临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 324-326.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.03.028

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

3D打印在上颌窦壁重建修复中的应用价值分析

李巧玉 王颖东   

  1. 710054 西安交通大学附属红会医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-18 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 王颖东,Email:wang.19920830@163.com

The application value of 3D printing in the reconstruction of maxillary sinus wall

LI Qiaoyu,WANG Yingdong   

  1. Department of Otolaryngology,Head and Neck Surgery,Red Society Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710054,China
  • Received:2023-04-18 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-20

摘要: 目的 探讨3D打印在上颌窦壁重建修复中的准确性和病人满意度。方法 2022年4月~2022年11月我院收诊的上颌窦壁重建修复病人52例,按CT三维重建以及3D打印影像重建两种不同方式将52例病人分为常规组和观察组。每组各26例。常规组采用128层CT三维重建检查进行诊断,观察组采用3D打印影像(3D printing images,3DPI)进行重建检查诊断。统计各组病人使用不同方法下的诊断效能,对两组上颌窦壁重建修复病人进行重建修复咀嚼功能、语言功能和固位功能指标进行对比,调查总满意度。结果 观察组咀嚼功能、语言功能和固位功能评分均高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);常规组满意度为26.92%,观察组为80.76%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 3D打印影像用于上颌窦壁重建修复临床效果显著,病人满意度较高。

关键词: 疗效;修复;上颌窦壁;临床;重建;3D打印

Abstract: Objective Exploring the clinical diagnostic effect and patients’ satisfaction of 3D printing reconstruction examination intervention in maxillary sinus wall repair.Methods 52 patients with maxillary sinus wall repair admitted to our hospital from April 2022 to November 2022 were collected as research subjects.52 patients were divided into a control group and an observation group using two different methods: CT 3D reconstruction and 3D printed image reconstruction. Each group has 26 cases.The conventional group was diagnosed using 128 slice CT 3D reconstruction examination,while the observation group was diagnosed using 3D printing images (3DPI) reconstruction examination.Medical staff counted the diagnostic efficacy of each group of patients using different methods,and conducted a survey on the overall satisfaction of patients with diagnosis.Results The scores of masticatory function, language function and retention function in observation group were higher than those in conventional group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The satisfaction of the conventional group was 26.92%, and that of the observation group was 80.76%, and there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion The scores of masticatory function, language function and retention function in observation group were higher than those in conventional group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The satisfaction of the conventional group was 26.92%, and that of the observation group was 80.76%, and there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).

Key words: efficacy; repair; maxillary sinus wall; clinical; reconstruction; 3D printing

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!