临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 318-322.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.03.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶联合负压封闭引流的临床疗效观察

郭忠梁 刘元媛 刘应平 王静 徐敏 王国昌   

  1. 629000 四川省遂宁市中心医院烧伤整形外科(郭忠梁、 刘应平、王静、徐敏、王国昌), 医疗美容科(刘元媛)
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-29 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘元媛,Email:11690361@qq.com

Clinical effect of platelet-rich plasma gel combined with vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of patients with sinus of thoracic wall

GUO Zhongliang,LIU Yuanyuan,LIU Yingping,WANG Jing,XU Min,WANG Guochang   

  1. Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Suining Central Hospital,Sichuan,Suining 629000,China
  • Received:2023-05-29 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-20

摘要: 目的 探讨胸壁窦道病人应用富血小板血浆凝胶(APG)联合负压封闭引流(VSD)的临床疗效。方法 2019年10月~2021年3月收治的胸壁窦道病人89例,采用随机数表法分为观察组(45例)及对照组(44例),对照组采用VSD治疗,观察组采用APG联合VSD治疗,比较两组胸壁窦道愈合情况。结果 观察组和对照组总有效率分别为97.78% 和86.36%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组窦道封闭时间、创面愈合时间、住院时间分别为(15.26±2.33)天、(25.19±3.54)天和(41.26±5.33)天,短于对照组的(27.26±3.05)天、(43.26±5.17)天和(58.64±6.11)天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组二次修复手术率、窦道复发率均为0,低于对照组的11.36%和13.64%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后2周观察组C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、疼痛评分(VAS)分别为(20.36±3.41)mg/L、(5.23±0.64)×109、(15.26±3.24)pg/ml和(1.23±0.25)分,低于对照组的(26.54±3.57)mg/L、(8.17±0.93)×109、(24.16±3.94)pg/ml、(3.04±0.41)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后1周、2周创面细菌培养阳性率分别为37.78%、11.11%,低于对照组的59.09%、29.55%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组创面愈合后1个月、2个月瘢痕评分(VSS)分别为(7.33±0.85)分、(3.26±0.41)分,低于对照组的(8.64±0.91)分和(5.14±0.62)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为8.89%,低于对照组的25.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 胸壁窦道病人采用APG联合VSD治疗,可促进窦道修复,抑菌效果较佳,减轻疼痛及瘢痕增生状态,并降低不良反应。

关键词: 胸壁窦道;富血小板血浆凝胶;负压封闭引流

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of platelet-rich plasma gel (APG) combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of patients with sinus of thoracic wall. Methods A total of 89 patients with sinus of thoracic wall who were admitted to the department of plastic surgery of the hospital between October 2019 and March 2021 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into observation group (n=45) and control group (n=44) by random number table method. The control group was treated with VSD, and the observation group was treated with APG combined with VSD. The healing of sinus of thoracic wall was compared between the two groups. Results The curative effect was significantly different in the two groups (97.78% vs. 86.36, P<0.05). The sinus closure time, wound healing time and hospital stay of observation group [(15.26±2.33) d, (25.19±3.54) d and (41.26±5.33) d] were significantly shorter than those of control group [(27.26±3.05) d, (43.26±5.17) d and (58.64±6.11) d] (P<0.05). The rate of secondary repair surgery and recurrence rate of sinus tract in observation group (0 and 0) were lower than those in control group (11.36% and 13.64%) (P<0.05). After treatment, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in the observation group [(20.36±3.41) mg/L, (5.23±0.64) ×109, (15.26±3.24) pg/mL and (1.23±0.25)] were significantly lower than those in the control group [(26.54±3.57) mg/L, (8.17±0.93)×109, (24.16±3.94) pg/mL and (3.04±0.41)] (P<0.05). 1w and 2w after treatment, the positive rates of bacterial culture in observation group (37.78% and 11.11%) were lower than those in control group (59.09% and 29.55%) (P<0.05). The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) of observation group at 1 month and 2 months after wound healing [(7.33±0.85) and (3.26±0.41)] were significantly lower than those of control group [(8.64±0.91) and (5.14±0.62)] (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in observation group (8.89%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.00%) (P<0.05).Conclusion APG combined with VSD can promote the recovery of sinus tract in patients with sinus of thoracic wall, with good antibacterial effect. In addition, it can relieve pain and scar hypertrophy, and reduce adverse reactions.

Key words: sinus of thoracic wall; platelet-rich plasma gel; vacuum sealing drainage

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!