临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 203-205.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.02.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

皮桥预开窗引流对混合痔外剥内扎术后康复的影响

  

  1. 431700  湖北中医药大学附属天门市中医医院肛肠科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-09 修回日期:2023-07-09 接受日期:2023-07-09 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 肖海涛,Email:425400935@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫生健康委员会中医药科研项目(ZY2021M084)

Clinical study of skin bridge preopening window drainage in enhanced recovery of mixed hemorrhoids surgically treated with external dissection and internal ligation

  1. Department of Anorectal,Tianmen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hubei,Tianmen 431700,China
  • Received:2023-07-09 Revised:2023-07-09 Accepted:2023-07-09 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-02-20

摘要: 目的 探讨皮桥预开窗引流对混合痔外剥内扎术后康复的影响。方法 2021年3月1日~2022年2月28日我院收治外剥内扎术治疗的混合痔病人620例,根据病人办理入院时随机产生住院号尾数的单、双号分为观察组(304例)和对照组(316例)。观察组在对照组常规手术和药物治疗基础上,参照统一评估标准,依据术中对肛门皮桥评估情况,大部分选择实施皮桥预开窗引流。术后采用症状、体征评分量表评估病人肛门水肿和疼痛情况。比较两组病人肛门水肿、肛门疼痛和术后住院时间等。结果 观察组和对照组日均水肿评分分别为0.56分和1.2分,日均疼痛评分分别为0.6分和(1.201+0.289)分,术后平均住院时间分别为8天和10天,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 皮桥预开窗引流可减轻混合痔外剥内扎术后病人肛门水肿和疼痛程度,提高临床疗效,缩短术后住院时间。

关键词: 皮桥, 预开窗引流法, 混合痔, 外剥内扎术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical application of skin bridge preopening window drainage in enhanced recovery of mixed hemorrhoids surgically treated with external dissection and internal ligation.Methods A total of 620 patients with mixed hemorrhoids surgically treated with external dissection and internal ligation were retrospectively analyzed from March 1, 2021-February 28, 2022.Patients were divided into the observation group (n=304) and the control group(n=316)  according to the single and even numbers randomly generated at the time of admission.In the observation group,on the basis of conventional operation and drug treatment in the control group,most of them chose to implement preopening window drainage of the skin bridge according to the intraoperative evaluation of the anal skin  bridge according to the unified evaluation criteria.Symptom sign scoring scale used to evaluate the anal edema and pain after the operation.To compare and analyze differences in anal edema,anal pain and the postoperative hospital stay between the observation group  and the control.Results The average daily edema scores of the observation group and the control group were 0.56 and 1.2 points,respectively.The average daily edema score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group ,with the statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The average daily pain scores of the observation group and the control group were 0.6 and 1.201+0.289 points,respectively.The average daily pain score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,with the statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The average hospitalization days of the observation group and the control group were 8 days and 10 days,respectively.The average length of stay in the observation group was less than that in the control group,with the statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusion Skin bridge preopening window drainage can effectively relieve the degree of anal edema and pain in patients with mixed hemorrhoids surgically treated with external dissection and internal ligation,improve clinical efficacy,shorten the postoperative hospital stay.It has practical value and clinical significance for enhanced recovery.

Key words: skin bridge, preopening window drainage procedure, mixed hemorrhoids, external dissection and internal ligation

[1] 李毅 李文忠 罗仕云 陈旭渊 师路 何家杰 冯骄 李林浦 胡伟. 改良吻合器痔上黏膜环切术联合部分肛门内括约肌切断术治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效及安全性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(11): 1049-1052.
[2] 张江川 张春梅. 右美托咪定在侧卧位静脉麻醉下混合痔切除术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 690-692.
[3] 赵甜甜 房学东 金殷植 于威. Hartmann手术治疗痔切除术后大出血一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 700-700.
[4] 胡江林 朱静芳 袁海涛 邓明 童端 周凯亮. 痔上黏膜环切术加外痔分段切除血栓剥离治疗急性嵌顿性混合痔的效果观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 263-265.
[5] 赵晓光 闫飞虎 于恩达等. PPH术治疗环状痔的临床研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(3): 184-186.
[6] 马振勇 马德安. PPH术治疗环状混合痔136例临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(10): 726-726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 栾杰. 当前国内乳房再造的几个原则与技术问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1101 -1102 .
[2] 何雨竹, 倪鑫, 张潍平. 儿童先天性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻性肾积水手术治疗策略研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 501 -504 .
[3] 马先桃 李师亮 严丽 朱章强 冯异 程才. 杂交技术在StanfordA型主动脉夹层的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1101 -1103 .
[4] 闵心平 夏军 朱铁源 胡知朋 李博文 徐鹏 王志维. 急性重症肺栓塞外科治疗八例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1132 -1134 .
[5] 李疆 曹英豪 邓胜和 蔡开琳. 胃下部癌No.6组淋巴结分拣特点和转移危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 830 -834 .
[6] 解东阳 张兵强 李韶山. 基于SEER数据库的壶腹周围癌预后预测模型的构建[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 659 -665 .
[7] 梁宾勇 陈孝平. 免疫治疗时代肝癌外科治疗的机遇与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(10): 901 -903 .
[8] 魏萌萌 吕志坤 李国珍 胡雪艳 许倩倩 郭静 耿彪. 血清血管生成素样蛋白8、血管细胞黏附分子-1水平联合检测对颅内动脉瘤栓塞术后脑血管痉挛的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1133 -1136 .
[9] 方滢 叶哲伟 陈孝平. 科学技术对现代外科学发展的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 1 -5 .
[10] 瞿伟峰 史颖弘 樊嘉. 美国国立综合癌症网络临床实践指南:肝细胞癌(2023.V2)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(1): 6 -9 .