临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 835-838.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.09.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

膜解剖技术在胃癌根治术中应用的效果分析

  

  1. 4420001 十堰,湖北医药学院附属人民医院胃肠外科(莫波、王佩、何志军、梁俊、郝志楠);华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院胃肠外科(童宜欣)
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-03 接受日期:2021-11-03 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 王佩,Email:wangpei0006@163.com

Analysis of the effects of membrane anatomy in radical resection of gastric cancer on reducing complications

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine,Hubei,Shiyan 442001,China
  • Received:2021-11-03 Accepted:2021-11-03 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-14

摘要: 目的 探讨膜解剖在胃癌根治术应用的效果。方法 2018年8月~2020年10月我院收治的的胃癌病人146例,根据1∶1随机信封抽签原则将病人分为膜解剖组和对照组,每组各73例。膜解剖组在膜解剖理论指导下行腹腔镜胃癌根治术,对照组行传统血管导向下腹腔镜胃癌根治术,比较两组围手术期相关指标及转期预后。结果 膜解剖组的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫个数、术后排气时间、术后下床时间与术后住院时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。膜解剖组术后7天的切口感染、肺部感染、腹腔出血、吻合口漏等并发症发生率为2.7%,低于对照组的21.9%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。膜解剖组术后1天、术后3天、术后7天的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。膜解剖组术后1天、术后3天、术后7天的血清高迁移率族蛋白B1(high mobility group protein B1,hMGB1)含量低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访截止时膜解剖组的复发率、死亡率分别为为16.4%、8.2%,对照组分别为31.5%和20.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 胃癌根治术应用膜解剖能有效降低并发症的发生,减少手术创伤,促进病20220213人康复,也能有效缓解疼痛与抑制hMGB1的释放,降低复发率、死亡率。

关键词: 膜解剖, 胃癌, 腹腔镜下根治术, 并发症, 高迁移率族蛋白B1, 疼痛, 复发〖

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of membrane dissection in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods From August 2018 to October 2020,146 cases of patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital were selected as the research objects.All the patients were divided into membrane anatomy group and control group with 73 cases each groups accorded to the 1∶1 random envelope drawing principle.The membrane anatomy group were underwent laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery under the guidance of membrane anatomy theory,and the control group were received traditional vascular guided laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery,and were to record and follow-up the prognosis of patients. Results The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph nodes dissected,postoperative exhaust time,postoperative time to get out of bed and postoperative hospital stay in the membrane anatomy group were less than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications such as incision infection,lung infection,abdominal hemorrhage,and anastomotic leakage in the membrane anatomy group were 2.7%,which were lower than 21.9% in the control group at 7 d after operation(P<0.05).The pain visual analogue scale(VAS) scores of the membrane anatomy group at 1 d,3 d,and 7 d were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).The levels of serum high mobility group protein B1(hMGB1) in the membrane anatomy group at 1d,3d and 7d after operation were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).All patients were followed up until October 1,2021.The recurrence rate and mortality rate of the membrane anatomy group were 16.4% and 8.2%,which were lower than those of the control group,31.5% and 20.5%(P<0.05). Conclusion The application of membrane anatomy in radical gastric cancer surgery can effectively reduce the occurrence of complications,reduce surgical trauma,and promote patient recovery.It can also effectively relieve pain and inhibit the release of hMGB-1,thereby reducing the follow-up recurrence rate and mortality of patients.

Key words: membrane anatomy, gastric cancer, laparoscopic radical resection, complications, high mobility group protein B1, pain, recurrence

[1] 张再重 林晨 王烈. 联合脏器切除在进展期胃癌治疗中的意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 813-814.
[2] 黄昌明 林国生 黄泽宁 陆俊. 吲哚菁绿标记荧光示踪技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 815-818.
[3] 周岩冰. 机器人和4K腹腔镜在胃癌根治术中淋巴结清扫的比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 819-822.
[4] 蔺金军 刘俊华 慕立峰 黄占有 魏军龙 李永梅. 胃癌手术、介入化疗后存活19年一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 828-829.
[5] 薛志有 倪志海 张毅. 胃癌组织中维甲酸相关孤儿受体α、微管相关蛋白轻链3的表达与病人远期预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 839-843.
[6] 彭启旺 邓浩 李威. 基于LncRNA表达的胃癌病人术后早期复发风险预测模型构建分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 848-851.
[7] 宋永树. 老年胃癌病人胃切除术后对早期口服营养的耐受性研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 852-855.
[8] 廖良功 胡俊杰 张弛 徐会 熊治国. HER2阳性胃癌及胆囊癌双原发一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 896-898.
[9] 龚佑红 吴艳烈. 食管空肠π形吻合术在完全3D腹腔镜下根治性全胃切除术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 649-652.
[10] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[11] 马翔宇 王文革 吴建临 刘琦. 双动全髋关节假体全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 662-665.
[12] 秦平 陈垦 陶齐林 周纳新. 三种体位对创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗效果的影响分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 666-669.
[13] 孙娇丽 张咸伟. 术后镇痛药物的逻辑选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 510-513.
[14] 陈超 张玮. 颈2背根神经节高电压长时程脉冲射频在颈源性头痛中的近期疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 521-523.
[15] 李宗富 陈铁良 丁梅 王增辉 陈建利. 快速康复外科对早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助保留幽门胃切除术患者营养状态的影响分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(5): 433-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[2] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[3] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[4] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[5] 李义亮;张成;克力木;等. 完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的临床体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 769 .
[6] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[7] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[8] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[9] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[10] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .