临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1191-1195.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.12.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

显微内镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱症的疗效观察

  

  1. 056002 河北省邯郸市第一医院脊柱与骨肿瘤一科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-21 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-15
  • 基金资助:
    河北省邯郸市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(21422083068)

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with microscope in treatment of senile degenerative spondylolisthesis

  1. Department of Spine and Bone Tumor,The First Hospital of Handan City,Hebei,Handan 056002, China
  • Received:2023-02-21 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-01-15

摘要: 目的 探讨显微内镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MISTLIF)治疗老年退变性腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效。方法 2020年1月~2021年3月收治的老年退变性腰椎滑脱症病人100例,根据手术方法分为MISTLIF组和经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合(TLIF)组,均为50例。比较两组围手术期指标、手术前后的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会评估治疗分数(JOA)和功能障碍评分(ODI)、术后植骨融合率及并发症发生情况。 结果 MIS-TLIF组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后引流量和住院时间分别为(167.5±54.2)分钟、(173.8±47.1)ml、(3.5±0.7)cm、(69.6±16.3)ml、(8.3±2.7)天,TLIF组分别为(136.3±38.9)分钟,(281.0±50.3)ml、(10.0±2.1)cm、(148.4±28.2)ml、(11.2±3.1)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MIS-TLIF组术后1个月VAS、 JOA和ODI评分分别为(2.17±0.62)分、(21.72±3.14)分、(13.22±2.43)分;TLIF组分别为(3.24±1.06)分、(17.06±2.85)分、(16.83±2.87)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组病人术后12个月时植骨融合率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MIS-TLIF组和TLIF组术后并发症发生率分别为8.00%和24.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 显微内镜辅助下MIS-TLIF治疗创伤小、恢复快、术后并发症少。

关键词: 显微内镜, 微创, 经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术, 退变性腰椎滑脱症, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic assisted minimally invasive trans foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and traditional open TLIF in the treatment of senile degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 2020 to March 2021, 100 elderly patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis were selected and divided into MIS-TLIF group and TLIF group according to the surgical method,with 50 cases in each group.The preoperative and postoperative VAS,Japanese 0rthopedic Association score (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI),and the rate of interbody fusion and the incidence of complications were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results In MIS-TLIF group, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay were (167.5±54.2) minutes, (173.8±47.1) ml, (3.5±0.7) cm, (69.6±16.3) ml, and (8.3±2.7) days, respectively.In the TLIF group, it was (136.3±38.9) minutes, (281.0±50.3) ml, (10.0±2.1) cm, (148.4±28.2) ml, and (11.2±3.1) days, respectively.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The VAS, JOA and ODI scores of MIS-TLIF group were (2.17±0.62)points, (21.72±3.14)points and (13.22±2.43)points, respectively.The results in TLIF group were (3.24±1.06) points, (17.06±2.85) points and (16.83±2.87) points, respectively, and there was statistical significance between the two groups (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of interbody fusion between the two groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in MIS-TLIF group(8.00%) was significantly lower than that in TLIF group(24.00%,P<0.05). Conclusion MIS-TLIF assisted by endoscope has the advantages of less trauma,faster recovery and less postoperative complications,and the short-term curative effect is more satisfactory than TLIF.

Key words: microscope, minimally invasive, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, senile degenerative spondylolisthesis, effect

[1] 姜兆磊 梅举. 微创Morrow联合二尖瓣缘对缘修复技术治疗肥厚型梗阻性心肌病[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 808-810.
[2] 朱新新 骆建军 王晓霞 蒋光伟 王黎鹏 郭起峰 孟威 邹春喜 杨箬箬 吴舒沁 吴倩. 床旁纤维支气管镜治疗对创伤性颅脑损伤合并肺部感染机械通气病人的临床影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 826-829.
[3] 胡家瑞 宋明 余来. 经皮微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(9): 881-884.
[4] 林川 王海波 章久武 吴涛 权良明. 负压吸引清石鞘辅助经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的疗效及术后感染的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(8): 768-772.
[5] 卢建利 贺伟 刘进衡. 基于倾向性评分匹配法评价三种方法治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 635-639.
[6] 辛国军 李宝定 田明国 张多强 李明皓 杨勇. 腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并肝硬化的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(7): 640-643.
[7] 刘智敏 任东林. 复杂性肛瘘诊疗中的挑战与展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 501-505.
[8] 柯磊 张庆怡 汪路明 周春琳 马洪海 俞豪杰 何哲浩 胡坚. 可塑性蛇形腔镜手术辅助臂的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(6): 568-570.
[9] 王世丽 吴谋东 安妮妮 马洪. 机器人在小儿泌尿疾病中的应用现状与展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 407-410.
[10] 张玉茹 陈江龙 林珊 何少华 徐迪. 单孔腹腔镜研究进展及其在小儿外科中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(5): 411-414.
[11] 鲁顺立 吕豹 张宁. CT三维重建技术应用于骶髂关节前方钢板治疗不稳定性骨盆骨折的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 317-320.
[12] 严凤翔. 辅助TriGen交锁髓内钉联合肩外展架治疗肱骨近端骨折临床疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 330-333.
[13] 司宇光 吴国庆 袁成龙. 不同腹部辅助性切口对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人肠道功能及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 353-356.
[14] 蒙建源 黄海 朱刚健. 不同术式对腹股沟疝的治疗效果、预后及疼痛的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 368-371.
[15] 徐玲 潘华锋. 微创旋切术、开放手术、穿刺抽液术治疗脓肿期浆细胞性乳腺炎的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 223-226.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!