临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 882-886.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.08.027

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种不同自控镇痛方案对胸腔镜下肺癌手术治疗病人镇静镇痛的影响

  

  1. 232007  安徽省淮南市,安徽理工大学第一附属医院麻醉科 
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-06 修回日期:2023-07-06 接受日期:2023-07-06 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 尹玉良,Email:402556548@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2022年度淮南市市级科技计划项目(2022170)

Effects of three different patient-controlled analgesia protocols on sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,the First Hospital of Anhui University of Science & Technology,Huainan,Anhui 232007,Anhui,China
  • Received:2023-07-06 Revised:2023-07-06 Accepted:2023-07-06 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-20

摘要: 目的  探讨三种不同自控镇痛方案对肺癌手术病人镇静镇痛的影响。方法  2022年11月~2023年4月行胸腔镜下肺癌手术治疗病人93例。根据术后镇痛方式不同分为静脉自控镇痛组(P组,30例)、静脉自控镇痛联合椎旁神经阻滞组(T组,31例)和静脉自控镇痛联合前锯肌平面阻滞组(S组,32例)。比较三组术后视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、Ramsay评分、镇痛泵按压次数、镇静药物使用情况、不良反应,比较T组和S组麻醉平面、阻滞操作时间、阻滞起效时间、阻滞持续时间。结果  静息状态下P组术后2小时、24小时、48小时VAS评分分别为(3.09±0.69)分、(2.83±0.59)分和(2.07±0.51)分,高于T组的(1.22±0.33)分、(2.51±0.54)分、(1.57±0.45)分和S组的(1.01±0.30)分、(2.23±0.51)分、(1.22±0.25)分,T组高于S组;咳嗽状态下P组术后2小时、24小时、48小时 VAS评分分别为(3.63±0.55)分、(3.24±0.67)分和(2.61±0.51)分,高于T组的(1.45±0.29)分、(2.71±0.56)分、(2.33±0.53)分和S组的(1.14±0.28)分、(2.40±0.57)分和(2.03±0.52)分,T组高于S组;三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。P组术后2小时、24小时、48小时Ramsay评分分别为(2.21±0.51)分、(2.34±0.56)分和(2.31±0.55)分,T组分别为(2.23±0.53)分和、(2.35±0.55)分和(2.33±0.54)分,S组分别为(2.22±0.52)分、(2.36±0.57)分和(2.32±0.55)分,三组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。P组术后24小时、48小时镇痛泵按压次数分别为(10.18±2.42)次、(14.51±3.20)次,高于T组的(3.32±0.79)次、(6.84±1.62)次和S组的(1.17±0.28)次、(2.63±0.62)次,T组高于S组,三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。P组术后舒芬太尼追加剂量为(8.05±1.99)μg,舒芬太尼使用总量为(71.53±6.91)μg,多于T组的(3.77±0.93)μg、(65.82±5.77)μg和S组的(2.23±0.55)μg、(47.54±4.56)μg,T组多于S组,三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S组阻滞操作时间为(5.32±1.77)分钟,短于T组的(12.41±3.42)分钟,阻滞持续时间为(12.51±2.14)小时,长于T组的(10.31±2.01)小时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。S组不良反应发生率为6.25%,低于P组的30.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但三组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论  三种不同自控镇痛方案镇静效果相当,但静脉自控镇痛联合前锯肌平面阻滞更能提供较好的术后镇痛,镇痛泵按压次数及术后镇痛药物使用更少,不良反应更少。

关键词: 静脉自控镇痛, 椎旁神经阻滞, 前锯肌平面阻滞, 肺癌, 胸腔镜, 镇痛, 镇静

Abstract: Objective  To explore the effects of three different patient-controlled analgesia protocols on sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.Methods  Ninety-three patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer in our hospital from November 2022 to April 2023 were selected,and randomly assigned into three groups according to different postoperative analgesic protocols.Group P (n=30) was given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia,group T (n=31) received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia combined with thoracic paravertebral block,while group S (n=32) received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia combined with serratus intercostal plane block.Then the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score,Ramsay sedation scores,the press times of analgesic pump,the use of sedative drugs and adverse effects were compared among all three groups,and the sensory block plane,performance time,onset time and duration of the block were compared between group T and S.Results  VAS scores in the resting state at postoperative 2h,24h and 48h were (3.09±0.69),(2.83±0.59) and (2.07±0.51) in group P,which were higher than group T[(1.22±0.33),(2.51±0.54) and (1.57±0.45)] and group S[(1.01±0.30),(2.23±0.51) and (1.22±0.25)],group T was higher than group S.VAS scores in the coughing state at postoperative 2h,24h and 48h were (3.63±0.55),(3.24±0.67) and (2.61±0.51) in group P,which were higher than the group T[(1.45±0.29),(2.71±0.56) and (2.33±0.53)] and group S[(1.14±0.28),(2.40±0.57) and (2.03±0.52)],group T was higher than group S.VAS scores in the resting and coughing states at postoperative 2h,24h and 48h yielded statistical difference among three groups (all P<0.05).Ramsay sedation scores at postoperative 2h,24h and 48h were (2.21±0.51),(2.34±0.56) and (2.31±0.55) in group P,(2.23±0.53),(2.35±0.55) and (2.33±0.54) in group T and (2.22±0.52),(2.36±0.57) and (2.32±0.55) in group S,with no statistical difference (all P>0.05).The press times of analgesic pump at postoperative 24h and 48h were (10.18±2.42) and (14.51±3.20) in group P,which were higher than the group T[(3.32±0.79) and (6.84±1.62)] and group S[(1.17±0.28) and (2.63±0.62)],group T was higher than group S,with statistical difference (all P<0.05).The additional dose of sufentanil and the total amount of sufentanil used in postoperative period were (8.05±1.99)μg and (71.53±6.91)μg in group P,which were more than the group T[(3.77±0.93)μg and (65.82±5.77)μg] and the group S[(2.23±0.55)μg and (47.54±4.56)μg],group T was higher than group S,with statistical difference (all P<0.05).Group S had shorter performance time[(5.32±1.77)min] and longer block duration time[(12.51±2.14)h] than those of group T[(12.41±3.42)min and (10.31±2.01)h],with statistical difference(all P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 6.25% in group S,which was lower than the group P (30.00%,P<0.05),and no statistical difference was reported among three groups in the occurrence rate of comparisons (all P>0.05).Conclusion  The sedation effects of the three different patient-controlled analgesia protocols are comparable,but patient-controlled intravenous analgesia combined with serratus intercostal plane block provides better postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer,which has less analgesic pump presses and lower dose of postoperative analgesic drugs used,and fewer adverse effects.

Key words: patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, thoracic paravertebral block, serratus intercostal plane block, lung cancer, thoracoscopy, analgesia, sedation

[1] 黄如敬 鲁洪岭 吴超 杨洪娟 尹晓明 赵阳 康华薇 田菲 孙云川. 非小细胞肺癌病人血清miR-326和miR-623表达与临床病理特征及预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 706-710.
[2] 刘玉婷 文进秋 侯彦深 郭明珊 艾孜买提·艾尼瓦尔 热孜亚·艾尔肯 张冰. 右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼病人自控静脉镇痛对胸腔镜下肺癌根治术病人术后免疫功能及呼吸功能恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 767-771.
[3] 伊思敏 陈佳睿 杨静. 老年病人区域麻醉镇静对围术期神经认知功能障碍的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 565-568.
[4] 于姗姗 邓经飞 韩小莉 赵晶. 周围神经阻滞会影响急性骨筋膜室综合症的诊断吗?[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 569-571.
[5] 汤峰 徐紫清 王彩红 陈亚花 刘荣鑫 薛建军. 超声引导下胸横肌平面阻滞的临床应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 572-574.
[6] 白冰 唐帅 张越伦 申乐. 术中肋间神经阻滞与术前超声引导下椎旁阻滞对胸腔镜肺部手术病人术后并发症的影响分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 581-585.
[7] 高超 戴希勇 蒋钰辉 刘小玉 李晶 熊浩. 非小细胞肺癌病人血清中miR-455、miR-383表达水平及其临床诊断价值分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 607-610.
[8] 林道艺 叶鹏 龚灿生 王丹凤 郑艇 郑晓春. 竖脊肌平面阻滞的围术期应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 657-660.
[9] 丁维思 安海燕. 髋关节囊周阻滞在髋关节手术术后镇痛中应用的有效性与安全性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 664-666.
[10] 程智怡 王爱忠. 差异性神经阻滞在术后镇痛中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 667-670.
[11] 杨子恒 李樊 赵波. 改良模块化剑突下胸腔镜胸腺肿瘤切除术临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 262-265.
[12] 万伟 张彬 刘勇志 井淼 王晓栋. 胸腔镜下肺叶切除、解剖性肺段切除、肺楔形切除治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 266-270.
[13] 黄晓媚 郭明 骆俊龙 包传恩 胡蒙. 血清血管内皮生长因子、胰岛素样生长因子-1水平与胸腔镜食管癌根治术后食管胃吻合口漏的相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 276-280.
[14] 苏政军 黄珊珊 陈万进. 血清纤维胶凝蛋白3、胶原三股螺旋重复蛋白1对非小细胞肺癌的诊断价值及与临床病理特征的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 164-167.
[15] 刘峻峰 金方童 刘晓平. 同时性早期胃癌合并肺癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 111-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[2] 李晓辉;金太欣;邵永胜 . 升结肠回盲部肿瘤侵犯乙状结肠22例治疗体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 841 .
[3] 戴玮;邱建平;高泉根;等. 腹膜前间隙修补术在股疝治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 826 .
[4] 谭海洋;罗良弢;严想元. 肠内营养与肠外营养在腹腔镜胃肠道肿瘤患者术后早期应用的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 910 .
[5] 徐媛;宋亚锋;许涛. 谷氨酰胺并肠外营养支持在外科术后危重患者中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 914 .
[6] 张华园;高峰;董军等. 颅内多发脑膜瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 319 .
[7] 冯勋强. 改良Devine治疗小儿隐匿性阴茎158例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 379 -0 .
[8] 王婵;董传江;张路生等. 假瘤性腺性囊性膀胱炎的临床诊断与治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 335 -0 .
[9] 金祺;阮文枫;赵欣宇等. Buck技术结合钉棒系统治疗青少年峡部裂性腰椎滑脱一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 347 -0 .
[10] 姜军 . 加速康复外科理念在金陵术围手术期的应用——肠道预康复治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 422 .