临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 1299-1303.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.20231610

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

多炎性因子动态分析对腹部外伤病人脓毒症风险的预测价值

葛新义 裴守科 聂玉松 汪超   

  1. 225000 江苏省扬州市广陵区妇幼保健院普外科(葛新义);武警江苏总队医院普外科(裴守科、聂玉松、汪超)
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2025-01-14 发布日期:2025-01-14
  • 通讯作者: 汪超,Email:c19lucky@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省医学重点人才计划项目(201704221329);江苏省医院协会创新研究课题项目(JSYGY-3-2018-74)

Predictive value of dynamic analysis of multiple inflammatory factors for the risk of sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma

GE Xinyi,PEI Shouke,NIE Yusong,WANG Chao   

  1. Department of General surgery,Guangling District Maternal and Child Health hospital,Yangzhou City,Jiangsu Province,Yangzhou 225000,China
  • Received:2023-11-30 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-14

摘要: 目的 分析多炎性因子动态变化对早期筛查腹部外伤病人脓毒症风险的预测价值。方法 2018年1月~2022年1月武警江苏省总队医院普外科收治的腹部外伤病人360例。根据病人是否发生脓毒症分为脓毒症组和对照组。比较两组的一般资料和炎症指标动态变化。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响腹部外伤病人发生脓毒症的相关因素,应用ROC曲线分析多炎症因子动态变化等因素筛查腹部外伤病人发生脓毒症的价值。结果 纳入研究的病人中有13例病例脱落,剩余347例,其中51例发生脓毒症为脓毒症组,296例未发生脓毒症为对照组。脓毒症的发生率为14.70%。两组病人年龄、血糖、入院时白细胞等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但脓毒症组SOFA评分为(1.86±0.45)分,大于对照组的(1.54±0.36)分,脓毒症组C反应蛋白(CRP)变化差值为(5.67±1.17)mg/L、72小时后降钙素原(PCT)为(0.12±0.05)ng/ml、PCT变异率为(36.43±8.02)%、血清淀粉酶A蛋白(SAA)变化差值为(8.62±1.05)mg/L、中性粒细胞百分比变化差值为(9.31±1.09)%,均高于对照组的(4.79±0.63)mg/L、(0.10±0.04)ng/ml、(28.04±6.21)%、(7.11±0.84)mg/L、(8.41±0.92)%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,SOFA评分(OR=1.648)、CRP变化差值(OR=2.338)、PCT变异率(OR=1.096)、SAA变化差值(OR=6.043)、中性粒细胞百分比变化差值(OR=3.355)是腹部外伤病人发生脓毒症风险的独立危险因素。ROC曲线显示,SAA变化差值预测腹部外伤病人发生脓毒症风险的诊断效能高于CRP变化差值、PCT变异率、中性粒细胞百分比变化差值和SOFA评分。结论 多种炎症因子的动态分析对早期筛查腹部外伤病人发生脓毒症风险有较高价值,监测炎症因子的变化有助于早期调整治疗方案。

关键词: 炎症因子; 动态变化; 腹部外伤; 脓毒症

Abstract: Objective To analyze the predictive value of dynamic changes of multiple inflammatory factors in early screening of sepsis risk in patients with abdominal trauma.Methods A total of 360 patients with abdominal trauma admitted to the Department of Surgery of Jiangsu Provincial Corps Hospital of the Chinese People’s Armed Police Force from January 2018 to January 2022 were studied.Patients were divided into sepsis group and control group according to whether sepsis occurred.The general data and dynamic changes of inflammatory indicators were compared between the two groups.Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the related factors of sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma,and ROC curve was used to analyze the value of dynamic changes of multiple inflammatory factors in predicting sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma.Results Among the patients included in the study,13 cases fell out,leaving 347 cases,of which 51 patients with sepsis were classified as sepsis group,and the remaining 296 cases were classified as control group.The incidence of sepsis was 14.70%.There was no significant difference in age,blood glucose and white blood cell at admission between the two groups(P>0.05).But the SOFA score in sepsis group(1.86±0.45) was higher than that in control group(1.54±0.36).In sepsis group, the difference of C-reactive protein (CRP) was (5.67±1.17)mg/L, the PCT was (0.12±0.05)ng/ml, the PCT variation rate was (36.43±8.02)%, and the difference of serum amylase A protein (SAA) was (8.62±1.05)m g/L,the difference of neutrophil percentage was (9.31±1.09)%, which was higher than that of control group[(4.79±0.63) mg/L,(0.10±0.04) ng/ml,(28.04±6.21)%,(7.11±0.84) mg/L,(8.41±0.92)%],the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that:SOFA score(OR=1.648),CRP change difference(OR=2.338),PCT variation rate(OR=1.096),SAA change difference(OR=6.043),neutrophil percentage change difference(OR=3.355) were independent risk factors for sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma.ROC curve showed that SAA difference was more effective in predicting the risk of sepsis in patients with abdominal trauma than CRP difference,PCT variation rate,neutrophil percentage change difference and SOFA score.Conclusion Dynamic analysis of multiple inflammatory factors is valuable for early screening of sepsis risk in patients with abdominal trauma,and monitoring the changes of inflammatory factors is helpful for early adjustment of treatment.

Key words: inflammatory cytokines; dynamic change; abdominal trauma; sepsis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[3] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[4] 江帆;孙权;吴国俊;等. 不同引流方式对恶性梗阻性黄疸患者细胞免疫的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 760 .
[5] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[6] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[7] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[8] 胡小平;王志维;邓宏平;等. 改良全主动脉弓置换治疗老年Stanford A型主动脉夹层[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 777 .
[9] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[10] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .