临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 592-594.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.07.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜与开腹脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效分析

  

  1. 新乡医学院研究生处
  • 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-20

Clinical analysis of laparoscopy and open surgery on portal hypertension in pericardial devascularization and splenectomy

  • Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-20

摘要: 目的:分析腹腔镜贲门周围血管离断术联合脾脏切除术治疗门静脉高压症的临床疗效。方法:门静脉高压症病人48例,根据手术方式分为开腹组(开腹贲门周围血管离断术)和腔镜组(腹腔镜贲门周围血管离断术),每组24例,观察比较两组的临床疗效。结果:腹腔镜组术后丙氨酸氨基转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、总胆红素(total bilirubin,TBIL)下降幅度分别为45.00、35.59和25.79,开腹组分别为49.34、43.17和27.88,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);腔镜组术后并发症总发生率为16.67%(4例),开腹组为58.33%(16例);腔镜组术后随访1年并发症总发生率为4.17%(1例),开腹组为29.17%(7例),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症,术后ALT、AST、TBIL恢复更快,术后并发症降低。  

关键词: 腹腔镜手术, 门脉高压症, 脾脏切除, 贲门周围血管离断

Abstract: Objective:To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic highly selective pericardial devascularization combined with splenectomy in the treatment of portal hypertension.Methods:48 patients with portal hypertension were divided into the laparotomy group (open pericardial devascularization) and the endoscopic group (Laparoscopic pericardia devascularization) according to the surgical methods. Each group had 24 patients, and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed and compared.Results:After surgery, the decrease of alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST)and total bilirubin(TBIL)in the laparoscopic group(△〖AKX-〗=45.00、△〖AKX-〗=35.59、△〖AKX-〗=25.79) was significantly greater than that of open surgery group(△〖AKX-〗=49.34、△〖AKX-〗=43.17、△〖AKX-〗=27.88). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The overall complication rate in the laparoscopic surgery group (16.67%) was significantly lower than that of the open surgery group (58.33% ). The patients were followed up for 1 year, the overall incidence of complication of laparoscopic surgery group (4.17%) was lower than that of open surgery group (29.17%), the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Portal hypertension treated by laparoscopic pericardial devascularization with ALT, AST, TBIL recover faster,less postoperative complications, and better quality a life than pericardial devascularization.  

Key words: laparoscopy, portal hypertension, splenectomy, pericardial devascularization

[1] 李欣龙, 顾立虎, 祝和攀, 潘军海, 陈玉萍. 加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 404-407.
[2] 巴雅尔, 李钢, 高洪强, 卢晖, 张荣. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 155-157.
[3] 周东, 李恒平, 黄卫东, 丁正华. 腹腔镜辅助下急诊手术治疗小儿腹股沟嵌顿疝经验总结[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 70-71.
[4] 高佳, 李立晶, 刘国亮, 滑蕾, 王小雪, 张建敏. 儿童腹腔镜手术对局部脑氧饱和度的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 85-87.
[5] 杨海宁 冶秀花 . 腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效及对血清细胞间黏附分子1、人基质金属蛋白酶9和血管内皮生长因子的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 780-782.
[6] 林建江 刘凡隆. 慢传输型便秘的腹腔镜治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 244-245.
[7] 郭震 陈辉 刘韦成等. 腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗慢传输型便秘临床效果的Meta分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 250-254.
[8] 陈晓明 肖旺青 胡俊丹 胡云飞. 后腹腔镜治疗复杂性输尿管中上段结石的170例体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(6): 420-420.
[9] 朱天琦 魏明发 冯杰雄 孙晓毅 翁一珍 张文 易斌 余东海 吴晓娟 张雪琴. 腹腔镜和开腹结肠切除手术治疗先天性巨结肠临床观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 102-102.
[10] 姜洪伟 王举 梁越 孙国鹏 . 腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(12): 858-858.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 冯勋强. 改良Devine治疗小儿隐匿性阴茎158例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 379 -0 .
[2] 董刚 晁威 张立明. 保留肋间臂神经在乳腺癌改良根治术中的临床意义[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 669 .
[3] 于海跃;刘正昊;崔君鹏等. APE1基因(Asp148Glu)多态性与结直肠癌易感性之间关系的Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(10): 761 -764 .
[4] 吴猛;刘良兵;易东风. 软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗直径≤2cm肾结石5年回顾性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(6): 469 .
[5] 田春雷;王雄伟;邓远国等. 三种入路显微手术治疗基底节脑出血197例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(9): 663 .
[6] 何咏竞;孙国平 . 乳腺癌术后复发时间与临床因素的相关性分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(1): 35 .
[7] 黄力;姚启盛;陈从波等. 输尿管支架管移位腹腔一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(2): 160 .
[8] 陆超敬 洪江 李鑫 杨立信. 经口置入钉砧头系统在颈段及胸上段食管癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 662 -664 .
[9] 杨溪, 周业庭, 杨茂辉等. 成人钝性脾损伤非手术治疗效果的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 940 -942 .
[10] 赵以林, 罗爱林. 2018版美国麻醉医师协会适度镇静和镇痛指南解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 24 -28 .