临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 807-810.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.08.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良全腔镜术对伴慢性肺部疾病食管癌病人肺功能、术后进食、并发症的影响

  

  1. 053000   河北省衡水市第二人民医院心胸外科(王继超、张建华、杨锦、王林佩);河北衡水市第三人民医院肺病科(薛军英)
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-27 修回日期:2023-07-27 接受日期:2023-07-27 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-20
  • 基金资助:
    衡水市重点研发计划(2020014033Z)

The effect of improved total cavity endoscopy on lung function,postoperative feeding and complications in patients with chronic lung disease of esophageal cancer

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,The Second People’s Hospital of Hengshui,Hengshui 053000,China
  • Received:2023-07-27 Revised:2023-07-27 Accepted:2023-07-27 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-20

摘要: 目的 探讨改良全腔镜术对伴慢性肺部疾病食管癌病人肺功能、术后进食、并发症的影响。方法  2022年9月~2023年6月收治的伴慢性肺部疾病食管癌病人120例,采用随机数字表法分为两组。观察组60例,行改良全腔镜辅助食管癌切除术,对照组60例,行传统开放手术。比较两组病人围术期相关指标以及术前、术后1周、2周的肺功能指标[第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV-1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、最大通气量(MVV)]、炎症因子水平[白细胞介素(IL-6、IL-8、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α]、术后进食、并发症发生情况。结果  观察组术中出血量、手术时间、淋巴结清扫数量、引流时间分别为(329.51±78.84)ml、(175.47±10.41)分钟、(29.67±17.86)枚/例 、(3.14±0.98)天;对照组分别为(372.31±99.23)ml、(148.54±10.68)分钟、(28.36±18.15)枚 、(6.37±1.23)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后2周的FEV-1、FVC、MVV分别为(1.88±0.53)L、(2.33±0.46)L、(32.59±11.84)L;对照组分别为(1.37±0.31)L、(1.75±0.38)L、(23.68±9.41)L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后2周的炎症因子IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α分别为(2.17±1.62)ng/ml、(2.09±1.52)ng/ml、(1.32±0.57)ng/ml;对照组分别为(3.06±1.52)ng/ml、(2.75±1.29)ng/ml、(1.73±0.75)ng/ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组与对照组的术后并发症发生率分别为6.67%、20.00%,观察组病人术后进食早于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论  改良全腔镜手术相较于传统开放手术,手术创伤小、操作简便,对肺功能损伤较小,术后并发症发生率低,术后进食早。

关键词: 食管癌, 改良全腔镜术, 传统开放手术, 肺功能, 并发症

Abstract: Objective  To explore the effect of improved total cavity endoscopy on lung function,postoperative feeding and complications in patients with chronic lung disease of esophageal cancer. Methods  120 esophageal cancer patients with chronic lung disease admitted to our hospital from September 2022 to June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups.The observation group consisted of 60 patients who underwent improved total cavity endoscopy assisted esophageal cancer resection,while the control group consisted of 60 patients who underwent traditional open surgery.The perioperative related indexes,lung function indexes [forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV-1),forced vital capacity (FVC),maximum ventilation volume (MVV)],inflammatory level [interleukin-6(IL-6),interleukin-8(IL-8),tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)] were compared between the two groups.Results  The blood loss,operation time,number of lymph node dissection and drainage time in the observation group were (329.51±78.84)ml,(175.47±10.41)min,(29.67±17.86) pieces per case and (3.14±0.98) d respectively.In the control group,the intraoperative blood loss,operation time,number of lymph node dissection and drainage time were (372.31±99.23)ml,(148.54±10.68)min,(28.36±18.15) pieces and (6.37±1.23) d,respectively, there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).The FEV-1,FVC and MVV of the observation group were (1.88±0.53) L,(2.33±0.46) L and (32.59±11.84)L,respectively.Two weeks after operation,the control group was (1.37±0.31) L,(1.75±0.38) L and (23.68±9.41) L respectively, there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).The inflammatory factors IL-6,IL-8 and TNF-α in the observation group were (2.17±1.62)ng/ml,(2.09±1.52)ng/ml and (1.32±0.57) ng/ml,respectively.The control group were (3.06±1.52)ng/ml,(2.75±1.29)ng/ml and (1.73±0.75) ng/ml respectively, there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group and the control group were 6.67% and 20.00% respectively,and patients in the observation group ate earlier than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional open surgery,the improved total laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less trauma,simpler operation,less damage to lung function,significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications,and shorter postoperative eating time.

Key words: esophageal cancer, improved total cavity endoscopy, traditional open surgery, lung function, complication

[1] 孙梦飞 祁玲 李勇. 食管癌外科治疗为主的治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 785-788.
[2] 孔维博 刘轶炜 郑浩 张仁泉. 影像组学和深度学习在食管外科治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 796-799.
[3] 范青禄 聂志浩 韦树健 罗仁维 谢颂平. 食管癌切除术后消化道重建替代器官的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 800-802.
[4] 康树宏 吕峰 倪云峰 贠俊茹. 微小核糖核酸-27a、微小核糖核酸-1299预测食管癌病人术后预后的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 803-806.
[5] 陈海南 冷雪峰. 食管癌术后吻合口瘘预测因子及相关预测模型的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(8): 892-895.
[6] 徐业成 傅德良. 胰腺全切除术在胰腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 677-679.
[7] 王青 陈丽丽 刘郁鹏. 食管癌术后颈部吻合口漏列线图风险预测模型的建立和应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 716-720.
[8] 岳敏 栾阳 阮亚俊 郝晓东 彭昊. 经会阴与经直肠前列腺穿刺活检对前列腺癌的诊断效能和并发症比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(7): 753-756.
[9] 刘胜凯 崔丽娜 李俊鹏 石俊杰 范艳玲. 手术入路对食管癌根治术病人并发症及肿瘤标志物水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 603-606.
[10] 邓富强 李艺域 方志伟. 腹腔镜改良Soave短肌鞘术式治疗小儿先天性巨结肠的疗效、安全性及对排便功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 616-619.
[11] 许争 陆子龙 夏立明. 不同手术方式对女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌治疗效果及切口美容满意度的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 481-483.
[12] 谭成龙 赵庆国 孙思炜. 跟骨闭合性骨折术后软组织并发症发生的影响因素及列线图模型构建分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(4): 355-358.
[13] 黄晓媚 郭明 骆俊龙 包传恩 胡蒙. 血清血管内皮生长因子、胰岛素样生长因子-1水平与胸腔镜食管癌根治术后食管胃吻合口漏的相关性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 276-280.
[14] 赵添豪 赵纯. 多发恶性肿瘤次原发食管癌的生存预后分析:基于人群的分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 158-163.
[15] 江帆 谢柯祺. 布托啡诺调节CCL2-CCR2轴对食管癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(2): 168-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[2] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
[3] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[4] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[5] 杨钦;张再重;王烈. 空肠间置术在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[6] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[7] 叶向红;彭南海;李维勤. 早期肠内营养联合早期运动促进外科重症患者康复[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 960 .
[8] 唐健雄 . 疝和腹壁外科该怎样规范化的持续发展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 245 .
[9] 闵凯 . 疝修补材料学的新进展与疝外科手术的改进[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 257 .
[10] 苏福增 王志 张成等 . 嵌顿性腹股沟疝合并肾病综合征患者的围手术期处理 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 260 .