临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 763-766.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.07.025

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

创面负压治疗联合骨膜牵张术治疗糖尿病足的临床研究

李静 周羿辰 衡德忠   

  1. 472000 河南省黄河三门峡医院骨科一区
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-05 出版日期:2024-07-20 发布日期:2024-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 衡德忠,Email:843150065@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    三门峡市科技发展计划项目(2022002052)

Clinical study on treatment of Diabetic foot with negative pressure of wound surface combined with periosteal distraction

LI Jing,ZHOU Yichen,HENG Dezhong   

  1. Department of Orthopedics District 1,the Yellow River Sanmenxia Hospital,Sanmenxia,Henan 472000,China
  • Received:2023-09-05 Online:2024-07-20 Published:2024-07-20

摘要: 目的 探讨创面负压治疗(NPWT)联合骨膜牵张术治疗糖尿病足的临床疗效。方法 2022年6月~2023年4月我院收治的糖尿病足病人129例,采用随机数字1∶1列表法,随机分为联合组(43例)、负压组(43例)和对照组(43例),对照组采用常规治疗,负压组采用NPWT,联合组采用NPWT 联合骨膜牵张技术,比较三组治疗有效率、炎性指标水平、外周血象水平、视觉疼痛(VAS)评分、足部相关指标水平。结果 治疗4周后联合组VAS评分、白细胞计数、降钙素原、白细胞介素-6、超敏 C-反应蛋白均低于其他两组(P均<0.05);联合组治疗有效率、足温、趾端血氧、踝肱指数、血管内径、血流流速、灌注指数水平高于其他两组(P<0.05)。结论 NPWT联合骨膜牵张术能有效缓解疼痛,改善足部血液供应,缓解机体炎性反应。

关键词: 创面负压治疗, 骨膜牵张术, 糖尿病足

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical study of the treatment of Diabetic foot with wound negative pressure treatment (NPWT) combined with periosteal distraction.Methods 129 patients with Diabetic foot admitted to our hospital from June 2022 to April 2023 were randomly divided into a combination group (n=43),a negative pressure group (n=43),and a control group (n=43).The control group was treated with conventional treatment,the negative pressure group was treated with NPWT,and the combined group was combined with periosteal distraction technique on the basis of the negative pressure group.The treatment efficiency,inflammatory index level,peripheral blood picture level,visual pain (VAS) score,and foot related index level of the three groups were compared.Results After 4 weeks of treatment,the scores of pain scale (VAS),white blood cell count (WBC),Calcitonin (PCT),Interleukin 6 (IL-6),and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs CRP) in the combined group were lower than those in the other two groups (P<0.05);The effective rate,foot temperature,toe blood oxygen,Ankle-brachial pressure index,vascular diameter,blood flow velocity,and perfusion index (PI) of the combined group were higher than those of the other two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of wound negative pressure therapy and periosteal distraction surgery can effectively alleviate pain,improve foot blood supply,and alleviate inflammatory reactions.

Key words: negative pressure treatment of wound surface, periosteal distraction surgery, diabetic foot

[1] 丁文茂, 李岚, 王松山. 超声清创联合湿性疗法在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(4): 382-384.
[2] 谢群, 张瑞瑞, 山超等. 人工真皮移植联合藻酸盐辅料治疗糖尿病足的疗效评估[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(9): 813-815.
[3] 韩伟峰 王冰. 负压创面引流技术在糖尿病足治疗中的作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(9): 647-649.
[4] 王金龙;徐斌;王兵. 封闭负压引流技术在糖尿病足治疗中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(8): 597-598.
[5] 谷涌泉 . 糖尿病足下肢动脉闭塞性病变的外科治疗进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(5): 318-318.
[6] 王冰 孟烨 韩伟峰. 糖尿病足溃疡外科治疗的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(3): 186-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[2] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[3] 胡光俊;宋晓阳;陶军. 右美托咪定添加到罗哌卡因中对腰丛坐骨神经阻滞及镇静的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 796 .
[4] 涂儒鸿;黄昌明. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术淋巴结清扫技巧[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 809 .
[5] 陈凛;崔建新. 胃癌术后复发与再手术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 813 .
[6] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[7] 刘江豪;李刚;张克强;等. 机器人辅助甲状腺切除术和腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗cN0期分化型甲状腺癌的有效性、安全性Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 852 .
[8] 严文波;潘伟华;武志祥;等. 新生儿先天性腹裂外科处理后转归[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 879 .
[9] 戴玮;邱建平;高泉根;等. 腹膜前间隙修补术在股疝治疗中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 826 .
[10] 林海鹏;卢晓明;管日戬;等. ω-3鱼油脂肪乳对老年胃癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(12): 907 .