临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8): 732-735.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.08.011

• • 上一篇    下一篇

术中美蓝试验预防肝胆管结石切肝术后胆漏的效果分析

  

  1. 650101 昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科三病区
  • 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 滕毅山,Email:teng_yishan@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    昆明医科大学研究生创新基金资助项目(2019S175)

Comparative clinical analysis of intraoperative methylene blue test in reducing the incidence of bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis

  1. Department of the Third Ward of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic,the second affiliated hospital of Kunming Medical University,Yunnan,Kunming 650101,China
  • Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-08-20

摘要: 目的  分析术中美蓝试验预防肝胆管结石术切肝后胆漏的效果。
方法  2018年9月~2019年6月收治的肝切除术病人58例,根据术中是否行美蓝试验分为两组,美蓝组30例,肝切除术中行美蓝试验验证胆道系统通畅性及是否存在细小胆管残端,并对胆漏点进行封闭处理;对照组28例,肝切除术中行传统白纱布覆盖或胆道注水试验等方式寻找胆漏点。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术中胆漏检出率、术后3天胆漏情况、引流液总胆红素、腹腔引流管拔除时间、总住院时间。
结果  手术成功58例。美蓝组发生术后胆漏1例,出血1例,感染3例;对照组发生术后胆漏7例,出血1例,感染4例,经积极对症处理后均治愈。美蓝组术中胆漏检出率高于对照组,术后胆漏发生率、引流液总胆红素、腹腔引流管拔除时间、住院时间等均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后出血、感染等比较,异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论  肝胆管结石病人在肝切除术中行美蓝试验提高了术中胆漏检出率,经过精确缝扎,可降低术后胆漏发生率。

关键词: 肝切除术, 肝胆管结石, 美蓝试验, 胆漏

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical value of intraoperative methylene blue test in reducing the incidence of bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.
Methods The clinical data of 58 patients after hepatectomy,from September 2018 to June 2019 in the second affiliated hospital of Kunming medical university was retrospectively analyzed.According to the therapy method,58 patients were divided into the methylene blue group(n=30)and comparative group(n=28).The conditions for the methylene blue group are treated by using methylene blue text to verify whether biliary system is patency and whther the bile duct residual exist; The conditions for comparative group are treated by traditional white gauze cover or biliary injection test to find the bile leakage.The observational index are general information,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative bile leakage decetion rate,postoperative bile leakage,total bilirubin of drainage,abdominal drainage tube removal time and total hospitalization days.
Results 58 patients were succeed in hepatectomy.There are 1 cases of bile leakage occurred,1 case of postoperative bleeding occurred and 3 case of infection in methylene blue group.Besides,There are 7 cases of bile leakage occurred,1 case of postoperative bleeding occurred and 4 case of infection in comparative group.They were cured after active symptomatic treatment.Intraoperative bile leakage decetion rate in the methylene blue group were high than comparative group.Postoperative bile leakage,total bilirubin of drainage,abdominal drainage tube removal time and total hospitalization days in the methylene blue group were all less than comparative group with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).No statistically significance was observed in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative bleeding and infection between the two groups(P>0.05).
Conclusion Intraoperative methylene blue test can effectively improve intraoperative bile leakage decetion rate and reduce the incidence of bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.

Key words: hepatectomy, hepatolithiasis, Methylene blue test, bile leakage

[1] 王文强, 张二雷, 项帅, 董汉华, 龙新, 古今, 李剑, 黄志勇. 动脉优先持续阻断技术:巨大肝血管瘤切除的新策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 16-18.
[2] 陈志宇, 别平. 肝胆管结石病胆肠吻合术应用专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 23-26.
[3] 张海峰, 宋栋达, 刘荣. 达芬奇机器人右半肝切除技巧与经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 634-637.
[4] 轩志强, 史炼钢, 赵国华, 孙琳. 腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝癌病人的效果及对应激反应、T淋巴细胞的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 898-900.
[5] 马先仕 陈洪刚 吴念寿 柯松 肖绪鹏. 三维可视化技术指导下腹腔镜联合胆道硬镜治疗肝胆管结石的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 699-701.
[6] 邓正栋, 杨涛, 王剑明. 3D成像系统在复杂肝胆管结石病诊治中的应用(附40例报告)[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 929-931.
[7] 刘家盛 黄汉涛 罗勋鹏 荣愈平 许汉斌 愈波. 腹腔镜穿刺置管联合鼻胆管引流治疗胆漏12例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(3): 216-216.
[8] 彭家群. 输尿管镜气压弹道碎石治疗肝胆管结石35例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 903-904.
[9] 蔡烈 李志伟 王元喜 郑宇 陈进. 肝癌破裂出血的肝动脉化疗栓塞书及手术治疗(附16例报告)[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(12): 860-860.
[10] 张克明 董家鸿 蔡守旺 洪智贤 李高桦 段伟东 黄志强. 非转流冷灌注下离体肝切除术的临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(10): 669-669.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!