腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效及对肾功能的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.02.007

临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 121-124.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.02.007

腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效及对肾功能的影响

363000 福建漳州，中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第909医院泌尿外科（陈家财、李金雨、罗辉、林山），耳鼻喉颌面外科（曾宾华）

收稿日期:2021-06-07 接受日期:2021-06-07 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-02-20
通讯作者: 林山，Email:529458477@qq.com

Efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 stage renal cell carcinoma and its effect on renal function

Department of Urology ,909th PLA Joint Service Support Force,Fujian,Zhangzhou 363000, China

Received:2021-06-07 Accepted:2021-06-07 Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术（LPN）治疗cT1期肾癌（RCC）的疗效及对病人肾功能的影响。方法 2014年1月~2019年1月收治的cT1期RCC病人108例，根据手术方法将其分为LPN组与腹腔镜根治性肾切除术（LRN）组，比较两组围术期相关指标、病人术后肾功能，并发症发生情况，随访2~24个月，统计两组病死率。结果 LPN组手术时间（120.65±20.36）分钟、术中出血量（124.65±19.47）ml,术后进食时间(1.59±0.36)天，LRN组分别为（86.63±17.85）分钟、（113.64±17.74）ml、（1.18±0.32）天，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；LPN组引流管拔除时间（4.26±1.14）天、术后住院时间（8.71±2.27）天，LRN组分别为（4.03±1.02）天、（8.16±2.15）天，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两组术后并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后，两组血肌酐（SCr）均较术前显著上升（P<0.05），肾小球滤过率（eGRF）水平较术前显著下降（P<0.05），而LPN组术后SCr低于LRN组（P<0.05），eGFR水平显著高于LRN组（P<0.05）。随访2~24个月，平均随访时间（15.41±3.36）个月，LPN组随访期间内有2例病人死亡，LRN组无死亡病例，两组病死率比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 LPN与LRN手术在治疗cT1肾癌中的安全性相当，而采用LPN能有效保留具有功能的肾单位，降低术后慢性肾病及心血管疾病发生风险。但LPN依旧存在肿瘤切除不全风险，临床上应仔细评估肾癌病人机体条件与肿瘤状态，选择合适的术式。

关键词: 腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术, 腹腔镜根治性肾切除术, cT1期肾癌, 疗效, 肾功能

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal artery occlusion (LPN) in the treatment of cT1 stage renal carcinoma (RCC) and its effect on renal function. Methods 108 cT1 RCC patients admitted from January 2014 to January 2019 were divided into LPN group and LAPAROSCOPIC radical nephrectomy (LRN) group according to surgical methods.Perioperative related indicators,postoperative renal function and complications of the two groups were compared,and the mortality of the two groups was analyzed during 2-24 months follow-up. Results In LPN group,the operative time was (120.65±20.36) minutes,the intraoperative blood loss was (124.65±19.47) ml,and the postoperative feeding time was (1.59±0.36) days.LRN group were (86.63±17.85) min,(113.64±17.74) ml and (1.18±0.32) days,respectively,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).LPN group drainage tube removal time (4.26±1.14) days,postoperative hospital stay (8.71±2.27) days,LRN group (4.03±1.02) days,(8.16±2.15) days,there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05).After surgery,serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate (eGRF) levels in both groups were significantly higher than those before surgery (P<0.05),while SCr and eGFR levels in LPN group were significantly lower than those in LRN group (P<0.05).The mean follow-up time was (15.41±3.36) months.During the follow-up period,2 patients died in the LPN group and no death in the LRN group.There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion LPN is as safe as LRN in the treatment of cT1 renal cancer,and LPN can effectively preserve functional nephron and reduce the risk of postoperative chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease.However,LPN still has the risk of incomplete tumor resection,so it is recommended to carefully evaluate the body conditions and tumor status of patients with renal cancer and select an appropriate surgical method.

Key words: laparoscopic renal artery blocking partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, stage cT1 renal cancer;efficacy;renal function

陈家财曾宾华李金雨罗辉林山. 腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效及对肾功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 121-124.

CHEN Jiacai, ZENG Binghua, LI Jinyu, et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 stage renal cell carcinoma and its effect on renal function[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(2): 121-124.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	廖黄峻清张秋红郭震浪向松涛. 影像学与人工智能在预测体外冲击波碎石疗效中的运用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 105-108.
[2]	佘明杰徐永建张佩君付强卢伟刘小虎. 早期和延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石性胰腺炎疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 186-188.
[3]	芦斌梁立卓. 人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的手术学指标及骨密度、髋关节功能变化观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 193-195.
[4]	李小川黄春明罗绍坚范武董智晖蓝根卢明南林强祯陆军海韦健黎欲强黄冀. 颈前路Hybrid术式治疗跳跃节段颈椎病的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 65-69.
[5]	曾佩刘莹. 不同肾盂漏斗部夹角肾下盏结石病人采用不同术式的疗效及疗效相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 78-81.
[6]	辛国军王建承翁原驰张俊. 全胰腺切除术9例临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 619-621.
[7]	顾越雷郭德凯李镇伽江雨波刘蕾. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石+腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影/内镜下括约肌切开取石+腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗结石性急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(7): 622-625.
[8]	李鑫, 顾绍栋, 罗洪等. 治疗性血管新生在尿道下裂手术中的应用分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 514-516.
[9]	李干斌韩加刚王振军魏广辉渠浩翟志伟易秉强马华崇杨勇王建良李竹林. 新辅助放化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌的远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 422-427.
[10]	王全晖, 拜云虎, 袁守信. 双镜联合治疗胆总管结石术中不同一期缝合方式对病人的疗效及预后的影响评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 181-183.
[11]	聂金琳, 张浩然, 陈长顺. Castleman病三例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 199-200.
[12]	黄伟李荣伟郭凤傅楚华冯波孙立鹏柳亚岐徐东宝. 精准定位下神经内镜治疗脑室出血的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(10): 930-932.
[13]	夏漫辉冷云华季灿平丁学武陈佳杰. 胸腔镜食管癌切除联合左侧颈部吻合治疗食管癌的疗效及其对呼吸功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 760-763.
[14]	杨义超常媛媛陈玉杰杨亮韩静熊英. 聚桂醇硬化与外科手术治疗痔病的短期疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 778-780.
[15]	李潞赵欣吴丽王仿张少波杨晓红. 术前应用硫酸镁联合腰方肌局部阻滞对行全麻疝手术病人的疗效及对术后认知功能的影响分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 687-689.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

腹腔镜下肾动脉阻断肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效及对肾功能的影响

Efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the treatment of cT1 stage renal cell carcinoma and its effect on renal function

PDF (PC)

PDF (Mobile)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10