临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 938-942.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.10.013

• • 上一篇    下一篇

吉非替尼对比培美曲塞联合奈达铂新辅助治疗ⅢA-N2期表皮生长因子受体突变阳性肺腺癌病人的疗效

  

  1. 201900 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院胸外科(滕继平、杨志胤),肿瘤科 (胡晓华)
  • 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 胡晓华,Email:amsgood@163.com

The efficacy of gefitinib versus pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin in patients with stage ⅢA-N2 EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery,Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School,Shanghai 201900,China
  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-20

摘要: 目的 观察吉非替尼与培美曲塞联合奈达铂新辅助治疗ⅢA-N2期表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)突变阳性肺腺癌病人疗效与安全性。
方法  2015年1月~2019年5月初诊ⅢA-N2期EGFR突变肺腺癌病人89例,根据治疗用药的不同分为靶向治疗组(40例)与化疗组(49例),分别采用吉非替尼和培美曲塞联合奈达铂治疗;比较两组缓解率、组织学评级有效率、不良反应发生率、手术相关指标、术后并发症发生率以及随访生存率。
结果  吉非替尼组治疗缓解率和组织学评级有效率均高于化疗组(P<0.05);吉非替尼组皮疹、腹泻、甲沟炎和口腔黏膜炎发生率均高于化疗组(P<0.05),恶心、呕吐和骨髓抑制发生率均低于化疗组(P<0.05),Ⅲ~Ⅳ级不良反应发生率低于化疗组(P<0.05),转氨酶升高、周围神经炎发生率与化疗组无明显差异(P>0.05);两组手术切除率、手术时间、术中出血量及引流管留置时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);吉非替尼组中位生存时间显著长于化疗组(P<0.05)。
结论  与化疗比较,新辅助吉非替尼治疗对ⅢA-N2期EGFR突变肺腺癌疗效确切,不良反应轻,中位生存时间显著延长。

关键词: 肺癌, 腺癌, 表皮生长因子受体, 新辅助治疗, 化疗

Abstract: Objective To observe and compare the efficacy and safety of gefitinib and pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin neoadjuvant in patients with stage ⅢA-N2 EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma.
Methods Eighty-nine patients with stage ⅢA-N2 EGFR mutation lung adenocarcinoma who were newly diagnosed in our hospital from January 2015 to May 2019 were randomly divided into a targeted therapy group(40 cases)with Gefitinib and a chemotherapy group(49 cases)with pemetrexed combined with nedaplatin.Some items were compared by the two groups,including the remission rate,effective rate of histological grade,adverse reactions incidence,the levels of surgical-related clinical indicators,postoperative complications rate,and follow-up survival rate.
Results The remission rate and effective rate of histological grade of the were higher in the gefitinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05).The incidence of rash,diarrhea,paronychia,and oral mucositis were higher in the gefitinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05).The incidence of nausea,vomiting,and myelosuppression were lower in the gefitinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05),and the incidence of grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ adverse reactions were lower in the gefitinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the incidence of transaminase increased and peripheral neuritis between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in surgical resection rate,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and drainage tube indwelling time between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups(P>0.05).The median OS was significantly longer in the gefitinib group than in the chemotherapy group(P<0.05).
Conclusion Compared with chemotherapy,gefitinib for neoadjuvant therapy in treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutant at stage ⅢA-N2 stage was effective exactly,reduced the incidence of adverse reactions and significantly prolonged median survival time.

Key words: lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, epidermal growth factor receptor, neoadjuvant therapy, chemotherapy

[1] 黎增亮 潘宴青 马国栋. 实性影/占位总径比率在肺多发性磨玻璃样结节术后的预后价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 841-844.
[2] 高丹 郑媛 姜冉 陈波 田少林 王蓉 卢文亮. 乳房活检方式对前哨淋巴结活检的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 848-851.
[3] 陈革 陈汉雄 侯本新. NOBp1表达水平与乳腺癌临床病理因素及预后相关性[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 857-859.
[4] 王波 董小林. 人G补缀FHA域血管生成因子1在三阴性乳腺癌的表达与预后的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 860-863.
[5] 于德志 王凌鹤 马俊杰 王志远 高蔷 杨振坤 王全志. 肺肝样腺癌侵及脾脏一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 739-740.
[6] 任宇 王刚乐. 麦默通旋切术用于乳腺癌病灶切除的临床价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 764-766.
[7] 郑丽华 吴尚 张晶 张泽鹏 王昕仪 杨天硕 赵亚恒 贺新奇 刘运江. 纤维蛋白原与三阴性乳腺癌总生存期的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 767-770.
[8] 李一鸣 邱红. 晚期胆道系统恶性肿瘤的化疗及靶向治疗药物进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 793-797.
[9] 袁野 金润森 李鹤成. 机器人手术在肺癌外科的现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 601-604.
[10] 李宗元 陈晓烨 刘伦旭. 机器学习在肺癌外科的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 605-607.
[11] 滕啸 胡坚. 非小细胞肺癌新辅助免疫治疗前景[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 608-610.
[12] 张帆 谭锋维 薛奇 高树庚. 免疫检查点抑制剂在非小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗中的现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 611-614.
[13] 傅睿 钟文昭. 外科在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌多学科综合治疗中的地位[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 615-617.
[14] 郭凡 孙大强. 肺癌合并冠心病行同期外科手术治疗的现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 618-621.
[15] 朱余明 郑卉. 微创肺癌根治术进展与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 621-623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 江帆;孙权;吴国俊;等. 不同引流方式对恶性梗阻性黄疸患者细胞免疫的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 760 .
[2] 蔡逊 马丹丹 刘勇等. 腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗2型糖尿病及其并发症的临床疗效观察 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 276 - 276 .
[3] 李乾锋 杨国平 罗明等. 神经导航联合神经内镜治疗高血压脑出血50例临床分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 284 - 284 .
[4] 王友伢 徐明 王现国等 . 原发性肺纤维肉瘤一例 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 262 .
[5] 李裕标;郭乃铭;罗筱玮等. 一期关节置换治疗膝关节严重创伤[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 327 -0 .
[6] 钱文良;郑敏. EML4-ALK融合基因阳性非小细胞肺癌的诊疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 518 .
[7] 李小飞;赵晋波. 颈段食管癌外科治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 524 .
[8] 张临友;徐昊. 管状胃在食管癌手术应用的临床研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 552 .
[9] 谭黎杰;沈亚新. 微创食管切除术——复旦大学附属中山医院技术与经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 557 .
[10] 成德亮;张丽君;邱武安等. 改良指尖舌形皮瓣重建侧甲襞联合矩形皮瓣重建指蹼治疗先天性并指畸形[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 618 .