临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1196-1199.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.12.024

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

切开复位克氏针内固定术和闭合复位Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗新鲜不稳定舟状骨腰部骨折的疗效比较

  

  1. 075000 河北省张家口市第一医院骨二科
  • 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-15
  • 基金资助:
    张家口市科技攻关计划项目(401913601)

Comparison of the efficacy of open reduction Kirschner wire internal fixation and closed reduction Herbert screw internal fixation in the treatment of fresh unstable scaphoid fracture

  1. Department of Orthopedics Ⅱ,The First Hospital of Zhangjiakou City,Hunan,Zhangjiakou 075000, China
  • Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-01-15

摘要: 目的 探讨切开复位克氏针内固定术和闭合复位Herbert螺钉内固定术治疗新鲜不稳定舟状骨腰部骨折的临床疗效。方法 选取2020年1月~2022年1月就诊于本院的新鲜不稳定舟状骨腰部骨折病人72例,采用随机数字法分为两组,试验组36例,采用切开复位克氏针内固定术,对照组36例,采用闭合复位Herbert螺钉内固定术。观察两组病人手术时间、骨折愈合时间、12周愈合率、并发症率、舟状骨坏死率,术后6个月和12个月腕关节功能恢复情况,包括腕关节活动度、改良Mayo腕关节功能评分,疼痛指数采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)。结果 两组手术时间、骨折愈合时间、愈合率、并发症比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,试验组和对照组病人尺偏、桡偏、背伸、掌屈等腕关节活动度较术前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后两组腕关节活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与术后6个月比,试验组术后12个月的Mayo评分显著改善[(95.36±3.34)分 vs.(78.52±5.62) 分](P<0.05),VAS评分显著降低[(1.04±2.24)分 vs.(3.25±1.62分)],两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后12个月两组Mayo评分和VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与闭合复位Herbert螺钉内固定术比较,切开复位克氏针内固定术能取得满意效果,但其手术费用、手术难度相对较低。

关键词: 舟状骨骨折, 切开复位克氏针内固定术, Herbert螺钉内固定术, 腕关节, 疗效比较

Abstract: Objective  To explore and compare the efficacy of open reduction Kirschner-wire internal fixation and closed reduction Herbert screw internal fixation in the treatment of fresh unstable scaphoid lumbar fracture. Methods 72 patients with fresh unstable scaphoid lumbar fracture admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and randomly divided into the experimental group(36 cases,open reduction Kirschberg wire internal fixation) and the control group(36 cases,closed reduction Herbert screw internal fixation).The operation time,fracture healing time,healing rate at 12 weeks,complication rate,scaphoid osteonecrosis rate,wrist functional recovery 6 months and 1 year after surgery were observed and compared within 2 groups,including wrist range of motion,improved Mayo wrist function score,pain index using visual analog scale(VAS).Results There were no significant differences in operation time,fracture healing time,healing rate and complication rate in 2 groups(P>0.05).6 months after surgery,the wrist motion of ulnar deviation,radial deviation,dorsalis extension and palmaris flexion in 2 groups were significantly improved compared with before surgery(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in wrist motion in 2 groups after surgery(P>0.05).Compared with 6 months after surgery,Mayo score of experimental group was significantly improved at 12 months after surgery(95.36±3.34) vs.(78.52±5.62)(P<0.05),and VAS was significantly decreased(1.04±2.24) vs.(3.25±1.62)(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in Mayo score and VAS between 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with closed reduction and Herbert screw internal fixation,open reduction and Kirschner wire internal fixation can also achieve satisfactory results.However,the operation cost and difficulty of Kirschner wire internal fixation are relatively low.

Key words: scaphoid fracture, open reduction Kirschner wire internal fixation, Herbert screw internal fixation, wrist joint, comparison of efficacy

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!