临床外科杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 437-439.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2021.05.012

• • 上一篇    下一篇

传统手术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗低位直肠较大腺瘤效价比及价值探讨

  

  1. 430010 武汉市第八医院肛肠外科(李志强、张宇星、陈继贵);武汉大学人民医院(周炎)
  • 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 周炎,Email:yanzhou0827@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2042018kf0123)

Analysis of the efficacy and cost ratio of traditional surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of low rectal adenoma

  1. Department of Anorectal Surgery,the Eighth Hospital of Wuhan,Wuhan 430060,China
  • Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-20

摘要: 目的  探讨传统经肛门局部切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)治疗低位直肠腺瘤效价比。
方法  2012年11月~2019年11月期间我院收治的低位直肠较大腺瘤病人96例,按两种手术方法将其分为两组,观察组48例,采用传统经肛门局部切除术;对照组48例,采用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)。比较两组的手术疗效、肛门疼痛情况、住院费用和耗材比。
结果  两组肿瘤完全切除率、完整切除率、术后并发症发生率、局部复发率比较,差异无统计学差异(P>0.05)。经肛门局部切除组术后第2小时、8小时、12小时肛门疼痛VAS评分均高于ESD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经肛门局部切除组住院费用和耗材比少于ESD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论  在确定低位直肠腺瘤治疗方案时,应根据病人病情、医院医疗技术水平及经济情况等选择最佳术式。

关键词: 直肠较大腺瘤, 传统手术; 内镜黏膜下剥离术, 术式

Abstract: Objective To explore the titer ratio of local resection through anus and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for the treatment of large adenoma of lower rectum,so as to provide a reference for the rational choice of operation.
Methods From November 2012 to November 2019,96 patients with large low rectal adenoma were divided into two groups according to two surgical methods,48 cases in the observation group were treated with traditional transanal local resection,and 48 cases in the control group were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).The operation efficacy,anal pain,hospitalization expenses and consumables ratio of the two groups were compared.
Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in complete resection rate,whole block resection rate,postoperative complication rate and local recurrence rate(P>0.05).The VAS scores of postoperative anal pain at 2h, 8h and 12h in the local anal resection group were higher than those in the ESD group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the cost of hospitalization and the ratio of consumables in the local anal resection group were significantly lower than that in the ESD group(P<0.05).
Conclusion In the treatment of low rectal adenoma,the best operation should be selected according to the patient's condition,the level of hospital medical technology and the patient's economic situation.

Key words: large rectal adenoma, traditional surgery, endoscopic submucosal dissection, operation method

[1] 朱杰 董志勇 王存川. 肥胖代谢外科新技术的发展与评价[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 801-803.
[2] 李四桥 买二辉 郑幼伟等. 腹腔镜改良Heller肌切开术联合胃底折叠术(Dor/Toupet)治疗贲门失弛缓症的临床疗效对比 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(3): 181-183.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 范强金;郑鹏超;李振军. 原发性肺软骨肉瘤病一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 320 .
[2] 辛兢;郝在军. 多模式镇痛用于膝关节镜下交叉韧带重建术临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 384 -0 .
[3] 石安辉;朱广迎. 局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗的现状与进展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 505 .
[4] 傅剑华;谭子辉. 食管癌的分期策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 521 .
[5] 冯雪园 杨克酩 闫朝岐. 隐匿性乳腺癌的诊断与治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 722 .
[6] 杨阳;金伟;查园瑜等. 脊柱内镜下脊神经背内侧支射频消融术治疗小关节源性腰痛疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(12): 931 .
[7] 代文杰;张爽. 从AJCC第8版乳腺癌预后分期解读看外科临床新进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(1): 19 .
[8] 王振军 付李缘. 大肠癌筛查共识与争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 721 -723 .
[9] 陈传贵 段晓峰 姜宏景. 达芬奇机器人手术系统辅助对比胸腹腔镜辅助食管癌根治术的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 715 -718 .
[10] 冯锦腾 范坤 张广健 付军科 高蕊. 食管异物202例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 683 -685 .