JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 383-385.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.04.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion

  

  1. Department of Orthopaedics,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2021-03-20 Accepted:2021-03-20 Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-20

Abstract: In recent years,with development of the theory of biportal endoscopy and the continuous updating and optimization of relevant surgical instruments and techniques,biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (BELIF) has become a new choice of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery.BELIF not only has the advantages of traditional spinal endoscopy,such as less trauma,magnifying the surgical field and avoiding the operator’s bow for a long time,but also could use traditional open surgical instruments,which is more efficient and flexible and widely decompressed.However,it also has some disadvantages,such as longer operation time and steep learning curve compared with traditional open surgery.Moreover,at present,BELIF has a short development history,the followup time of most relevant studies is short,and its safety and efficacy are still lack of highlevel evidence support.It is necessary to further evaluate and verify the medium and longterm efficacy of this technology.This paper reviews the development history,technical points,indications,contraindications,advantages and disadvantages and complications of BELIF.

Key words: biportal endoscopy, lumbar interbody fusion, spine

[1] WANG Huan, WANG Zhenyu, HOU Haitao, et al. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopy and oblique lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of traumatic Ⅰ and Ⅱ grade spondylolisthesis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 323-327.
[2] WANG Zhiwei, FENG Jing, LIU Wei, et al. A case report and literature review of a rare complication of percutaneous intervertebral endoscopic spinal cord hypertension syndrome [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(1): 50-52.
[3] ZHAO Yonghui, LIANG Jinlong, LUO Haotian, et al.. Comparison of free-hand technique and guide plate-assisted placement of lumbar cortical bone channel screws [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(1): 54-57.
[4] WANG Zhiwei, HAN Sendong. Correlation analysis of Roussouly classification and spine-pelvic sagittal balance parameters with prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(1): 58-60.
[5] . Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous curved vertebroplasty in the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(11): 1059-1062.
[6] LIU Rong, LIU Bin, GAO Di, et al.. Clinical application of mixed reality technology in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures in the elderly [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(10): 966-969.
[7] ZHU Ling, XIE Wei, DENG Chang, et al.. Experience in the treatment of 18 cases of lumbar degenerative diseases withextraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(10): 970-973.
[8] LI Zhi, WU Haihui, Wang Deguo.. Comparative study of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(1): 73-77.
[9] ZHOU Ziyu, HOU Caiyun, SI Jianwei.. Prediction of risk factors of occurrence and development of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(4): 324-327.
[10] QIAO Lin, ZHOU Yuping, XU Junpeng, et al. Clinical effect of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in the treatment of single level degenerative lumbar disease [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(9): 702-704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . Modification of immunosuppressive regimens for coronavirus disease 2019 infection secondary to renal transplantation recipients[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(4): 385 -387 .
[2] . Clinical application of autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes combined with antiPD1 antibody in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2021, 29(8): 743 -747 .
[3] simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantaction, bladder drainage, pancreatic leak. Management of pancreatic leak in bladder-drained simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation recipients[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 266 -268 .
[4] LI Qiuli, TIAN Jiahe, GUO Zhuming. Targeted therapy for recurrent or advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(3): 287 -289 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 301 -302 .
[6] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 303 -305 .
[7] JIN Chenglong, ZHANG Jianguo. Research progress of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 386 -389 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(4): 391 -392 .