JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 634-638.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.07.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Establishment and validation of early enteral nutrition aspiration risk prediction model for patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on machine learning algorithm

  

  1. Hepatic Surgery Center,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2021-09-14 Accepted:2021-09-14 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-12

Abstract: Objective To explore the independent risk factors of early enteral nutrition aspiration in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) based on deep learning,and to establish a prediction model to predict the risk of early enteral nutrition aspiration. Methods The clinical data of 296 patients with severe acute pancreatitis in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of science and technology from January 2012 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed,including 268 patients without aspiration and 28 patients with aspiration.The clinical data of gender,age,body mass index,APACHE II score,consciousness,nutritional risk,nasogastric tube length,neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were compared between the two groups Support vector machine (SVM) and generalized linear regression (GLR) algorithm were used to establish five prediction models to obtain the importance of prediction variables.At the same time,the subject work curve and decision curve were drawn to test the predictive value of the model. Results APACHE-II score,consciousness,nutritional risk,length of nasogastric feeding tube and PLR were the related variables to predict early enteral nutrition aspiration.The areas under the curve of random forest,neural network,decision tree,support vector machine and generalized linear regression algorithm were 0.976,0.973, 0.961 ,0.932 and 0.921,respectively.Through comparison,the performance of random forest algorithm was the best. Conclusion The prediction model based on machine learning algorithm can accurately predict the possibility of early enteral nutrition aspiration in patients with severe acute pancreatitis,which is conducive to postoperative evaluation and clinical nursing decision-making.

Key words: severe acute pancreatitis, enteral nutrition, risk of aspiration, machine learning, risk factors

[1] ZHANG Chuanzhuo , REN Ming, MENG Dali, et al. Risk factors analysis of lateral cervical lymph node metastasis in medullary thyroid carcinoma [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 230-233.
[2] XIANG Xuan , Wufuer·Yimaer, WANG Huguo. Risk factors associated with parathyroid injury after thyroidectomy:A Metaanalysis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 234-238.
[3] LI Xinqian, CHEN Chuang, SUN Shengrong. The effect of surgical and non-surgical treatment on granulomatous lobular mastitis and the risk factors for recurrence [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 145-148.
[4] ZHAO Shuo, DANG Chengxue, LI Wenxing, et al. Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic Leakage of esophageal cancer patients after radical esophagectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 161-164.
[5] GUAN Yan, HE Linyu, LUO Yin. Construction and validation of risk prediction model for infectious complications after hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 182-185.
[6] HE Ling, Xu Kun, Ren Ming, et al.. Clinicopathological features and surgical strategy of papillary thyroid carcinoma with coexistent Hashimoto’s thyroiditis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(1): 40-43.
[7] ZHOU Lei, DING Shengyi, WANG Zhao, et al.. Analysis of deep lymph node metastasis of right recurrent laryngeal nerve in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma undergoing total thyroidectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(7): 652-655.
[8] . Logistic regression analysis of shortterm and midterm outcomes and risk factors of complications between hybrid operation and Bracket Elephant trunk technique for complex type B aortic dissection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(6): 526-529.
[9] PENG Qiwang, DENG Hao.. The effect of enteral nutrition support on gastrointestinal function,nutritional status and stress inflammatory response after radical gastric cancer surgery [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(5): 445-448.
[10] ZHENG Yanhong, LIANG Zhu, MA Bingtai, et al.. Relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinical pathology in patients with left lung cancer resection combined with regional lymph node dissection [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(5): 463-465.
[11] ZHANG Zhenwei, SUN Jiahe, ZHANG Ligong, et al.. Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(3): 243-247.
[12] . Retroperitoneal laparoscopic debridement therapy for infected pancreatic necrosis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(2): 184-186.
[13] YANG Fugang, HU Shuang, MA Chao, et al.. Mortality and related risk factors of patients for non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in hospital [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(9): 832-836.
[14] GAO Yunfei, ZHAN Yiyi, HE Dan, et al.. Analysis of the influencing factors of anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer eradication [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(9): 864-866.
[15] XU Ran, YANG Nianzhao, ZHAO Haiyuan, et al.. Clinical analysis of risk factors and prognosis of patients with multifocalgastric cancer and lymph nodemetastasis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(8): 774-777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[3] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2016, 24(10): 792 .