JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 522-526.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.06.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Stanford type B aortic dissection with Hybrid and fenestration TEVAR reconstruction of the left subclavian artery

  

  • Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-06-20

Abstract: Objective:Observe the clinical efficacy and safety of TEVAR combined with fenestration in the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection.Methods:The clinical data of 81 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection were analyzed in a prospective cohort study in our hospital from April 2012 to January 2017.According to different methods of reconstruction of the left subclavian artery,the patients were divided into the fenestration TEVAR group(n=47)and the hybrid TEVAR group(subclavian artery bypass grafting)(n=34).The clinical characteristics,surgical conditions,complications and survival outcomes of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no death or paraplegia in either group.The mean operative time of the fenestration TEVAR group was(128±27)min,the mean length of hospital stay was(7.5±2.1)d,the incidence of postoperative pain was 17%.While data of the hybrid TEVAR group were (237±47)min,(13.3±3.6)d and 41.2%,respectively.In the fenestration TEVAR group,the incidence of proximal reverse dissection was 4.3%,the incidence of type Ia leakage was 6.4%,prospective incidence was 10.6%,incidence of renal insufficiency was 14.9%.While in the hybrid TEVAR group was 8.8%、11.8%、23.5%、20.6%,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with the hybrid TEVAR group,the number,length and proximal and distal diameters of the scaffolds implanted in the windowed TEVAR group were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The followup time was 36 months,and the followup rate was 90.1%.During the followup period,in the fenestration TEVAR group,the allcause mortality rate was 8.5%,the incidence of proximal reverse dissection was 4.3%the distal thoracic aorta distended was 14.9%,the incidence of intraoperative repair was 4.3%,and the incidence of aortic remodeling was 74.5%.In the hybrid TEVAR group,the data were 8.8%,5.9%,17.6%,2.9%,82.4%,respectively.Conclusion:Compared with the hybrid TEVAR group,the fenestration TEVAR group improved the longterm prognosis,did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications,shortened the operation time,hospital stay and reduced postoperative pain.Stanford type B aortic dissection may give preference to the fenestration TEVAR for preservation of LSA.

Key words: aortic dissection, left subclavian artery, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, fenestration

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WU Yongfeng, LIU Xingzhou, LIU Dong, et al. The effect of regulative dualchannel digestive tract reconstruction on the gallbladder systolic function and nutritional status in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2018, 26(10): 767 -770 .
[2] SONG Dianbin, ZHANG Jingjing, MA Guang, et al.. Effect of preoperative MSCTA and intraoperative ultrasound on postoperative laparoscopic occlusion of renal segmental arterial partial nephrectomy [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(1): 82 -84 .
[3] LIU Yi, QI Wei, LIU Baohua.. Protective ileostomy in low rectal cancer anus preservation surgery should pay attention to the problem[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(2): 186 -189 .
[4] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(3): 288 -289 .
[5] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(4): 397 .
[6] . Robotic rectal cancer surgery[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(5): 489 -492 .
[7] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 500 .
[8] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 501 -503 .
[9] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 504 -508 .
[10] . [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2020, 28(6): 508 -510 .