临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 267-270.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.03.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

开放腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染B超和CT联合诊断的应用价值

  

  1. 716000 延安大学医学院(崔航);陕西省人民医院普外一科(崔航、支洲航、韩万林、李小军),B超室(刘波),CT室(张艳)
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-01 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 李小军,Email:lixiaojun20040912@163.com

The value of combined ultrasound and CT diagnosis of mesh infection after the open tension-free repair of inguinal hernia

  1. Medical School,Yan'an University,Shaanxi,Yan'an 716000,China
  • Received:2022-06-01 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-03-20

摘要: 目的 探讨开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染B超和CT联合诊断的应用价值。方法 开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后确诊补片感染病人83例,术前均行B超和腹部CT检查,且以术中证实为确诊标准,比较B超、CT及其联合检查对开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的诊断价值。结果 83例病人中,B超诊断补片感染符合率75.90%(63/83);CT诊断补片感染符合率为86.74%(72/83),B超联合CT诊断诊断补片感染符合率为87.95%(73/83)。B超、CT、B超联合CT预判补片感染深度与手术中证实结果相比的准确度、灵敏度、特异度、Kappa值分别为88.76%、75.73%、90.58%、0.695;91.16%、80.96%、93.06%、0.774; 91.97%、83.52%、93.64%、0.795。联合检查对诊断开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术术后补片感染的应用价值优于单独超声检查和单独CT检查,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 B超联合CT诊断开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后补片感染的应用价值优于单独超声检查和单独CT检查。

关键词: 腹股沟疝, 开放式无张力修补术, 补片感染, CT检查, B超检查, 联合诊断

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application value of combined ultrasound and CT diagnosis of mesh infection after open inguinal hernia tensionless repair.Methods 83 patients admitted to our hospital with confirmed patch infection after tension-free repair of open inguinal hernia were studied,all of whom underwent preoperative ultrasound and abdominal CT examination,and intraoperative confirmation was the diagnostic criteria.To compare the value of ultrasonography, CT and combined examination in the diagnosis of mesh infection after open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Results Among the 83 patients,the compliance rate of ultrasound diagnosis of mesh infection was 75.90%(63/83 cases);the compliance rate of CT diagnosis of mesh infection was 86.74%(72/83 cases);and the compliance rate of ultrasound combined with CT diagnosis of mesh infection was 87.95%(73/83 cases).The accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,and kappa values of ultrasound,CT,and ultrasound combined with CT in predicting the depth of mesh infection compared with the results confirmed during surgery were 88.76%,75.73%,90.58%,and 0.695;91.16%,80.96%,93.06%,and 0.774;and 91.97%,83.52%,93.64%,and 0.795.The combined examination was better than ultrasonography alone and CT alone in the diagnosis of postoperative mesh infection after open inguinal hernia repair(P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound combined with CT is better than ultrasound alone and CT alone in diagnosing mesh infection after open inguinal hernia repair without tension.

Key words: inguinal hernia, open tension-free repair, mesh infection, CT examination, B-ultrasonography, combined examination

[1] 胡宗云. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 264-266.
[2] 黄毅 胡勇 程腾 曹迟 章锐. 液体分离联合纱布剥离在腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 271-274.
[3] 张肖. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后迟发性小肠瘘一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 299-299.
[4] 邱欣国 崔喆. 轻量立体3D补片对腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝病人并发症、疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1068-1071.
[5] 尚培中 赵臣 蒋童新 宋创业. 脐内侧襞腹外疝一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 69-70.
[6] 金曜 汪翰 杨帆 陶凯雄 张弦. 腹腔镜技术在嵌顿性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 857-859.
[7] 刘景平, 万智恒, 李瑞斌. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 158-160.
[8] 过晓强, 华玉明. 右侧腹股沟斜疝继发大网膜扭转梗死一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 168-169.
[9] 林福利. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝685例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 186-187.
[10] 赫萌 颜登国. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后乙状结肠瘘一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1210-1210.
[11] 吕志强 沈根海 戴玮 王刚 高泉根. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝:单中心1021例报道[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 666-668.
[12] 姚建锋, 田利飞, 张晓龙等. 基于单中心的不同手术组人员成人腹股沟疝修补术现状调查[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 572-574.
[13] 黄燕涛, 冷媛媛, 彭止戈等. 多发性腹膜包涵囊肿一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 600-600.
[14] 余俊英. 有高复发风险因素的腹股沟疝的治疗(附25例报告)[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 175-176.
[15] 田利飞 屈亚琦 徐庆学 赵旭 权攀 姚建锋. 特定情景扶镜法在腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1157-1159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!