临床外科杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 674-676.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.08.014

• • 上一篇    下一篇

定位导向双靶点双通道锥颅治疗高血压脑出血的疗效分析

  

  1. 430032 江汉大学附属湖北省第三人民医院神经外科
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-20

Analysis of clinical efficacy of location-oriented double-target and double-channel intracranial puncture in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

  1. Department of Neurosurgery,Hubei Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Jianghan University,Wuhan 430032,China
  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-20

摘要: 目的 观察应用握持式颅脑穿刺进行定位导向双靶点双通道锥颅治疗基底节区高血压脑出血临床疗效及安全性。方法 基底节区高血压脑出血病人58例,均利用握持式颅脑穿刺定位导向方法治疗,根据治疗方法不同分为实验组和对照组。实验组15例,行双靶点双通道锥颅微创穿刺置管引流,对照组43例,行单通道穿刺置管引流,比较两组治疗效果。结果 两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。51例患者均成功穿刺,引流管均置入理想靶点;两组均无穿刺过程中再出血,实验组术后平均置管时间(3.1±0.6)天,术后血肿清除率87.4%,NICU住院时间(3.8±0.8)天,平均住院时间(10.6±1.6)天;对照组术后平均置管时间(4.4±0.8)天,术后血肿清除率81.2%,NICU住院时间(5.5±1.3)天,平均住院时间(16.6±3.3)天;实验组平均置管,NICU住院,住院时间较对照组均显著缩短(P<0.05)。两组均无颅内感染病例发生。6个月随访,实验组预后良好率66.67%,对照组预后良好率72.09%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 定位导向双点双通道锥颅治疗基底节区高血压脑出血简单可行,穿刺成功率高,较单通道穿刺相比手术风险无明显增加,但血肿引流效率更高,能降低NICU及总住院时间。

关键词: 双靶点, 双通道, 锥颅, 高血压脑出血, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of location-guided double-point and double-channel intracranial puncture in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia.Methods 58 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia were treated by location-guided  intracranial puncture and orientation.15 cases in the experimental group were treated with double-target and double-channel minimally invasive puncture and catheter drainage,while 43 cases in the control group were treated with single-channel puncture and catheter drainage.The clinical data and therapeutic effects of the two groups were summarized and analyzed.Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups(P>0.05).51 patients were successfully punctured and the drainage tube was placed into the ideal target; there was no bleeding during puncture in both groups.The average indwelling time of the experimental group was(3.1±0.6)d,the clearance rate of hematoma after operation was 87.4%,the hospitalization time of NICU was(3.8±0.8)d,and the average hospitalization time was(10.6±1.6)d.The average indwelling time of the control group was(4.4±0.8)d,the clearance rate of hematoma after operation was 81.2%, the average hospitalization time of NICU was(5.5±1.3)d,and the average hospitalization time was(16.6±3.3)d.The average indwelling time,hospitalization time and NICU time of experimental group was significantly shorter than that of control group(P<0.05).No intracranial infection occurred in both groups.Six months follow-up showed that the good prognosis rate of the experimental group was 66.67%,while that of the control group was 72.09%.There was no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion Location-guided double-target and double-channel intracranial puncture is simple and feasible for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.The success rate of puncture is high.Compared with single-channel puncture,the risk of operation is not significantly increased,but the efficiency of hematoma drainage is higher,which can reduce NICU and total hospital stay,and is conducive to early rehabilitation of patients.

Key words: double target, double channel, intracranial puncture, hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, clinical efficacy

[1] 梁展维. 保守与手术治疗小儿膀胱输尿管反流疗效及适应证分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 801-804.
[2] 谢群, 张瑞瑞, 山超等. 人工真皮移植联合藻酸盐辅料治疗糖尿病足的疗效评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 813-815.
[3] 石乔, 刘垒, 张晓艺, 荣愈平, 熊星铖, 常剑, 王卫星, 陶京. 国内应用吉西他滨联合高强度聚焦超声治疗中晚期胰腺癌疗效的Meta分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 680-683.
[4] 吴开明, 姚龙, 康宁宁等. 进展期食管癌微创治疗术后远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 558-561.
[5] 张磊, 孙昱, 黄熠. 经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与切开挂线术治疗经括约肌肛瘘的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.
[6] 万婷, 周海孝, 朱占永, 余墨声. 蝎肽抗菌凝胶联合外科手术治疗下肢静脉性溃疡的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 512-513.
[7] 王誉都, 李鹏, 高亚, 黄强. 单孔腹腔镜下经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 517-519.
[8] 张明府, 吴永丰, 柳东. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉对术后吻合口漏及近期疗效的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 400-403.
[9] 唐云德, 徐卫国, 于风珍, 尚林强. 椎间孔镜微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 439-442.
[10] 方红, 赵子伟, 韩雪, 姚永强. 麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 205-208.
[11] 庞松强, 罗功唐, 宋瑶. 3D与2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌综合效果及并发症比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 109-112.
[12] 彭华荣, 孙魁, 冯子驹. 经腹侧与经背侧超声定位在输尿管上段结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 126-128.
[13] 赵悦 任海军. 不同时机微创颅内血肿穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶、脑源性神经营养因子和同型半胱氨酸水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(9): 689-692.
[14] 孙树凯, 张百平, 贾栋. 小骨窗开颅内镜辅助血肿清除治疗高血压脑出血效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 970-972.
[15] 韩衍龙 张诚 陈冬明 潘淼 吴永刚. 内镜手术治疗泌乳素腺瘤52例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 831-834.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[2] 张业强;晏大学;高小见 . 急诊肋骨内固定手术对严重连枷胸患者恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 794 .
[3] 朱旭阳;朱学锋. 乳腺癌改良根治术后负压引流管的改良应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 867 .
[4] 郑江;赵平;陈尔东等. 136例老年高能量股骨转子间骨折的临床治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 353 -0 .
[5] 周志强;李佐凡;陈躐等. 无痛胃镜患者疼痛敏感度相关因素调查[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 381 -0 .
[6] 金祺;阮文枫;赵欣宇等. Buck技术结合钉棒系统治疗青少年峡部裂性腰椎滑脱一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 347 -0 .
[7] 张卫;楼征 . 重视成人巨结肠的诊断及外科治疗 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(6): 425 .
[8] 钱文良;郑敏. EML4-ALK融合基因阳性非小细胞肺癌的诊疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 518 .
[9] 刘伟;潘铁军;杨家荣等. 经尿道前列腺电切术后导尿困难原因分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(8): 647 .
[10] 殷茜 张汝超 杨筱嵬等. 中电导钙激活钾离子通道在乳腺癌中的表达及其与临床病理指标的关系[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 666 .