临床外科杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 773-776.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10056483.2018.10.017

• • 上一篇    下一篇

控制性阶梯式减压与传统大骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的对比分析

  

  1. 635000  四川省达州市中心医院神经外科(王星),检验科(隗麟懿);四川省达州市南方医院外二科(陈奎屹)
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-28 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-20

Comparative study of controlled staircase decompression and decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

  1.   Department of Neurosurgery,Dazhou Central Hospital,Sichuan Province,Dazhou 635000,China
  • Received:2018-03-28 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-20

摘要:   目的  探讨控制性阶梯式减压术对重型颅脑损伤病人临床预后的影响。方法  重型脑损伤病人159例,按治疗方式分组。对照组接受传统大骨瓣减压手术(68例),观察组病人接受控制性阶梯式减压手术治疗(91例)。记录两组病人手术时间及术中出血情况;于治疗前,治疗3天,14天,30天给予格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评估病人神经功能;比较两组病人并发症情况;治疗90天和1年采用格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)评估病人恢复情况。结果  观察组和对照组病人开始颅内减压时间分别为(11.89±4.10)分钟和(34.47±10.03)分钟,手术时间分别为(1.47±0.43)小时和(1.81±0.51)小时,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组术中出血量分别为(103.1±29.8)ml和(121.0±33.3)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);14天后观察组恢复优于对照组(P<0.05);对照组和观察组并发症的发生率分别为20.59% 和 9.89%(P<0.05);90天和1年观察组病人GOS评分明显优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组和对照组死亡率分别为3.30% 和 5.88%(P<0.05)。结论  控制性阶梯式减压术治疗可缩短重型颅脑损伤病人的手术时间,减少出血量,改善病人的临床预后。

Abstract:    Objective    To investigate the effect of controlled step decompression on the clinical prognosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.Methods  159 patients of severe traumatic brain injury were divided into control group(68 cases)and observation group(91  cases)according to the treatment method.Patients in control group received decompressive craniectomy,while patients in observation group received controlled staircase decompression.The time of operation and volume of bleeding were recorded;GCS score was used to evaluate the recovery of neurological function at before treatment,day 3,day 14 and day 30;Complications after operation between the two groups were compared.GOS scores were used to assess patient recovery at 90day and 1year.Results The intracranial decompression time and operation time of the patients in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group[(11.89±4.10)min vs(34.47±10.03)min,(1.47±0.43)h vs(1.81±0.51)h,P<0.05,respectively).The volume of bleeding during the operation of the observation group was less than that of the control group[(103.1±29.8)ml vs(121.0±33.3)ml,P<0.05)].The observation group recovered significantly better than the control group at 14 days after treatment(P<0.05);The incidence of complications in the control group was higher than that in the observation group(20.59% vs 9.89%,P<0.05); The GOS score of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group at 90 days and 1 year followup(P<0.05);The mortality of the patients in the observation group(3.30%)was significantly lower than that in the control group(5.88%)(P<0.05).Conclusion Controlled step decompression can shorten the operation time and reduce the volume of bleeding of patients with severe traumatic brain injury,and improve the clinical prognosis of the patients.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张成 克力木 汪忠镐 . 胃食管反流病的外科治疗进展 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 254 .
[2] 宋辉琼 邹玉凤 张宗泽等. 肿瘤细胞减灭术联合腹腔内热灌注化疗术后谵妄发生的危险因素分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 308 - 308 .
[3] 寇晓梅 柯永莉 张晨芳等. 应用邻近扩张皮瓣修复T4期局部晚期乳腺癌术中大面积软组织缺损的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 675 .
[4] 王丽 刘运江 杨帆等. 过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ辅激活因子1α在乳腺癌患者中的表达及其与临床病理特征关系研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 680 .
[5] 娄宏斌 傅点 程文等. 经腹腹腔镜治疗输尿管下段结石35例临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 696 .
[6] 周治军 卢童 徐康等. 可视化穿刺系统在经皮肾镜碎石术中的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 700 .
[7] 刘磊 丁娟 刘经纬. 腰丛-坐骨神经联合臀上皮神经阻滞麻醉与腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉用于髋关节置换术的临床效果观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 706 .
[8] 周观金 彭昊 陈森. 865例锁骨中段骨折手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 714 .
[9] 杨贵森 周毅 袁双龙. 乳腺癌循环肿瘤细胞临床应用的相关研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 717 .
[10] 侯丁丁 康骅. 近红外荧光在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 719 .