临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1315-1318.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20240198

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经皮内镜下腰椎后路融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效分析

张鹏伟 武栋泽 李旭 秦入结   

  1. 222000 江苏省徐州医科大学附属连云港医院脊柱外科(张鹏伟、李旭、秦入结), 运动医学科(武栋泽)
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-06 出版日期:2025-01-14 发布日期:2025-01-14
  • 通讯作者: 秦入结,Email:lygqinrj@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省连云港市第六期“521工程”科研项目资助计划(LYG06521202215)

Effect of Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion in the Treatment of Mild Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

ZHANG Pengwei,WU Dongze,LI Xu,QIN Rujie   

  1. Department of Spinal Surgery,Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 222000,China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-14

摘要: 目的 分析经皮内镜下腰椎后路融合手术(PE-PLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效,对其安全性和有效性进行评估。方法 2018年1月~2021年12月行PE-PLIF手术治疗Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱病人46例,收集病人年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)等一般资料,手术时间、出血量、透视次数等术中资料,比较术前、术后3天及术后12个月的腰腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分,采用Macnab标准评价病人满意度,采用Lenke分型标准评价融合情况。随访1.2~3.3年。结果 平均手术时间为(143.76±34.39)分钟,术中平均透视(6.98±0.75)次,平均住院时间(9.13±3.68)天。腰痛术前VAS评分2~9分,平均(6.14±2.79)分;术后3天VAS 评分0~5分,平均(2.02±1.52)分,与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后12个月随访VAS 评分0~3分,平均(1.09±0.92)分,与术后3天比较明显好转,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。病人下肢痛术前VAS评分 4~9分,平均(6.58±2.20)分;术后3天VAS 评分0~5分,平均(1.72±1.45)分,与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后12个月随访VAS 评分0~3分,平均(1.13±0.95)分,与术后3天比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。病人ODI评分由术前(77.25±9.82)%降至术后12个月随访的(15.73±9.86)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后并发症共包含脑脊液漏3例、神经根性症状2例、滑脱不完全复位1例、内固定断裂开放手术翻修1例。按照Macnab标准评定病人满意度,优27例(58.7%)、良15例(32.6%)、一般4例(8.7%),无不良评价。结论 PE-PLIF是一种安全有效的治疗轻度腰椎滑脱症的方法。

关键词: 腰椎滑脱; 微创手术; 后入路; 腰椎融合

Abstract: Objective analyze the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar posterior fusion(PE-PLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis and evaluate its safety and effectiveness.Methods From January 2018 to December 2021,46 patients with grade Ⅰ degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent PE-PLIF surgery in the Department of Orthopedics of our hospital.General data such as age,gender,body mass index(BMI),operative time,blood loss and fluoroscopy were collected.Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scores were compared before surgery,3 days and 12 months after surgery to analyze the efficacy.Macnab was used to evaluate patient satisfaction,and Lenke was used to evaluate fusion.Follow-up was 1.2 to 3.3 years.Results The average operative time of the patients was (143.76±34.39)min,the average intraoperative fluoroscopy was (6.98±0.75)times,and the average hospitalization was (9.13±3.68)days.The VAS scores before low back pain ranged from 2 to 9, with an average of (6.14±2.79). The VAS score at 3 days after operation was 0-5, with an average of (2.02±1.52) points, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that before operation (P <0.05).The VAS score at 12 months after surgery was 0 to 3, with an average of (1.09±0.92) points, which was significantly improved compared with 3 days after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). VAS scores of patients before lower extremity pain ranged from 4 to 9 points, with an average of (6.58±2.20) points. The VAS score at 3 days after surgery was 0-5, with an average of (1.72±1.45) points, and the difference was statistically significant compared with that before surgery (P<0.05). The VAS score at 12 months after surgery was 0~3, with an average of (1.13±0.95), and the difference was statistically significant compared with 3 days after surgery (P<0.05).ODI score of patients decreased from (77.25±9.82)% before surgery to (15.73±9.86)% after 12 months of follow-up, with statistical significance (P<0.05).Postoperative complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 3 cases, radiculopathy in 2 cases, incomplete reduction in 1 case, and open surgical revision of internal fixation rupture in 1 case. According to Macnab criteria, 27 patients were excellent (58.7%), 15 were good (32.6%), and 4 were average (8.7%), with no adverse evaluation.Conclusion The results of this study indicate that PE-PLIF is a safe and effective treatment for mild lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Key words: lumbar degeneration; minimally invasive surgery; posterior approach; lumbar fusion

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[2] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[3] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[4] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[5] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[6] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[7] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[8] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[9] 胡小平;王志维;邓宏平;等. 改良全主动脉弓置换治疗老年Stanford A型主动脉夹层[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 777 .
[10] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .