysis of the effect and recurrence rate of breast-conserving plastic surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(3): 240-243.
[8] ZHOU Yan, DOU Fafu, ZHOU Yadong, SHEN Zhen. Diagnostic value of serum miR-141 in colorectal cancer and changes of serum miR-141 level after radical resection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(2): 199-202.
[9] . Correlation between the expression of hsa_circ_0001785 in triple negative breast cancer and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(11): 1157-1160.
[10] QIAN Fang*,SHEN Haoyuan,DENG Chunyan,SU Tingting,HU Chaohua,LIU Chenghao,XU Yuanbing,YANG Qingqing. Effects of clinical treatment decisions on long-term survival outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer with different molecular subtypes based on the SEER database [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(10): 1044-1049.
[11] CHENG Yuanyuan*,HUANG Xiaoling. Correlation between LncRNA NRON and lncRNA snaR and prognosis of triple negative breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(10): 1050-1054.
[12] JIANG Chunfeng, ZHANG Na, XING Xin, ZHANG Yuping, SONG Lei. Long noncoding RNA SLC26A4-AS1 inhibits proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells via Notch signaling pathway [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(9): 834-837.
[13] WANG Ziyi, ZUO Lindan, LIAO Zhimin, ZHENG Wei, HUANG Weijiang. Invasiveness prediction of pure ground-glass nodules (≤3cm) [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(9): 844-847.
[14] LUO Xinghong, YANG Liu, DONG Qi, TIAN Aixia, LONG Dan. Expression levels and clinical diagnostic value of lncRNA BSN-AS2 and hsa-miR-4782-3p in serum of patients with liver cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(9): 852-855.
[15] ZHOU Jiahua, ZHENG Tao, FENG Dayun, QIN Huaizhou, YANG Di. Clinical outcome of “butterfly” corpus callosum glioblastoma treated by multimodal techniques assisted microsurgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2023, 31(8): 718-722.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 777 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 807 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 808 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(11): 813 .