临床外科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 686-689.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.07.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声引导下侧路联合髂腹下/髂腹股沟腹横肌平面两点阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用

  

  1. 232001〓 安徽理工大学附属淮南东方医院集团总医院麻醉科(刘仑、鲍翊凡),普外科(孟云)
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-02 接受日期:2022-11-02 出版日期:2023-07-20 发布日期:2023-07-20

Application of ultrasound-guided lateral approach combined with iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal TAP two-point block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

  1. Huainan Oriental Hospital Group,Anhui University of Science and Technology, Anhui,Huainan 232001,China
  • Received:2022-11-02 Accepted:2022-11-02 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-20

摘要: 目的  探讨超声引导下侧路联合髂腹下/髂腹股沟腹横肌平面(transversus abdominis plane,TAP)两点阻滞在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果。 方法   2021年1月~2022年4月我院行单侧腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的病人88例,根据随机数字表法将病人分为观察组和对照组,每组各44例,对照组在全身麻醉后采用侧路TAP阻滞,观察组在全身麻醉后采用侧路联合髂腹下/髂腹股沟TAP两点阻滞。比较两组病人在切皮时(T1)、术后3小时(T2)、术后6小时(T3)、术后12小时(T4)、术后24小时(T5)等5个时间点的心率和平均动脉压波动率,采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)比较两组病人在T2~T5时的疼痛程度,比较两组病人麻醉效果满意度。 结果   两组病人均顺利完成手术,观察组在T2~T4静息时VAS评分分别为(2.04±0.55)、(2.41±0.57)和(2.95±0.70)分,活动时VAS评分分别为(2.82±0.59)、(3.16±0.68)和(3.80±0.77)分,对照组在T2~T4静息时VAS评分分别为(2.32±0.69)、(3.29±0.77)和(3.54±1.08)分,活动时VAS评分分别为(3.55±0.83)、(4.07±0.91)和(4.34±1.05)分,观察组VAS评分低于对照组,静息时VAS≥4分的比例更低(20.45% VS.47.73%),在T2~T5时观察组血流动力学更加平稳,麻醉效果满意度显著好于对照组(93.18% VS.70.45%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论   在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中采用TAP两点阻滞,术后镇痛效果好,血流动力学平稳,麻醉效果优于侧路TAP阻滞。


关键词: 超声引导, 腹横肌平面阻滞, 髂腹下/髂腹股沟, 腹股沟疝修补术

Abstract: Objective   To explore the effect of application of ultrasound-guided lateral approach combined with iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal transversus abdominis plane(TAP) two-point block in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods   88 patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair in our hospital from January 2021 to April 2022 were enrolled as the study subjects.The patients were divided into observation group (n=44) and control group (n=44) according to the random number table.In the control group,lateral TAP block was used after general anesthesia,and in the observation group,lateral combined iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal TAP two-point block was used after general anesthesia.The volatility of heart rate and mean arterial pressure were  analyzed and compared between the two groups at five time points:skin incision (T1),3 hours after surgery (T2),6 hours after surgery (T3),12 hours after surgery (T4),and 24 hours after surgery (T5),and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to compare the degree of pain at T2-T5 between the two groups,and the satisfaction of anesthetic effect was compared between the two groups. Results   The two groups of patients were successfully completed the operation.In the observation group,the VAS scores at rest at T2-T4 were (2.04±0.55),(2.41±0.57) and (2.95±0.70) points,the VAS scores at activity were (2.82±0.59),(3.16±0.68) and (3.80±0.77) points,in the control group,the VAS scores at rest were (2.32±0.69),(3.29±0.77) and (3.54±1.08) points,and (3.55±0.83),(4.07±0.91) and (4.34±1.05) points at activity,respectively.The VAS scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and the proportion of VAS≥4 points at rest was lower (20.45% VS.47.73%).At T2-T5,the hemodynamics in the observation group were more stable,and the satisfaction rate of anesthetic effect was significantly better than that in the control group (93.18% VS.70.45%),and the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion   In laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair,the use of TAP two-point block anesthesia has better postoperative analgesia,more stable hemodynamics,and better anesthesia than lateral TAP block.

Key words: ultrasound guidance, transversus abdominis plane block, iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal, inguinal hernia repair

[1] 蒙建源 黄海 朱刚健. 不同术式对腹股沟疝的治疗效果、预后及疼痛的影响因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(4): 368-371.
[2] 胡宗云. 腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2023, 31(3): 264-266.
[3] 张海华 熊华平 庄海滨 李巧云. 超声引导下不同入路坐骨神经阻滞在踝部骨折病人麻醉中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(8): 780-782.
[4] 刘琦 万玉文 李晓强. 椎管内麻醉联合超声引导下闭孔神经阻滞与全身麻醉相比对经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术病人术后肿瘤复发影响的临床研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 506-509.
[5] 陈默曦 高晓云 徐成 吴强 许涛 江伟. 不同剂量右美托咪定混合罗哌卡因腰丛阻滞应用于小儿髋关节手术的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 514-517.
[6] 童卫国 孙桂珍. 甲磺酸罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因在疝囊高位结扎术超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞中的应用比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(6): 535-538.
[7] 邱欣国 崔喆. 轻量立体3D补片对腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝病人并发症、疼痛及生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(11): 1068-1071.
[8] 吴豪 余挺 李麟 殷国江 谈世刚 夏中元. 超声引导法桡动脉置管对血管损伤并发症发生率及恢复情况的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 889-891.
[9] 周麟, 潘华锋, 李琰. 超声引导下经皮微波消融与无水酒精注射微创治疗囊实性良性甲状腺结节的临床疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(6): 517-520.
[10] 沈柏儒, 宋长山, 吴旭辉等. 超声引导射频消融联合胸腔靶向灌注对肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(4): 363-366.
[11] 杨丽 朱荔 刘紫朦 鲍宝石 马金平 王建东. 超声引导下空芯针穿刺活检对乳腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(3): 231-234.
[12] 刘苹 吴茜 王思桦 姚尚龙. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞对保留自主呼吸的胸腔镜手术术后镇痛及应激反应的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 784-786.
[13] 姚建锋, 田利飞, 张晓龙等. 基于单中心的不同手术组人员成人腹股沟疝修补术现状调查[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 572-574.
[14] 陈超 梅伟. 超声引导外周神经阻滞在髋部骨折手术中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 391-393.
[15] 刘永琛, 宋牧野, 吴泽宇. 微创介入治疗在甲状腺疾病中的应用与争议[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(3): 221-223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!