临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 71-73.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.01.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

SuperPath入路和Watson-Jones入路全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的临床对比分析

  

  1. 266100 山东省青岛市第八人民医院骨一科
  • 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-01-20

Clinical comparative study of SuperPath approach and Watson-Jones approach total hip replacement for traumatic femoral neck fractures

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Eighth People’s Hospital of Qingdao,Shandong,Qingdao 266100, China
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-01-20

PDF (PC)

333

PDF (Mobile)

15

摘要： 目的  对比SuperPath入路和Watson-Jones入路全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折的临床效果。
方法  创伤性股骨颈骨折病人120例，均行全髋关节置换术，根据治疗方法不同分为两组，观察组77例，采取SuperPath入路全髋关节置换术治疗；对照组43例，采取Watson-Jones入路全髋关节置换术治疗。比较两组临床疗效、围手术期指标、Harris评分及并发症发生率。
结果   观察组术后住院时间短于对照组，术后7天、1个月、12个月Harris评分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组病人切口延迟愈合率低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。
结论  SuperPath入路治疗创伤性股骨颈骨折创伤更小，术后髋关节功能恢复更好，且延迟愈合发生率低。

关键词: 全髋关节置换术, SuperPath入路, Watson-Jones入路, 创伤性股骨颈骨折, 切口延迟愈合

Abstract: Objective  To compare the clinical effect of superpath approach and Watson Jones approach in the treatment of traumatic femoral neck fracture.
Methods  120 cases of traumatic femoral neck fracture treated by total hip arthroplasty in our hospital were retrospectively selected.77 cases in the observation group were treated by total hip arthroplasty via superpath approach,and 43 cases in the control group were treated by total hip arthroplasty via Watson Jones approach.The curative effect,perioperative indexes,Harris score and incidence of complications of the two groups were compared.
Result  The postoperative hospitalization time of observation group was significantly lower than control group(P＜0.05).The Harris score of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group at 7 d,1 month and 12 months after operation(P＜0.05).The delayed wound healing rate in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(P＜0.05).
Conclusion  Superpath approach in the treatment of traumatic femoral neck fracture has certain clinical advantages,such as less trauma,better postoperative hip function recovery,and low incidence of delayed healing.

Key words: total hip replacement, SuperPath approach, Watson-Jones approach, traumatic femoral neck fracture, delayed healing of incision

[1] 汤月平 顾梅. 直接前入路与微创SuperPath入路对创伤性股骨颈骨折病人行全髋关节置换术的疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(3): 272-275.
[2] 隋峰 李敏哲 沈荐. 低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后会阴切口愈合延迟危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 431-434.
[3] 蒋仁义, 潘宏, 郑毅. 全髋关节置换术中氨甲环酸不同给药途径对手术效果的影响及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(4): 318-321.
[4] 罗加龙. SuperPath微创入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的近远期效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 300-303.
[5] 徐佳明, 李星亮, 王韬. 髋臼高位放置对股骨假体应力影响的有限元分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 239-242.
[6] 李雅欣〓王凌〓冯德宏等. 加速康复外科理念在人工全髋关节置换围手术期的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 955-958.
[7] 刘二涛 徐皓 陈建梅等. 金属对金属大直径股骨头全髋关节置换术的临床应用及近期疗效观察 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 294-296.
[8] 刘涛 徐皓 陈建梅. 全髋关节置换术治疗强直性脊柱炎髋关节强直 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(3): 221-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宫念樵. 器官捐献供肾质量评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 729 .
[2] 黄洪锋. 关注公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植受体围手术期感染的预防与处理[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 732 .
[3] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[4] 林俊. 原发性中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤供者在器官移植中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[5] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[6] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[7] 杨华;李新长;龙成美;等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾移植临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 747 .
[8] 石宇;刘学刚 . 冠状动脉旁路移植术后短期内应用强化他汀对患者出血风险的研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 750 .
[9] 陈忠;王耀东;田毅峰;等. 肝胆管结石病规范化治疗的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 753 .
[10] 齐卫鹏;王剑明;刘颜;等. 术前应用靛氰绿检测联合三维重建成像评估肝门部胆管癌肝脏储备功能[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 756 .
版权所有 © 《临床外科杂志》编辑部
地址：武汉市武昌区东湖路165号　邮编：430071　电话：027-87893476　E-mail: whlcwk@126.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
鄂ICP备11011458号-3