临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 461-465.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.05.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经盲肠末端回肠插管造口术在保护高危直肠吻合口中的应用

  

  1. 233000  安徽医科大学附属阜阳医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-09 修回日期:2022-07-09 出版日期:2023-05-20 发布日期:2023-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 夏国志,Email:59850180@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2020年安徽医科大学校基金支持项目( 2020xkj227)

Application of transcaecal terminal ileum tube ileostomy in protecting high risk rectal anastomosis

  1. Department of General Surgery,Fuyang Hospital,Anhui Medical University,Anhui,Fuyang 233000,China
  • Received:2022-07-09 Revised:2022-07-09 Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-05-20

摘要: 目的 探讨改良的新式气囊导管应用于经盲肠末端回肠插管造口术(transcecum tube ileostomy,TTI)时,对保护具有高危因素直肠吻合口使用效果。方法 2019年12月~2021年12月在我院完成结直肠恶性肿瘤手术切除后,因吻合口具有高危因素而行预防性造口的病人61例,根据造口方式的不同分为经盲肠末端回肠插管造口组(TTI组,29例)和传统末端回肠造口术组(loop ileostomy,LI组32例),比较两组病人性别、年龄、术前合并症、肿瘤距肛缘距离、手术时间、造口手术时间、术后吻合口相关并发症、术后造口/造口管引流量、造口/造口管相关并发症、住院费用等指标。结果 TTI组和LI组造口手术时间分别为(16.31±2.64)分钟、(27.84±4.85)分钟,手术费用分别为(4.84±0.50)万元、(5.85±1.19)万元(LI组包含二次手术费用)、造口/造口管相关并发症分别为34%、6%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);TTI组无再手术病例,LI组再手术18例,其中1例为造口重建,其余均为造口还纳术,再手术后并发症发生率为55.56%(10/18),以废用性肠炎最常见,并且出现1例ISREC B级漏,予以禁食水、营养支持等对症处理痊愈,两组再手术率、再手术并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组均有2例ISREC A级漏,LI组中有1例吻合口狭窄,持续扩张2周后好转,两组吻合口并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组手术时间、出血量、吻合口距肛缘距离、肿瘤直径、术后住院时间、造口/造口管每日引流量等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 新式改良气囊导管应用于TTI手术安全可靠,在保护具有高危因素的直肠吻合口方面与传统末端回肠造口有着相似的效果,但并发症更少,手术操作简单。

关键词: 末端回肠插管造口, 吻合口漏, 术后并发症

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of a new balloon catheter modified by the author in the protection of rectal anastomosis with high risk factors in Transcecum tube ileostomy(TTI).Method From December 2019 to December 2021, 61 patients underwent prophylactic ostomy due to high risk factors of anastomosis after surgical resection of colorectal malignant tumor in our hospital.According to the different way of colostomy into the cecum terminal ileum intubation colostomy groups(TTI,29 cases) and traditional end ileostomy group(Loop ileostomy,32 cases).The gender,age,preoperative comorbidities,distance between tumor and anal margin,operation time,stoma operation time,postoperative anastomose-related complications,postoperative stoma/stoma tube drainage volume,stoma/stoma tube related complications,hospitalization costs and other related indicators were compared and analyzed between the two groups.Results The operation time of TTI group and LI group were (16.31±2.64)min and (27.84±4.85)min,respectively,and the operation cost was (4.84±0.50)thousand yuan and (5.85±1.19)thousand yuan,respectively.In LI group,the incidences of ostomy/ostomy tube related complications were 34% and 6%,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).In the TTI group,there were no reoperation cases,while in the LI group,18 cases were reoperation,including 1 case of stoma reconstruction and the rest of them were ostomy reduction.The incidence of complications after reoperation was 55.56%(10/18),and disuse enteritis was the most common,and one case of ISREC grade B leakage was found,which was cured by symptomatic treatment such as fasting water and nutritional support.There were significant differences in reoperation rate and complication rate between the two groups(P < 0.05).There were 2 cases of ISREC grade A leakage in both groups,and 1 case of anastomotic stenosis in the LI group,which was improved after 2 weeks of continuous expansion.There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic complications between the two groups(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in operation time,blood loss,distance between anastomosis and anal margin,postoperative hospital stay,tumor size,and daily drainage volume of stoma/stoma tube(P>0.05).Conclusion This new modified balloon catheter is safe and reliable for TTI surgery.It has similar effect to traditional terminal ileostomy in protecting rectal anastomosis with high risk factors,but has fewer complications and the operation is simple.

Key words: transcecum tube ileostomy, anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications

[1] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[2] 赵硕 党诚学 李文星 刘嘉欣 杨刚华. 食管癌术后吻合口漏危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 161-164.
[3] 胡明玉 苗祥 潘书鸿. 改良结肠渗漏评分对左结肠直肠手术病人吻合口漏的预测价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(2): 175-178.
[4] 刘继辉, 孙明, 余兵. 纵隔负压引流管在经右胸途径食管癌手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 714-716.
[5] 孙启刚, 符策雄, 郑进方. 绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[6] 黄文博 陈小丽 许建华 黄志军. 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌术后吻合口漏危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1144-1146.
[7] 高云飞 展翼翼 何丹 阿迪力·萨来 孙伟 罗洞波. 食管癌根除术后合并吻合口漏的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(9): 864-866.
[8] 王功锦, 黄杰. 可降解材料聚乙醇酸垫片在全腔镜食管癌根治术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 548-550.
[9] 刘沂, 祁薇, 刘宝华. 保护性回肠造口术在低位直肠癌保肛手术中应注意的问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 186-189.
[10] 孙纪三, 谢炎, 罗宇涵, 蒋文涛. 肝移植肠道微生态研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1085-1088.
[11] 楼征, 张卫. 中国直肠癌手术吻合口漏诊断预防及处理专家共识2019版解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 41-42.
[12] 王世平. 食管癌根治食管胃颈部吻合术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 612-614.
[13] 吴分浪, 关则俭, 陈盛勇等. 脑室腹腔分流术后颅内感染20例诊治体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 615-617.
[14] 郝志楠, 莫波, 闵春明, 何磊. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉对肠系膜下动脉3型直肠癌病人临床疗效及术后并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 492-494.
[15] 张明府, 吴永丰, 柳东. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉对术后吻合口漏及近期疗效的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 400-403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 邱江. 心脏死亡捐献供肾移植免疫抑制方案的选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 735 .
[2] 林俊. 原发性中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤供者在器官移植中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 737 .
[3] 阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[4] 胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[5] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[6] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[7] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[8] 陈绍站;许勇;李婧;等. 防旋股骨近端髓内针与股骨近端解剖锁定钢板治疗转子间骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 787 .
[9] 戴强;徐康;周治军;等. 湖北天门地区泌尿系结石成分及特征分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 789 .
[10] 刘琼;江辉. 喉罩在小儿舌系带矫正手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 792 .