临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 535-538.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.06.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

甲磺酸罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因在疝囊高位结扎术超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞中的应用比较

  

  1. 431600 湖北省孝感汉川市人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-20 接受日期:2022-10-20 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 孙桂珍,Email:1594398947@qq.com

Comparison of the application of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block during high ligation of hernia sac

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,Hanchuan People's Hospital,Hubei,Xiaogan 431600
  • Received:2022-10-20 Accepted:2022-10-20 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-20

摘要: 目的 观察超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞下甲磺酸罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因在疝囊高位结扎术中的镇痛效果及安全性。方法 2018年3月~2020年3月我院收治的腹股沟疝患儿133例,按神经阻滞药物分为甲磺酸罗哌卡因组(RP组)与左旋布比卡因组(LB组),RP组62例,LB组71例。比较两组临床指标、镇痛效果[儿童疼痛行为量表(FLACC)]及安全性。结果 两组患儿拔管时间、苏醒时间及住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),LB组瑞芬太尼用量低于RP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿术后4小时(T1)FLACC评分高于术后即刻(T0)、术后12小时(T2)及术后24小时(T3)时点,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且LB组T1、T2 时点FLACC评分均低于RP组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超声引导下的甲磺酸罗哌卡因或左旋布比卡因用于腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿疝囊高位结扎术均有良好的镇痛效果,左旋布比卡因的镇痛强于甲磺酸罗哌卡因,两者安全性相当。

关键词: 疝囊高位结扎术, 腹横肌平面阻滞, 甲磺酸罗哌卡因, 左旋布比卡因, 镇痛效果

Abstract: Objective To observe the analgesic effect and safety of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in high ligation of hernia sac under ultrasonography guided transversus abdominis plane block.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 133 children with inguinal hernia admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020.Nerve block drugs were divided into two groups:ropivacaine group(RP group) and levobupivacaine group(LB group),with 62 cases in RP group and 71 cases in LB group.Clinical indexes,analgesic effect(FLACC) and safety were compared.Results There were no significant differences in extubation time,recovery time and hospitalization time between the two groups(P>0.05),and the dosage of remifentanil in LB group was significantly lower than that in RP group(P<0.05).The FLACC score at T1 was significantly higher than that at T0,T2 and T3(P<0.05).The FLACC scores of LB group at T1 and T2 were significantly lower than those of RP group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The ultrasonic guided ropivacaine or levobupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block had good analgesic effect in the high ligation of children's hernia sac.The analgesic effect of levobupivacaine was stronger than that of ropivacaine,both are equally safe.

Key words: high ligation of hernia sac, transversus abdominis plane block, Ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, analgesic effect

[1] 康文彬, 李颖源, 周雪, 杨小宇, 冯霞. 腹横肌平面阻滞和腰方肌阻滞的效果对比[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 456-459.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 喻少敏;郭卫春. 二十二碳六烯酸在急性脊髓损伤后早期炎性反应中的作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 301 .
[2] 周萍, 许楠, 陆澄. 腋窝淋巴结状态对乳腺癌保乳手术后复发病人的预后影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 769 -772 .
[3] 龙林生, 郑慧锋, 彭昊. 下尺桡关节不稳的诊断与治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(10): 919 -921 .
[4] 陈琳, 董汉华, 程琪, 龙新, 陈孝平. 胰十二指肠切除标准化流程——同济经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 5 -7 .
[5] 张涛, 孙备. 2019年NCCN胰腺癌临床实践指南(V2 版)更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 8 -11 .
[6] 唐健雄, 李航宇. 老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 12 -15 .
[7] 王文强, 张二雷, 项帅, 董汉华, 龙新, 古今, 李剑, 黄志勇. 动脉优先持续阻断技术:巨大肝血管瘤切除的新策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 16 -18 .
[8] 荚卫东, 刘文斌. 《肝血管瘤诊断和治疗多学科专家共识(2019 版)》解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 19 -22 .
[9] 陈志宇, 别平. 肝胆管结石病胆肠吻合术应用专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 23 -26 .
[10] 林锦娜, 刘强. 2019年NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南更新解读:乳腺癌局部治疗新进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 27 -30 .