单侧双通道与经皮椎板间内镜治疗腰5骶1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.06.022

临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 634-638.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.06.022

单侧双通道与经皮椎板间内镜治疗腰5骶1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较

陈炯灰黄春明李小川姜成王伟陈永龙张镇武罗绍坚卢明南蓝根

525232 广东高州，广东医科大学附属高州市人民医院脊柱外科

收稿日期:2023-07-14 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-06-20
通讯作者: 黄春明，Email：13828605888@139.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81802130)；中国博士后科学基金(2018M630968)；广东省医学科学技术研究基金(B2023375)

Comparative study on short-term clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic in the treatment of L₅S₁ disc herniation

CHEN Jionghui,HUANG Chunming,LI Xiaochuang,JIANG Cheng,WANG Wei,CHEN Yonglong,ZHANG Zhenwu,LUO Shaojian,LU Mingnan,LAN Gen

Department of Spine Surgery,Gaozhou People’s Hospital,Guangdong Medical University，Gaozhou 525232，China

Received:2023-07-14 Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较单侧双通道内镜椎间盘切除术(unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy ,UBED)与经皮内镜椎板间入路椎间盘切除术(percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy,PEID)治疗腰5骶1(L₅S₁)腰椎间盘突出(lumbar disc herniation,LDH)的短期临床疗效。方法2019年1月~2021年1月我院分别应用UBED或PEID治疗的L₅S₁ LDH病人57例，其中UBED组30例，PEID组27例。比较两组病人手术时间、术中透视次数、术后住院时间和手术并发症，使用视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)比较两组病人术后生活质量，术后1.5年随访使用改良MacNab标准评价临床疗效。结果UBED组和PEID组手术时间分别为(75.30±8.44）分钟和（68.37±4.63）分钟，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。两组病人术后1周、术后3个月、术后1年及术后1.5年的VAS及ODI均较术前明显下降，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，除术后1周UBED组腰痛VAS评分高于PEID组[(3.87±1.14)分 vs (2.70±0.67)分](P＜0.05)，其余相同时间点的VAS及ODI比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；术后1.5年随访改良MacNab评定标准结果比较，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。PEID组出现2例硬膜撕裂，UBED组出现1例硬膜撕裂，PEID组术后出现1例神经根短暂损伤，均对症治疗后痊愈。结论与PEID比较，UBED手术时间更长，创伤更大，术后短期内腰痛更明显，并发症发生率低，透视次数少。两种术式对L₅S₁LDH的近期疗效接近，均为安全有效的手术方式。

关键词: 腰椎间盘突出；单侧双通道脊柱内镜；经皮椎板间脊柱内镜

Abstract: Objective To compare the short-term clinical effects of unilateral dual-channel endoscopic discectomy (UBED) and percutaneous endoscopic intervertebral discectomy (PEID) in the treatment of L₅S₁ Lumbar disc herniation,LDH.Methods From January 2019 to January 2021,a total of 57 cases of L₅S₁ LDH treated by UBED or PEID were analyzed retrospectively,including 30 cases in UBED group and 27 cases in PEID group.The operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,postoperative hospitalization days and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.The visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to compare the postoperative quality of life of the two groups,and the modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy in the last follow-up.Results The operation time of UBED group and PEID group was (75.30±8.44) minutes and (68.37±4.63) minutes, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).VAS and ODI of 1 week, 3 months, 1 year and 1.5 years after surgery in 2 groups were significantly decreased compared with those before surgery, with statistical significance (P<0.05).The VAS score of low back pain in UBED group was higher than that in PEID group [(3.87±1.14) points vs (2.70±0.67) points] at 1 week after surgery (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in VAS and ODI at the other time points (P>0.05).There was no statistical difference in the results of modified MacNab criteria in the last follow-up (P>0.05).There were 2 cases of dural tear in PEID group,1 case of dural tear in UBED group and 1 case of temporary nerve root injury in PEID group after operation,all of which were cured after symptomatic treatment.Conclusion Compared with PEID,UBED has a longer operation time,more trauma and more obvious low back pain in the short term after operation.The short-term curative effect of the two operations on L₅S₁LDH is similar,the incidence of complications is low,and the times of fluoroscopy are few.Both operations are safe and effective.

Key words: lumbar disc herniation；unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy；percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy

陈炯灰黄春明李小川姜成王伟陈永龙张镇武罗绍坚卢明南蓝根. 单侧双通道与经皮椎板间内镜治疗腰5骶1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(6): 634-638.

CHEN Jionghui,HUANG Chunming,LI Xiaochuang,JIANG Cheng,WANG Wei,CHEN Yonglong,ZHANG Zhenwu,LUO Shaojian,LU Mingnan,LAN Gen. Comparative study on short-term clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic in the treatment of L₅S₁ disc herniation[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2024, 32(6): 634-638.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

单侧双通道与经皮椎板间内镜治疗腰5骶1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较

Comparative study on short-term clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic in the treatment of L₅S₁ disc herniation

PDF (PC)

PDF (Mobile)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

单侧双通道与经皮椎板间内镜治疗腰5骶1椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效比较

Comparative study on short-term clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic in the treatment of L5S1 disc herniation

PDF (PC)

PDF (Mobile)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

Comparative study on short-term clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic in the treatment of L₅S₁ disc herniation