临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1105-1108.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.10.029

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐酸度洛西汀联合标准镇痛对腰椎融合术病人疼痛控制效果和改善预后生活质量的临床分析

陈硕 薛力 银保 陈玲   

  1. 611830 四川省都江堰市人民医院骨科(陈硕、银保);成都市第三人民医院骨科(薛力); 四川省都江堰市人民医院健康管理中心(陈玲)
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-10 出版日期:2024-11-07 发布日期:2024-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 薛力,Email:baisexiaota@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省医学会项目(2019SAT10)

Optimized pain control with standard analgesia plus duloxetine hydrochloride for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery and its effect on prognostic quality of life

CHEN Shuo*,XUE Li,YIN Bao,CHEN Ling   

  1. *Department of Orthopaedics,People's Hospital of Dujiangyan,Dujiangyan,Sichuan 611830,China
  • Received:2023-11-10 Online:2024-11-07 Published:2024-11-07

摘要: 目的探讨盐酸度洛西汀联合标准镇痛对腰椎融合术病人疼痛控制及生活质量的改善效果。方法 前瞻性选择2019年5月~2020年12月在我院行腰椎融合术治疗的病人106例,按随机数字表法分为观察组(54例)与对照组(52例)。对照组术后给予标准镇痛,观察组给予标准镇痛联合盐酸度洛西汀镇痛。比较两组术后疼痛程度、镇痛药物使用情况(术后镇痛泵首次按压时间、术后48小时镇痛泵有效按压次数)、心理情绪、生活质量改善情况及不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组术后1天、术后3天和术后7天静息时视觉模拟评分法(VAS)分别为(4.19±0.78)分、(2.84±0.61)分和(1.73±0.42)分,对照组分别为(5.24±0.80)分、(3.51±0.57)分和(2.49±0.56)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后镇痛泵首次按压时间为(12.33±2.34)小时,术后48小时镇痛泵有效按压次数为(3.78±0.92)次,对照组分别为(7.61±0.85)小时,(10.44±3.27)次,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后7天、14天心理情绪焦虑自评量表(SAS)分别为(52.44±6.71)分、(37.85±6.49)分,抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分分别为(51.16±5.43)分、(35.64±5.36)分,对照组分别为(57.39±6.43)分、(42.66±5.25)分,(55.37±5.25)分、(40.18±5.22)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后4周生活质量量表(SF-36)评分为(83.44±6.72)分,对照组为(78.63±5.11)分,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后不良反应发生率(7.41%)比对照组(21.15%)低,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腰椎融合术病人术后应用标准镇痛联合盐酸度洛西汀镇痛能有效提升镇痛效果,减少阿片类药物使用,改善负面情绪及生活质量,降低术后不良反应发生率。

关键词: 盐酸度洛西汀; 腰椎融合术; 疼痛控制; 生活质量; 心理情绪

Abstract: Objective To discuss the optimized pain control with standard analgesia plus duloxetine hydrochloride for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery,and to analyze its effect on prognostic quality of life.Methods A prospective study was conducted on 106 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery in our hospital from May 2019 to December 2020.Patients were randomly assigned into two groups according to analgesic methods.Control group (n=52) was given standard analgesia,while observation group (n=54) received standard analgesia plus duloxetine hydrochloride.Then the degree of postoperative pain,the use of analgesics (the time of the first additional analgesic drugs,effective pressing times within 48 hours after operation),the improvement of psychological emotions,quality of life,and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results Observation group scored (4.19±0.78),(2.84±0.61) and (1.73±0.42) on visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative 1 d,3 d and 7 d,which were lower than (5.24±0.80),(3.51±0.57) and (2.49±0.56) in control group (P<0.05).Compared with control group,observation group had delayed time of the first additional analgesic drugs [(12.33±2.34)h vs (7.61±0.85)h] and less effective pressing times within 48 hours after operation [(3.78±0.92) vs (10.44±3.27)] than those of control group (P<0.05).Observation group scored lower on Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) at postoperative 7 d [(52.44±6.71) vs (57.39±6.43)] and 14 d [(37.85±6.49) vs (42.66±5.25)],lower on Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) at postoperative 7 d [(51.16±5.43) vs (55.37±5.25)] and 14 d [(35.64±5.36) vs (40.18±5.22)],and higher on 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at postoperative 4w [(83.44±6.72) vs (78.63±5.11)] than those of control group,with statistical difference (all P<0.05).The adverse reaction rate was 7.41% in observation group,which was lower than 21.15% in control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The optimized pain control with standard analgesia plus duloxetine hydrochloride for patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery can effectively can effectively improve the analgesic effect,reduce the use of opioids,alleviate negative emotions and improve quality of life with less adverse reactions,which is worth promoting.

Key words: duloxetine hydrochloride; lumbar fusion surgery; pain control; quality of life; psychological emotions

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!