临床外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 481-483.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2024.05.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同手术方式对女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌治疗效果及切口美容满意度的影响

  

  1. 150001   哈尔滨,北大荒集团总医院肿瘤外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-26 修回日期:2023-05-26 接受日期:2023-05-26 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-05-25

The influence of different surgical methods on the treatment effect of female unilateral cT1N0-1a thyroid cancer and the satisfaction of incision beauty

  1. Department of Oncology Surgery,Beidahuang Industry Group General Hospital,Harbin 150001,China
  • Received:2023-05-26 Revised:2023-05-26 Accepted:2023-05-26 Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-25

摘要: 目的  对比两种不同手术方式治疗女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌的效果及切口美容满意度。方法 2020年10月~2022年9月收治的女性单侧cT1N0-1a期甲状腺癌病人120例,按手术方式不同分为开放组(65例)与经口组(55例),开放组行传统开放甲状腺手术,经口组行经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺手术,比较两组病人术中情况、术后并发症及术后切口美容满意度。结果 经口组手术时间为(124.40±11.59)分钟,清扫中央区淋巴结所用时间为(26.44±5.33)分钟,开放组分别为(65.91±11.44)分钟和(17.38±4.32)分钟,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经口组术后Vancouver瘢痕评分为(3.29±0.96)分,病人瘢痕评分为(8.62±1.57)分,观察者瘢痕评分(6.67±1.17)分,瘢痕自我意识评分(1.65±0.70)分,开放组分别为(5.29±1.20)分、(15.02±2.85)分、(19.57±2.94)分、(3.12±0.98)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间、中央区淋巴结清扫数量比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。经口组与开放组术后并发症(声音嘶哑、饮水呛咳、术后出血、皮下积液)的总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(7.2%比7.6%,P>0.05)。结论 两种手术方式各有优势,术后并发症发生率低,均安全、可靠,经口组病人对术后切口美容满意度更高,可根据病人具体情况选择合适的术式。

关键词: 甲状腺肿瘤, 经口腔前庭, 术后并发症, 外科手术, 美容满意度

Abstract: Objective  To compare the effects of two different surgical methods in the treatment of female unilateral cT1N0-1a thyroid cancer and the satisfaction of incision cosmetics.Methods A retrospective analysis of the data of female patients with unilateral cT1N0-1a stage thyroid cancer in our hospital from October 2020 to September 2022 was conducted.They were divided into open group(65 cases) and oral group(55 cases) according to different surgical methods.Patients in open group were underwent traditional open thyroid surgery,and patients in oral group were underwent transoral vestibular approach laparoscopic thyroid surgery.Intraoperative conditions,postoperative complications and  satisfaction degree of postoperative incision beauty between the two groups were comparded.Results The operation time was (124.40±11.59)minutes and the dissection time of the central lymph node was (26.44±5.33)minutes in the transoral group,which were longer than those in the open group [(65.91±11.44)minutes and (17.38±4.32)minutes,(P<0.05)].Vancouver scar evaluation [(3.29±0.96)points],patient scar evaluation [(8.62±1.57)points],observer scar evaluation [(6.67±1.17)points] and scar self awareness score [(1.65±0.70)points] in the oral group were significantly lower than those in the open group [(5.29±1.20)points,(15.02±2.85)points,(19.57±2.94)points and (3.12±0.98)points,(P<0.05)].There were no significant difference in the amount of blood loss,the amount of drainage,the number of days in hospital and the number of central lymph nodes dissection between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in  total incidence of postoperative complications(hoarseness,cough after drinking water,postoperative bleeding,subcutaneous effusion) between oral group and open group(7.2% vs 7.6%,P>0.05).Conclusion  The two surgical methods have their own advantages,the incidence of postoperative complications is low,safe and reliable,and the patients in the oral group are more satisfied with the cosmetology of the postoperative incision.In actual clinical work,the appropriate operation can be chosen according to the specific conditions of the patients.

Key words: thyroid tumor, via oral vestibule, postoperative complications, surgery, cosmetic satisfaction

[1] 李婷婷 陈莉. 机器人在乳腺手术中的困境与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2024, 32(3): 228-230.
[2] 黄成校 高超 丁非凡. 保留皮神经游离腕横纹皮瓣修复手指C形软组织缺损的手术方法及临床效果研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 670-672.
[3] 何辉虎 徐如彬 姚启杨 夏国志. 经盲肠末端回肠插管造口术在保护高危直肠吻合口中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 461-465.
[4] 孙小亮 鲁瑶. 外科手术在继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症中的地位[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 216-218.
[5] 吴鉴今 曲乐丰. 颈动脉体瘤外科诊疗理念更新和技术进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1113-1115.
[6] 邓涛 何杰. 基于膜解剖下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术对泌尿功能的保护作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(12): 1164-1166.
[7] 毕华强 夏锋. 免疫时代肝癌外科治疗策略的转变与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(10): 904-906.
[8] 李江利 张士虎 王昆 等. 甲状腺嗜酸细胞癌一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(1): 72-73.
[9] 宓嘉辉 周健 杨帆. 二区近红外荧光显像技术在外科领域的应用进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 786-789.
[10] 陈韬羽 崔静 刘坤 孟俊鹏 杨明 吴河水. 伴有舌部溃疡及皮损表现的腹膜后巨大Castleman病一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 631-633.
[11] 郭德凯 刘蕾 马睿锐 贡海兵 李兵兵 高翔 江雨波 汪洋 王从俊. 高龄病人行胰十二指肠切除术探讨[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7): 653-656.
[12] 中国医师协会急救复苏专业委员会创伤骨科与多发伤学组 中国医药教育学会骨质疾病专业委员会修复重建学组 中国老年学和老年医学学会老年病分会骨科专家委员会 中华医学会骨科学分会青年骨质疏松学组/曹发奇 闫晨晨 薛航 苏佳灿 张英泽 刘国辉. 中国老年髋部骨折病人行微创手术治疗专家共识[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(4): 394-400.
[13] 何领 徐鲲 任明 陈晨 郭嵩 朱太阳 陈德轩 高国宇 王高元. 伴桥本甲状腺炎的甲状腺乳头状癌临床病理特征及其手术策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(1): 40-43.
[14] 孙启刚, 符策雄, 郑进方. 绕肝悬吊前入路右半肝切除术在肝癌手术中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 748-750.
[15] 王振军 胡子龙. 直肠癌的治疗进展和看法[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 409-411.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡善彪;余少杰;彭龙开. 婴幼儿供肾移植[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 741 .
[2] 昌盛. 中国心脏死亡捐献供肾器官的维护[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 744 .
[3] 贺长林;黎秋曦;刘锋;等. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹及再手术的处理体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 802 .
[4] 方军;余阳;许涛;等. 小野寺营养预后指数在胃癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 831 .
[5] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[6] 沙米尔;丁佑铭;汪斌;等. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜两种术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 872 .
[7] 严文波;潘伟华;武志祥;等. 新生儿先天性腹裂外科处理后转归[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 879 .
[8] 朱旭阳;朱学锋. 乳腺癌改良根治术后负压引流管的改良应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 867 .
[9] 张华园;高峰;董军等. 颅内多发脑膜瘤一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 319 .
[10] 范强金;郑鹏超;李振军. 原发性肺软骨肉瘤病一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(4): 320 .