临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 490-493.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.05.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体P55、金属硫蛋白1E对雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归的影响

  

  1. 226500   江苏省如皋市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-04 修回日期:2023-05-04 接受日期:2023-05-04 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-05-25

Effect of serum tumor necrosis factor receptor P55 and metallothionein 1E on clinical outcome of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy

  1. Department of General Surgery,Rugao People's Hospital,Nantong,Jiangsu 226500,China
  • Received:2023-05-04 Revised:2023-05-04 Accepted:2023-05-04 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-25

摘要: 目的 探讨血清可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体P55(sTNFR-P55)、金属硫蛋白1E(MT1E)对雌激素受体(ER)阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归的影响。方法 2017年2月~2018年3月在本院治疗的ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人146例,依据术后临床转归情况分为复发转移组和未复发转移组,比较两组病人的临床资料、血清sTNFR-P55、MT1E水平。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归的相关因素。制作受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,以曲线下面积(AUC)分析血清sTNFRP55、MT1E及两者联合对ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归的预测价值。结果 截止随访结束,146例ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人共有32例发生复发转移。复发转移组肿瘤直径、肿瘤坏死因子α、糖类抗原125(CA125)、细胞角质蛋白19片段抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、肿瘤分期为Ⅲ期占比、血清sTNFR-P55、MT1E水平均高于未复发转移组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,CYFRA21-1(OR=2.768,95%CI 1.107~6.920)、CEA(OR=2.751,95%CI 1.101~6.879)、肿瘤分期为Ⅲ期(OR=3.611,95%CI 1.444~9.029)、sTNFR-P55(OR=3.343,95%CI 1.337~8.361)及MT1E(OR=3.267,95%CI 1.307~8.169)均为影响ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归的相关因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清sTNFR-P55、MT1E及两者联合对ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归预测的灵敏度分别为78.12%(95%CI 59.56~90.06)、75.00%(95%CI 56.25~87.87)、71.88%(95%CI 53.02~85.60),特异度分别为63.16%(95%CI 53.56~71.85)、75.44%(95%CI 66.32~82.80)、96.49%(95%CI 90.73~98.87),AUC分别为0.723(95%CI 0.642~0.793)、0.760(95%CI 0.682~0.827)、0.880(95%CI 0.816~0.928)。〖HTH〗结论〓〖HTSS〗血清sTNFRP55、MT1E与ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归有关,且血清sTNFRP55、MT1E两者联合对ER阳性乳腺癌根治术病人临床转归预测效能较高。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 雌激素受体阳性, 乳腺癌根治术, 可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体P55, 金属硫蛋白1E, 临床转归

Abstract: Objective  To investigate the effect of serum soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor P55(sTNFR-P55) and metallothionein 1E(MT1E) on the clinical outcome of estrogen receptor(ER) positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy.Methods The clinical data of 146 patients with ER positive breast cancer who were treated in our hospital from February 2017 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the clinical outcome of patients after surgery,they were divided into recurrent metastatic group and non-recurrent metastatic group.The clinical data,serum sTNFR-P55 and MT1E levels were compared between patients with recurrent metastatic group and non-recurrent metastatic group.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors influencing the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy.The receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) was made,and the area under the curve(AUC) was used to analyze the predictive value of serum sTNFR-P55,MT1E and their combination on the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical surgery.Results By the end of follow-up,32 of 146 patients with ER positive breast cancer had recurrence and metastasis.Tumor size and levels of tumor necrosis factor- α,carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125),cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1(CYFRA21-1),carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),tumor stage Ⅲ,serum sTNFR-P55 and MT1E in the recurrent metastatic group were higher than those in the non-recurrent metastatic group(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic  analysis showed that CYFRA21-1(OR=2.768,95%CI 1.107-6.920),CEA(OR=2.751,95%CI 1.101-6.879),tumor stage Ⅲ(OR=3.611,95%CI 1.444-9.029),sTNFR-P55(OR=3.343,95%CI 1.337-8.361) and MT1E(OR=3.267,95%CI 1.307-8.169) were all related factors affecting the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical surgery(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis results showed that the sensitivity of serum sTNFR-P55,MT1E and their combination in predicting the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical surgery was 78.12%(95%CI 59.56-90.06),75.00%(95%CI 56.25-87.87) and 71.88%(95%CI 53.02-85.60),respectively.The specificity was 63.16%(95%CI 53.56-71.85),75.44%(95%CI 66.32-82.80) and 96.49%(95%CI 90.73-98.87),respectively.AUC- was 0.723(95%CI 0.642-0.793),0.760(95%CI 0.682-0.827) and 0.880(95%CI 0.816-0.928) respectively.Conclusion Serum sTNFR-P55 and MT1E are related to the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy,and the combination of serum sTNFR-P55 and MT1E is more effective in predicting the clinical outcome of ER positive breast cancer patients undergoing radical mastectomy.

Key words: breast cancer, estrogen receptor positive, radical mastectomy for breast cancer, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor P55, metallothionein 1E, clinical outcome

[1] 杨丽 马强 张春霞 郑永财 张辉. 超声造影体表定位联合纳米炭示踪行前哨淋巴结活检在cN0期浸润性乳腺癌病人中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(5): 476-479.
[2] 饶南燕. 乳腺癌术后乳房重建自体皮瓣设计与术后管理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 231-233.
[3] 张晴 杜正贵. 乳腺癌乳房整形腔镜手术的探索与新思维[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 234-236.
[4] 蒋炳涧. 整形保乳手术在早期乳腺癌治疗中的效果和复发率分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 240-243.
[5] 李永峰 汤鸿超 夏文杰 仲妙春 孟旭莉. 美国国立综合癌症网络临床实践指南:乳腺癌(2023.V4) 更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 17-21.
[6] 陈香蓉 刘泽宇 吕欣霖 田春祥 宁平. 误诊为乳腺炎的妊娠期晚期乳腺癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 82-83.
[7] 姜春峰 张娜 邢鑫 张玉萍 宋蕾. 长链非编码RNA SLC26A4反义RNA 1通过Notch信号抑制乳腺癌细胞增殖与转移[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 834-837.
[8] 曹思旸 刘霞 钟洁愉 刘晓岭 孙德胜 韦伟. 超声造影联合新型钩针探索精细化早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 724-728.
[9] 时雪亮 黄勤杰 陈慰慈 施超. 前哨淋巴结活检联合保乳术与改良根治术治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱ期乳腺癌的近远期疗效及对创伤后应激障碍的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 432-435.
[10] 洪晨忱 俞鑫 姚峰. Ras相关的C3肉毒素底物2作为乳腺癌潜在预后标志物:基于免疫组织化学分析和生物信息学的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1185-1190.
[11] 沈苏琴 丁玲玲 汪晓曼. 泛素偶联酶E2C及非转移细胞基因2与乳腺癌临床病理特征关系及其在预后评估中的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(11): 1044-1048.
[12] 戴继鑫 牛凯. 拉帕替尼联合曲妥珠单抗治疗人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌病人的疗效及生存预后分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(11): 1061-1064.
[13] 刘晓岭 邓爱诗 韦伟. 2022.V4版美国国立综合癌症网络乳腺癌临床实践指南:外科部分解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 24-27.
[14] 皮美辰 陈文馨 柳周 等. N-myc下游调节基因2对巨噬细胞极化及乳腺癌增殖、侵袭和迁移的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 68-72.
[15] 沈浩元 胡超华. 乳腺癌外科治疗十大热点[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 97-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[2] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[3] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[4] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[5] 陈海滨;吕松岑. 全膝关节置换术术中止血药物的应用策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 800 .
[6] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[7] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[8] 张重捷;陈杰;邹奇;等. 两种微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 869 .
[9] 沙米尔;丁佑铭;汪斌;等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜两种术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 872 .
[10] 陆林;叶哲伟;安颍;等. Ⅰ期前后路联合手术治疗复杂下颈椎骨折脱位伴关节突绞锁[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 875 .