临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 854-857.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.08.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

负压封闭引流联合活性因子敷料及皮瓣转移术治疗Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折的效果

  

  1. 215611  江苏省张家港市第三人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 修回日期:2023-08-02 接受日期:2023-08-02 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 肖锦春,Email:xiaojinchun75@sina.com

Effect of negative pressure closed drainage combined with active factor dressing and flap transfer in the treatment of Gustilo type Ⅲ tibiofibula fracture

  1. Department of Orthopedics,The Third People’s Hospital of Zhangjiagang City,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215611,China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Revised:2023-08-02 Accepted:2023-08-02 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-20

摘要: 目的  探讨负压封闭引流联合活性因子敷料、皮瓣转移术治疗Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折的效果。方法 2019年3月~2022年3月我院骨科收治的Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折病人92例,采用随机数字表法分为两组,实验组46例,采用内外固定+皮瓣转移术+负压封闭引流+活性因子敷料治疗;对照组46例,采用内外固定+皮瓣转移术+常规换药+活性因子敷料治疗,比较两组的临床指标、临床疗效、踝关节功能、下肢功能及并发症。结果 实验组住院时间为(25.32±8.36)天、皮瓣愈合时间为(9.69±1.24)天、骨折愈合时间为(8.24±1.84)个月、创面愈合时间为(14.24±3.84)天,对照组为(43.44±11.84)天、(11.53±2.07)天、(9.12±2.50)个月、(50.11±5.12)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组总有效率(93.48%,43例/46例)高于对照组(71.74%,33例/46例)两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后踝关节疼痛评分均低于治疗前,且实验组低于对照组;两组治疗后踝关节功能评分和稳定性评分、美国足踝外科协会评分(AOFAS)评分、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS评分)均高于治疗前,且实验组高于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组并发症总发生率(4.34%,2例/46例)低于对照组(17.39%,8例/46例,P<0.05)。结论 负压封闭引流联合活性因子敷料应用在Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折术病人中效果显著,可促进术后创面恢复,改善踝关节和下肢功能,且并发症发生率低。

关键词: 负压封闭引流, 皮瓣转移术, Gustilo Ⅲ型胫腓骨骨折, 活性因子敷料, 骨折愈合

Abstract: Objective  To explore the application effect of negative pressure sealing drainage combined with active factor dressing and flap transfer in Gustilo Ⅲ type tibiofibular fractures.Methods  From March 2019 to March 2022,92 patients with Gustilo type Ⅲ tibiofibular fracture admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics of the Third People’s Hospital of Zhangjiagang City were randomly divided into the experimental group (internal and external fixation+flap transfer+negative pressure sealing drainage+active factor dressing,n=46) and the control group (internal and external fixation+flap transfer+conventional dressing change+active factor dressing,n=46),and the clinical indexes,clinical efficacy,ankle joint function,lower limb function and complications were compared.Result  The hospital stay time (25.32±8.36)d,the flap healing time (9.69±1.24)d,the fracture healing time (8.24±1.84)month and the wound healing time (14.24±3.84)d of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group (43.44±11.84)d,(11.53±2.07)d and (9.12±2 .50) month,(50.11±5.12) d (P<0.05).The total effective rate of the experimental group (93.48%,43 cases /46 cases) was higher than that of the control group (71.74%,33 cases /46 cases,P<0.05).The ankle pain scores of both groups after treatment were lower than before treatment,and the experimental group was lower than the control group,and the scores of ankle function and stability,the scores of American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) and the knee joint score of American Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) after treatment were higher in both groups than before treatment,and the experimental group was higher than the control group (P<0.05).The total complication rate of the experimental group (4.34%,2 cases /46 cases) was lower than that of the control group (17.39%,8 cases /46 cases,P<0.05).Conclusion  The application of negative pressure closed drainage combined with active factor dressing in Gustilo type Ⅲ tibia and fibula fracture is effective,can promote postoperative wound recovery,improve ankle and lower limb function,and the incidence of complications is low.

Key words: negative pressure closed drainage, flap transfer surgery, Gustilo type Ⅲ tibiofibular fracture, active factor dressing, fracture healing

[1] 郭忠梁 刘元媛 刘应平 王静 徐敏 王国昌. 胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶联合负压封闭引流的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 318-322.
[2] 沈华清 王东方 尹恩志 廖忆刘. 下肢严重开放性损伤创面修复的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 216-218.
[3] 于锦利 陈顺革. 改良封闭负压引流术治疗肛瘘伴臀大肌脓肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 591-592.
[4] 向锋 沈健 翁志勇. 负压封闭引流结合前臂皮瓣移植修复老年前臂及手部深度创面[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 783-785.
[5] 张磊 段小亮 彭海军 魏兰. 负压封闭引流在胸壁结核病灶清除术后伤口愈合不良中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 749-751.
[6] 郭科委 朱勋兵 袁伶俐 韩俊柱 张仲传 徐文弟. 负压封闭引流技术联合银离子敷料治疗骨科感染性创面的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 189-192.
[7] 邱海军, 潘力生. 负压封闭引流技术联合自体游离皮片移植对下肢静脉性溃疡病人创面愈合及生活质量评分的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 188-190.
[8] 李洋 钱松杰 普布顿珠 尼玛平措 旦增欧珠 索朗次仁 扎西平措巴桑普尺 王德国 张善兰. 海拔4000米以上高原地区应用负压封闭引流治疗开放性创伤后皮肤坏死[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1165-1166.
[9] 李潜 汪林宝 罗佩嘉 韦林 刘玉钢 任磊鹏 丁超. 负压封闭引流术联合创面冲洗在难愈性胸壁结核创面中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1141-1143.
[10] 王维新, 王丹, 卢飞等. 改良负压封闭引流在重度污染创面治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 763-764.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[2] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[3] 林海鹏;卢晓明;管日戬;等. ω-3鱼油脂肪乳对老年胃癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 907 .
[4] 叶向红;彭南海;李维勤. 早期肠内营养联合早期运动促进外科重症患者康复[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 960 .
[5] 唐健雄 . 疝和腹壁外科该怎样规范化的持续发展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 245 .
[6] 闵凯 . 疝修补材料学的新进展与疝外科手术的改进[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 257 .
[7] 苏福增 王志 张成等 . 嵌顿性腹股沟疝合并肾病综合征患者的围手术期处理 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 260 .
[8] 王光林;冯先才;何前进等 . 内镜切除治疗巨大胃间质瘤的临床效果及安全性分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 434 .
[9] 俞勇;吴世舫 . 三种术式联合治疗腰椎间盘突出症合并腰椎管狭窄的疗效分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 453 .
[10] 奚新明;万锋 . 枕部经小脑幕入路显微手术治疗松果体区肿瘤65例临床分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 472 .