临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 1172-1175.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.12.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性复杂性阑尾炎治疗中的有效性及安全性分析:一项单中心、回顾性研究

  

  1. 100049 北京,航天中心医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-11 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-15

Efficacy and safety of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis: a single center,retrospective study

  1. Department of General Surgery,Aerospace Center Hospital,Beijing 100049,China
  • Received:2023-01-11 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-01-15

摘要: 目的 探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)在急性复杂性阑尾炎治疗中的有效性及安全性。方法 我院普外科2014年4月~2022年8月急诊行腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的复杂性阑尾炎病人1104例,其中行SILA788例,传统三孔LA316例,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后第1天白细胞数值、术后排气时间、住院时间、术后病理及术后并发症发生情况。结果 SILA组手术时间(68.26±22.29)分钟、术中出血量(15.93±13.10)ml、术后排气时间(2.29±0.52)天、术后第1天白细胞(11.12±1.67)×109/L;LA组手术时间(66.47±20.40)分钟、术中出血量(16.65±12.98)ml、术后排气时间(2.23±0.58)天、术后第1天白细胞(11.35±1.54)×109/L,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后随访1个月,两组均无切口疝等并发症;SILA 组病人腹部切口美容效果满意;SILA 组住院时间(4.60±1.18)天,少于LA组的(4.93±1.71)天,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在熟练掌握LA操作的基础上,SILA安全可行,其除有瘢痕隐蔽美观功能外,并不延长手术时间、增加术后并发症风险。

关键词: 经脐单孔腹腔镜, 阑尾切除术, 复杂性阑尾炎

Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy in acute complicated appendicitis. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted for the data of 1104 patients with complicated appendicitis who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy at the Department of General Surgery of Aerospace Center Hospital from April 2014 to August 2022;among them,788 patients underwent transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) and 316 cases underwent traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (LA);the operation time,intraoperative blood loss,leukocyte value on the first day after surgery,postoperative exhaust time,hospital stay,postoperative pathology and postoperative complications were statistically analyzed. Results The surgical duration of the single hole laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) group was (68.26±22.29) minutes,intraoperative blood loss was (15.93±13.10) ml,postoperative exhaust time was (2.29±0.52) days,and white blood cells were (11.12±1.67)×109/L on the first day after surgery,and the surgical duration of the hree hole laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) groupwas (66.47±20.40) minutes,intraoperative blood loss was (16.65±12.98) ml,postoperative exhaust time was (2.23±0.58) days,and white blood cells were (11.35±1.54)×109/L on the first day after surgery,there was no statistically significant difference in the data between each group(P>0.05).After 1 month of follow-up,no incisional hernia and other complications occurred in the two groups,the cosmetic effect of abdominal incision in SILA group was satisfactory,the hospitalization time of SILA group was (4.60±1.18) days,which was shorter than that in the traditional LA group (4.93±1.71) days,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Based on proficiency in traditional LA operations,SILA is safe and viable;in addition to the hidden aesthetic function of scars,it does not prolong the operation time and increase the risk of postoperative complications.

Key words: transumbilical single-port laparoscopy, appendectomy, complex appendicitis

[1] 邱谢武 王文卿 刘清 曹道成. 腹壁穿刺缝合针辅助自制单孔装置行阑尾切除术的临床效果研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(9): 844-847.
[2] 孔韦奇 陈中皓 胡月梅 廖作富 王冰一. 急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后病理诊断为阑尾憩室炎一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 559-560.
[3] 梁文杰 黎然 冯疆勉 李卫伶 洪文彬. 改良Karl-storz单孔腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及对免疫功能和炎症反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1155-1158.
[4] 王海霖 段光辉 田运 刘宏斌. 肠镜下治疗阑尾术后盲肠-腹壁瘘一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 846-847.
[5] 谭华勇, 刘焱伟, 付应峰等. 腹腔镜手术治疗根部坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 570-571.
[6] 陈小保 李明武 刘思义. 腹腔镜诊治疑似急性阑尾炎的临床价值分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 347-349.
[7] 邹来宾 何天 陈亮 王健 马克强 曹天生. 腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗根部坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(12): 1147-1149.
[8] 黄志良, 霍中华, 束一鸣. 内镜下逆行阑尾治疗术在急性阑尾炎治疗中的应用研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(11): 1028-1031.
[9] 巴雅尔, 李钢, 高洪强, 卢晖, 张荣. 经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腔镜胆囊切除术的比较分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 155-157.
[10] 孙静秋, 朱从元, 王珂, 华玉明. 三种不同戳孔入路在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1037-1040.
[11] 胡军, 李绍员, 李包根, 罗俊峰. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾根部结扎与Hem-o-lok夹闭的对比研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 920-921.
[12] 魏晓平;田大广;胡明道等. 经脐上缘单孔腹腔镜胆囊阑尾联合切除术[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2012, 20(12): 858-859.
[13] 余东海 张文 孙晓毅 冯杰雄 魏明发 易斌 李宁 翁一珍. 腹腔镜治疗小儿阑尾炎148例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2011, 19(10): 704-704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 方军;余阳;许涛;等. 小野寺营养预后指数在胃癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 831 .
[2] 周力;王晓辉;李小军;等. 腹腔镜下治疗直肠癌同时伴右半结肠癌手术体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 848 .
[3] 刘江豪;李刚;张克强;等. 机器人辅助甲状腺切除术和腔镜甲状腺切除术治疗cN0期分化型甲状腺癌的有效性、安全性Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 852 .
[4] 张重捷;陈杰;邹奇;等. 两种微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 869 .
[5] 朱旭阳;朱学锋. 乳腺癌改良根治术后负压引流管的改良应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 867 .
[6] 赵文斌;凃峰;张晨等. 肱骨近端锁定钢板与近端锁定钢板联合内侧普通钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折合并中段骨折的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 359 -0 .
[7] 金祺;阮文枫;赵欣宇等. Buck技术结合钉棒系统治疗青少年峡部裂性腰椎滑脱一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 347 -0 .
[8] 戴静;钱群. 2017.V1版《NCCN直肠癌诊治指南》更新解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 245 .
[9] 王振军 . 内括约肌切除术治疗超低位直肠癌的进展和新问题[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 251 .
[10] 许平平;许剑民. 机器人在结直肠癌手术中的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 255 .