临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 553-556.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.06.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

多种能量器械在甲状腺癌手术应用中的对比分析

  

  1. 277000 山东健康集团枣庄中心医院甲状腺乳腺外科(曹磊、李文);天津医科大学肿瘤医院颌面耳鼻喉肿瘤科(骆惊涛、柯创武、张泽)
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-07 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 曹磊 ,Email: caolei2021ye@163.com

Comparative analysis of multiple energy equipments used in thyroid cancer surgery

  1. Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery,Zaozhuang Central Hospital,Shandong Healthy Group,Shandong,Zaozhuang 277000, China
  • Received:2022-07-07 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-06-20

摘要: 目的 对比分析直型双极电凝镊、Focus超声刀及高频电刀在甲状腺癌手术中的应用效果。方法 选择2020年5月~2021年4月接受甲状腺癌标准根治术的病人165例,随机分为双极电凝组、超声刀组及电刀组,每组各55例。对三组病例一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流时间、总引流量、术前、术后甲状旁腺素水平、血清钙离子水平、术后并发症发生率及单项费用进行对比分析。结果 三组手术均成功完成;双极电凝组与超声刀组术后甲状旁腺素水平、血清钙离子水平、术后并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),双极电凝组单项费用高于超声刀组;双极电凝组、超声刀组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流时间、总引流量、术后甲状旁腺素水平、血清钙离子水平及并发症发生率均小于电刀组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),双极电凝组单项费用高于电刀组。结论 三组能量器械均能顺利完成手术,达到治疗目的,在手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流时间、总引流量、术后甲状旁腺素、血清钙离子及并发症发生率方面直型双极电凝镊及Focus超声刀较高频电刀具有优势;在经济方面,直型双极电凝镊虽然稍高于高频电刀,但较Focus超声刀具有明显优势;在精细解剖方面,直型双极电凝镊具有优势。

关键词: 能量器械, 直型双极电凝镊, Focus超声刀, 高频电刀, 甲状腺癌手术

Abstract: Objective Comparative analysis of the application effects of straight bipolar coagulation forceps,Focus ultrasonic equipment and high frequency electrosurgical equipment in thyroid cancer surgery. Methods Select 165 patients accept standard radical resection of thyroid cancer from May 2020 to April 2021.Divide randomly into bipolar electrocoagulation group,ultrasonic equipment group and electrosurgical equipment group,with 55 cases in each group.The general patient’s information of the three groups are operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage time,total drainage,preoperative and postoperative parathyroid hormone value,serum calcium ion value,postoperative complication rate and individual costs.This study conducts a comparative analysis of these indicators. Results The three groups of operations were successfully completed;the bipolar electrocoagulation group and the ultrasonic equipment group have significant differences in the postoperative parathyroid hormone value,serum calcium ion value,and postoperative complication rate,and they were statistically significant(P< 0.05),the rest of the indicators were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Among them,the single cost of the bipolar electrocoagulation group is higher than that of the ultrasonic equipment group.The first two groups are compared with the electrosurgical equipment group and find that the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative Drainage time,total drainage volume,postoperative parathyroid hormone value,serum calcium ion value,and complication rate are all lower than those in the electrosurgical group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the individual cost is higher than that in the electrosurgical group. Conclusion All three groups of energy devices can successfully complete the operation and achieve the treatment goals.In the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage time,total drainage,postoperative parathyroid hormone value,serum calcium ion value and complications In terms of efficiency,straight bipolar coagulation forceps and Focus ultrasonic scalpel have advantages in higher frequency electrosurgical units.In terms of economy,straight bipolar coagulation forceps are slightly higher than high frequency electrosurgicals,but they have obvious advantages over Focus ultrasonic scalpels.Straight bipolar coagulation forceps has an absolute advantage in fine anatomy.

Key words: energy equipment, straight bipolar coagulation forceps, Focus ultrasonic equipment, high frequency electrosurgical equipment, thyroid cancer surgery

[1] 林陆添 刘小飞 凌云浩 巫国庆. 分段止血联合高频电刀在上肢烧伤病人切削痂术中的止血疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1188-1191.
[2] 刘世强 区小卫 蒙丽婵. FOCUS超声刀在初次甲状腺功能亢进手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(5): 340-340.
[3] 任晔 郭风劲 游洪波 王江 陈剑锋 陈安民. 离子冷凝刀和高频电刀在膝关节镜手术中的初步临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 131-131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[3] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[4] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[5] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[6] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[7] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[8] 万松林;刘韦成;吴云华;等. 胃间质瘤腹腔内破裂出血一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 807 .
[9] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[10] 曹志新. 基于膜解剖的胃癌D2手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 812 .