临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 528-532.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.06.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

直肠癌会阴切口重建及肠造口关闭术中十字缝合法应用效果及安全性研究

  

  1. 537000 广西玉林市红十字会医院结直肠肛门外科(李晓和、杨胜富、粟业能、徐绍强),普外科(冯广革)
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-05 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 冯广革,Email:L13481541982@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20190131)

Study on the effect and safety of “cross” suture in reconstruction of perineal incision and closure of enterostomy for rectal cancer

  1. Department of Colorectal and anal surgery,Yulin Red Cross Hospital,Yulin,Guangxi 537000, China
  • Received:2022-11-05 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-06-20

摘要: 目的 分析直肠癌会阴切口重建及肠造口关闭术中十字缝合法应用效果及安全性。方法 2019年1月~2022年1月本院收治的直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术中会阴切口重建和肠造口关闭术中腹部切口重建病人107例。分为造口传统组12例、造口十字组14例、重建传统组37例、重建十字组44例。术后随访30天,对比各组效果。结果 造口十字组、重建十字组手术时长、切口愈合时间、术后拔管时间、术后住院时间均短于造口传统组、重建传统组,术中出血量少于造口传统组、重建传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。造口十字组、重建十字组术后1、2、3天时数字评价量表(NRS)评分均低于造口传统组、重建传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。造口十字组、重建十字组术后切口瘢痕色泽、厚度、血管、柔软度以及总分低于造口传统组、重建传统组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重建十字组术后并发症发生率为6.82%,低于重建传统组的24.32%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。造口传统组与造口十字组并发症总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 十字缝合法用于腹会阴联合切除术和肠造口关闭术中切口重建,兼具通畅引流和减张缝合的特点,可降低术后并发症发生率。

关键词: 直肠癌, 会阴切口重建, 肠造口关闭术, 十字缝合法, 安全性

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect and safety of “cross” suture in the reconstruction of perineal incision and closure of enterostomy for rectal cancer. Methods A total of 107 patients with perineal incision reconstruction during combined abdominal perineal resection and abdominal incision reconstruction during enterostomy closure treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected.They were divided into traditional stoma group (12 cases),stoma “cross” group (14 cases),traditional reconstruction group (37 cases) and reconstruction “cross” group (44 cases).Follow up for 30 days after operation to compare the effects of each group. Results The operation time,incision healing time,postoperative extubation time,and postoperative hospital stay in the ostomy “cross” group and the reconstruction “cross” group were shorter than those in the traditional ostomy group and the reconstruction traditional group,and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the traditional ostomy group and the reconstruction traditional group (P<0.05).The NRS score of the “cross group” and the  reconstruction“cross group” 1,2 and 3 days after surgery was lower than that of the traditional group and the traditional reconstruction group (P<0.05).The color,thickness,blood vessels,softness and total score of postoperative incision in the “cross group” and the reconstruction“cross group” were lower than those in the traditional group and the traditional reconstruction group (P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the reconstruction “cross” group was 6.82%,significantly lower than that in the traditional reconstruction group (24.32%) (P<0.05).There was no difference in the total incidence of complications between the traditional stoma group and the stoma “cross” group (P>0.05). Conclusion “Cross” suture can be used for incision reconstruction during combined abdominal perineal resection and enterostomy closure.It has the characteristics of “unobstructed drainage” and “reduced tension suture”,and can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Key words: rectal cancer, perineal incision reconstruction, enterostomy closure, cross seam method, security

[1] 邓涛 何杰. 改良的完整保留邓氏筋膜的创新直肠系膜切除手术在直肠癌中的应用效果[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 533-536.
[2] 赵飞龙 吴文雅 田君 徐晓忠 鲍乐峰. 经自然腔道取标本手术对比传统腹腔镜手术在结直肠癌中的优势性及安全性分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 538-541.
[3] 柳万忠 龙煊 邓志刚. 结直肠癌组织转录因子E2F2、黏蛋白样受体2水平与病人临床病理特征的关系及对淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 542-545.
[4] 司宇光 吴国庆 袁成龙. 不同腹部辅助性切口对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人肠道功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-356.
[5] 姬生威 王萍. 转移性结直肠癌并消化道穿孔的多因素Logistic分析及预测模型的构建与验证 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 275-278.
[6] 李亮 林昌伟 龙飞 胡桂 郭一航 刘希 李小荣. 美国国立综合癌症网络临床实践指南:结直肠癌筛查(2022.V2)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 14-17.
[7] 吴国庆 周思成 张景 陈海鹏 郑朝旭 周海涛 裴炜 梁建伟. 术前化疗后行细胞减灭术联合腹腔热灌注化疗治疗结直肠癌腹膜转移的安全性及疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 823-828.
[8] 李博文 韩元圣 黄高俊 郑磊. 微小RNA-370-3p和Toll样受体4在结直肠癌组织中的表达及临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 860-864.
[9] 吴永力 方汉刚 陈静 闫瑞承. 术前外周血微小RNA-21、血管内皮生长-因子、糖类抗原19-9水平与JP3结直肠癌病人临床分期和术后复发转移的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 771-774.
[10] 许曦鸣 宋春光 王磊. 监测直肠癌病人术中脑氧饱和度及血清血红素加氧酶 -1、超氧化物歧化酶含量对术后认知功能的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 556-559.
[11] 汪宏 周翔 谈世刚 殷国江 周丹 吴明春 夏中元. 预注甘露醇对机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人视神经鞘直径和复苏质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 561-564.
[12] 任俊 吴敬 金田力 付涛. 长链非编码RNA在结直肠癌中的诊断价值和作用机制[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 596-599.
[13] 黎淑玲 罗劲根 刘俊杰. 十字缝合法在肠造口回纳中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 357-359.
[14] 员海超 王燕 胡祎民 倪梁朝 杨尚琪. 负压吸引鞘碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石的疗效及安全性评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 118-120.
[15] 张晓南 杭嘉敏 毋茜 苏翠萍 呼艳飞 张丽. 肿瘤部位、体质量指数与结直肠癌病人根治术后预后的相关性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1147-1151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[3] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[4] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[5] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[6] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .
[7] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[8] 周观金;彭昊;陈森. 全膝关节置换治疗膝关节炎术后早期镇痛的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 804 .
[9] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[10] 万松林;刘韦成;吴云华;等. 胃间质瘤腹腔内破裂出血一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 807 .