清创联合负压封闭引流治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.005

临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 1115-1118.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.12.005

清创联合负压封闭引流治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响

434300 湖北省荆州市公安县人民医院普外科

收稿日期:2022-09-14 接受日期:2022-09-14 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-20

Effect of debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing and infection in patients with deep second-degree burn

Department of General Surgery,People's Hospital of Gongan County,Hubei，Jingzhou, 434300, China

Received:2022-09-14 Accepted:2022-09-14 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [摘要] 目的探讨清创联合负压封闭引流技术（VSD）治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响。方法 2018年3月～2021年3月本院收治的深Ⅱ度烧伤病人90例，根据治疗意愿分为两组，对照组49例，行清创联合常规换药治疗，观察组41例，行清创联合VSD治疗，比较两组病人创面愈合情况。结果观察组完全愈合时间为(23.48±4.27)天，明显短于对照组的(26.57±3.84)天，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组和对照组7天（T₁）、14天（T₂）、21天（T₃）时创面愈合率分别为(14.64±3.27)%和(11.57±3.51)%，(54.38±10.63)%和(40.41±9.58)%，(75.26±8.47)%和(62.19±9.03)%，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，观察组和对照组VAS评分分别为(3.54±1.27)分和(4.75±1.13)分，(2.24±0.78)分和(3.05±0.81)分，(1.84±0.56)分和（2.47±0.62)分，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。T1时，观察组和对照组创面红肿分别为(41.46%和63.27%，创面分泌物发生率分别为(43.90%和63.27%，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；T1、T2时，观察组和对照组创面感染率分别为2.42%和20.41%、0.00%和14.29%，细菌培养阳性率分别为4.89%和26.53%、2.42%和18.37%，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；术后半年，观察组和对照组瘢痕发生率分别为14.63%和36.73%、VSS评分分别为(5.64±1.53)分和(8.25±2.17)分，两组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论清创联合VSD治疗能有效提高深Ⅱ度烧伤病人的创面愈合率，缩短创面愈合时间，降低创面感染率及伤口疼痛水平，减少瘢痕的发生。

关键词: 深度烧伤, 电刀清创, 负压伤口治疗, 创面愈合

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing and infection in patients with deep second-degree burn.Methods Ninety patients with burn treated in the hospital from March 2018 to March 2021 were selected as the research subjects.Among them,49 patients treated with debridement combined with routine dressing change were included in the control group,while 41 patients treated with debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy were included in the observation group.Wound healing status was compared between the two groups.Results The complete healing time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group [(23.48±4.27) d vs.(26.57±3.84) d] (P＜0.05).The wound healing rates in the observation group at T1,T2 and T3 were higher than those of the control group [(14.64±3.27)% vs.(11.57±3.51)%,(54.38±10.63)% vs.(40.41±9.58)%,(75.26±8.47)% vs.(62.19±9.03)%],and VAS scores were lower than those of the control group [(3.54±1.27) vs.(4.75±1.13),(2.24±0.78) vs.(3.05±0.81),(1.84±0.56) vs.(2.47±0.62)] (P＜0.05).At T1,the incidences of wound redness and secretion in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (41.46% vs.63.27%,43.90% vs.63.27%) (P＜0.05).The wound infection rates and positive rates of secretion bacterial culture in the observation group at T1 and T2 were lower than those in the control group (2.42% vs.20.41%,0.00% vs.14.29%;4.89% vs.26.53%,2.42% vs.18.37%) (P＜0.05).At 6 months after treatment,the incidence of scar and VSS score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group [14.63% vs.36.73%,(5.64±1.53) vs.(8.25±2.17)] (P＜0.05).Conclusion Debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy can effectively improve wound healing rate in patients with deep second-degree burn,shorten wound healing time,and reduce wound infection rate,wound pain and scar formation.

Key words: deep burn, electrotome debridement, negative pressure wound therapy, wound healing

张小华林光明郭鹏熊鑫苏刚刘杨胡大迁张旭东. 清创联合负压封闭引流治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1115-1118.

ZHANG Xiaohua, LIN Guangming, GUO Peng, et al. Effect of debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing and infection in patients with deep second-degree burn[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2022, 30(12): 1115-1118.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	阿布力克木·毛拉尤甫;郑秉礼. 胰腺实性假乳头状瘤45例手术治疗分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 764 .
[2]	胡志伟;汪忠镐;张玉;等. 腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗干燥综合征合并严重胃食管反流病两例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 766 .
[3]	宋华;单若冰;张晋绥;等. 产前超声诊断对新生儿消化道梗阻性疾病手术治疗价值的观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 780 .
[4]	曾杨军;胡万里;程龙等. 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术和电切术治疗良性前列腺增生对性功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 386 -0 .
[5]	胡丹郝跃峰司卫兵等. 关节镜技术监视下治疗内踝骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(9): 693 .
[6]	许平平;许剑民. 机器人在结直肠癌手术中的应用现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 255 .
[7]	李祥;红梅;吴奇;等. 阿帕替尼在恶性肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(4): 314 .
[8]	孟旭;张海波;韩薇. 再议中国风湿性二尖瓣修复技术的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2017, 25(5): 335 .
[9]	任朋张烨陶建新沈仁辉王彤. 吲哚菁绿显像对减少腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后吻合口漏的作用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 754 -756 .
[10]	杜晓辉何长征. 右半结肠癌微创治疗的术式选择[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 724 -726 .

清创联合负压封闭引流治疗对深Ⅱ度烧伤病人创面愈合及感染情况的影响

Effect of debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing and infection in patients with deep second-degree burn

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	周璇金琳博张一鸣. 氧微环境对急慢性创面愈合影响的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(12): 1112-1114.
[2]	邱海军, 潘力生. 负压封闭引流技术联合自体游离皮片移植对下肢静脉性溃疡病人创面愈合及生活质量评分的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 188-190.