临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 1029-1032.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.12.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

神经内镜微创手术治疗高血压脑出血病人的手术效果及对病人神经功能的影响

  

  1. 629000 四川省遂宁市中心医院神经外科
  • 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-20

Minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery for patients with HICH and its effect on neurological function

  1. Department of Neurosurgery,Suining City Central Hospital,Sichuan Province,Suining  629000,China
  • Online:2019-12-20 Published:2019-12-20

摘要: 目的 探讨神经内镜微创手术治疗高血压脑出血(HICH)病人的手术效果及对病人神经功能的影响。方法 2015年1月~2018年2月在我院手术治疗的HICH病人110例,根据手术方法分为微创组48例(神经内镜手术治疗)、开颅组62例(小骨窗开颅手术治疗);对比两组的手术时间、手术出血量、血肿清除率、ICU时间、住院总时间、手术前后不同时间病人的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(NIHSS)、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)、日常生活活动能力(ADL)量表评分。结果 微创组和开颅组的手术时间分别为(140.6±22.1)分钟和(179.4±29.5)分钟,手术出血量分别为(37.2±8.6)ml和(187.5±32.0)ml,ICU时间分别为(4.2±1.0)天和(5.9±1.5)天,住院总时间分别为(15.8±2.0)天和(19.4±2.8)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);微创组的血肿清除率为(90.6±6.2)%,开颅组为(86.1±5.8)%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在手术前,两组NIHSS评分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);微创组病人术后4周及术后3个月的NIHSS评分分别为13.9±3.7和6.8±1.8,开颅组对应时间点分别为15.5±4.1和8.2±2.1,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3个月,微创组的MMSE评分(24.8±2.8)高于开颅组(22.5±3.6)(P<0.05);术后4周及术后3个月,微创组的ADL评分(49.8±6.2,71.3±5.8)均高于开颅组(46.3±5.7,67.5±6.2)(P<0.05)。结论 神经内镜微创手术治疗HICH较小骨窗开颅手术具有更好的临床效果,尤其是血肿清除及术后病人神经功能、认知功能、日常生活活动能力的恢复方面具有一定的优势。

关键词: 神经内镜, 微创手术, 高血压脑出血, 神经功能

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery on patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage(HICH)and its effect on nerve function.Methods Retrospective study of 110 patients with HICH in our hospital(January 2015 to February 2018)was conducted.According to the surgical method,48 patients in the minimally invasive group(neuroendoscopic surgery)and 62 patients in the craniotomy group(small bone window)were divided into craniotomy.Treatment);Comparison between the two groups of operation time,surgical bleeding volume,hematoma clearance rate,ICU days,total hospital time,patients with different times before and after the operation National Institutes of Health stroke scale score(NIHSS),simple mental state scale(MMSE),Daily Living Activity Ability(ADL)Scale score.Results Surgery time of invasive group and craniotomy group was(140.6±22.1)min and (179.4±29.5)min,while surgical hemorrhage was(37.2±8.6)ml and( 187.5±32.0)ml,ICU time was(4.2±1.0)d and (5.9±1.5)d,total hospitalization time was(15.8±2.0)d and (19.4±2.8)d,respectively.For comparison,the minimally invasive group was lower than the craniotomy group(P<0.05);The hematoma clearance rate in the minimally invasive group[(90.6±6.2)%] was higher than that in the craniotomy group[(86.1±5.8)%](P<0.05);Before the operation,there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of NIHSS scores(P>0.05),4 weeks after surgery and 3 months after surgery,the NIHSS score was gradually reduced in both groups(P<0.05).The NIHSS score(13.9±3.7,6.8±1.8)of the minimally invasive group was lower than that of the craniotomy group at the corresponding time(15.5±4.1,8.2±2.1)(P<0.05);In the 3 months after surgery,the MMSE score(24.8±2.8)in the minimally invasive group was higher than that in the craniotomy group(22.5±3.6)(P<0.05);After 4 weeks and 3 months after surgery,the ADL score(49.8±6.2,71.3±5.8)in the minimally invasive group was higher than that in the craniotomy group(46.3±5.7,67.5±6.2)(P<0.05).Conclusion Neural endoscopic minimally invasive surgery to treat HICH smaller bone window craniotomy has better results,especially hematoma removal and the recovery of nerve function,cognitive function,and daily life activity in patients after surgery have certain advantages.

Key words: nerve endoscopy, minimally invasive surgery, hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage, nerve function

[1] 周晓飞, 彭金燕, 刘燕. 微创手术在脑出血治疗中的安全性及对病人血清Cys-C、AQP4的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 671-673.
[2] 陈迎春, 尧小龙, 别毕洲, 汪志忠, 冯娟娟, 张纯, 李欢欢, 盛柳青, 李俊. 定位导向双靶点双通道锥颅治疗高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 674-676.
[3] 高榕, 蒋生智, 何长春, 胡晓帆, 明智绪, 孙涛, 张庆华. 神经内镜经鼻蝶窦垂体瘤切除术后颅底重建对病人生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 132-134.
[4] 胡月龙, 杨国瑛. 早期颅骨缺损修补术对病人神经功能修复的改善作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 48-50.
[5] 李峰 庞争取 范达文 张修春. 伤椎后1/3切除重建治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的疗效及对脊髓神经功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 705-708.
[6] 赵悦 任海军. 不同时机微创颅内血肿穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、脑源性神经营养因子和同型半胱氨酸水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 689-692.
[7] 孙树凯, 张百平, 贾栋. 小骨窗开颅内镜辅助血肿清除治疗高血压脑出血效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 970-972.
[8] 韩衍龙 张诚 陈冬明 潘淼 吴永刚. 内镜手术治疗泌乳素腺瘤52例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 831-834.
[9] 杜晓辉 何长征. 右半结肠癌微创治疗的术式选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 724-726.
[10] 詹惟 李建波 夏强等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术治疗胸部疾病78例体会 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 385-386.
[11] 魏林节 冯国君 董红让等. 高原地区高血压脑出血破入脑室35例手术治疗体会 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 314-315.
[12] 林松斌;王烈. 下肢静脉曲张微创手术的进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 895-897.
[13] 丁涵之 王从俊 梁春立等 . Mammotome联合开放手术治疗多发性乳腺肿块的研究 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(11): 809-810.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!