临床外科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 561-564.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2022.06.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

预注甘露醇对机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人视神经鞘直径和复苏质量的影响

  

  1. 430064   武汉大学人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-26 接受日期:2022-01-26 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 430064 武汉大学人民医院麻醉科

Effects of pre-administration of mannitol on optic nerve sheath diameter and postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

  1. Department of Anesthesiology,People’s Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
  • Received:2022-01-26 Accepted:2022-01-26 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-20

摘要: 目的 探讨预注甘露醇对机器人辅助下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人视神经鞘直径及复苏质量的影响。方法 2020年6月~2021年12月全身麻醉下行机器人辅助下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术病人70例。电脑随机分为两组:甘露醇组(G组)和对照组(C组),每组各35例。G组气腹即刻滴注20%甘露醇0.5g/kg,30分钟输完;C组同时间点滴注等量生理盐水。比较两组病人插管后1分钟(T0)、气腹后5分钟(T1)、气腹后30分钟(T2)、气腹后60分钟(T3)、气腹后90分钟(T4)、手术结束10分钟(T5)时视神经鞘直径(optic nerve sheath diameter,ONSD)和复苏质量的差异。结果 G组病人T2~4时ONSD分别为(4.27±0.19)mm、(4.48±0.19)mm、(4.54±0.19)mm,与T0时(4.04±0.17)mm比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);C组病人T2~4时ONSD分别为(4.38±0.26)mm、(4.66±0.28)mm、(4.90±0.26)mm,与T0时(4.00±0.23)mm比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);G组病人T3~4时ONSD分别为(4.48±0.19)mm、(4.54±0.19)mm,C组分别为(4.66±0.28)mm、(4.90±0.26)mm,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);G组苏醒时间、拔管时间和出恢复室时间分别为(20.34±6.38)分钟、(26.69±6.54)分钟、(48.74±11.40)分钟,C组分别为(47.71±10.57)分钟、(48.77±12.28)分钟和(76.74±12.57)分钟,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);G组拔管后30分钟意识状态评分(observer's assessment of alertness/sedation,OAAS)评分为4.43±0.66,C组为2.80±0.99,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);G组病人拔管后30分钟躁动评分为0.80±0.58,C组为1.63±0.84,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);G组病人头痛、眼痛发生率分别为2.9%(1/35)、5.7%(2/35),C组分别为17.1%(6/35)、25.7%(9/35),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 机器人辅助下腹腔镜直肠癌根治术预注甘露醇,可以降低术中ONSD增幅,提高术后苏醒质量,减少不良反应发生率。

关键词: 视神经鞘直径, 机器人, 甘露醇, 直肠癌根治术

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of pre-administration of mannitol on optic nerve sheath diameter and postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.Methods Seventy patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer under general anesthesia in our hospital were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups:mannitol group(group G) and control group(group C),35 cases in each.The patients in group G were infused with 20% mannitol 0.5g/kg within 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum(PP),and the patients in group C were infused with the same amount of normal saline at the same time point.The optic nerve sheath diameter was compared between the two groups at 1 min after intubation (T0), 5mins after pneumoperitoneum (T1), 30mins after pneumoperitoneum (T2), 60mins after pneumoperitoneum (T3), 90mins after pneumoperitoneum (T4), 10mins after surgery (T5) and differences in optic nerve sheath diameter and quality of resuscitation.Results The ONSDs of group G at T2-T4 were(4.27±0.19)mm,(4.48±0.19)mm and (4.54±0.19)mm,respectively,which were bigger than ONSD at T0 [(4.04±0.17)mm,P<0.05].The ONSDs of group C at T2-T4 were (4.38±0.26)mm,(4.66±0.28)mm and(4.90±0.26)mm,respectively,which were bigger than ONSD at T0 [(4.00±0.23)mm,P<0.05].There were significant differences in ONSDs between group G and group C at T3 and T4 [(4.48±0.19)mm vs (4.66±0.28)mm,P<0.05;(4.54±0.19)mm vs (4.90±0.26)mm,P<0.05].The recovery time,extubation time and PACU time in group G were (20.34±6.38)min,(26.69±6.54)min,(48.74±11.40)min,which were respectively shorter than those in group C [(47.71±10.57)min,(48.77±12.28)min and (76.74±12.57)min,P<0.05].OAAS score at 30min after extubation in group G was significantly higher than that in group C [(4.43±0.66) vs (2.80±0.99),P<0.05].Agitation score at 30min after extubation in group G was significantly lower than that in group C [(0.80±0.58) vs (1.63±0.84),P<0.05].The incidences of headache and eye pain in group G was both lower than those in group C(2.9% vs 17.1%,P<0.05;5.7% vs 25.7%,P<0.05).Cnclusiono Pre-administration of mannitol can prevent the increase of ONSD,improve the recovery quality and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions.

Key words: optic nerve sheath diameter, robot, mannitol, radical resection of rectal cancer

[1] 郑浩, 张仁泉. 浅谈早期食管癌的微创治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(8): 711-713.
[2] 冯青阳 许剑民. 机器人结直肠癌手术中国专家共识(2020版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 405-408.
[3] 隋金珂 张卫. 腹腔镜结直肠手术的现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 492-494.
[4] 桂余 陈莉. 达芬奇机器人在乳腺外科中的应用及进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(3): 292-294.
[5] 马鑫, 宣云东, 黄庆波, 张旭. 肾癌合并下腔静脉癌栓的机器人手术策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 104-107.
[6] 谢兴旺 柯超 周红见 蒋斌 韩建涛 许汉兵. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术对凝血纤溶系统、血管内皮功能及炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(12): 1155-1159.
[7] 李吉喆 赵之明 刘荣. 机器人手术在胆道疾病中应用现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(8): 701-703.
[8] 袁野 金润森 李鹤成. 机器人手术在肺癌外科的现状和展望[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 601-604.
[9] 朱余明 郑卉. 微创肺癌根治术进展与挑战[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(7): 621-623.
[10] 王序杰, 周岩冰. 机器人直肠癌手术现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(5): 489-492.
[11] 张亚飞 吴超 肖骥峰. 目标导向容量治疗对老年结直肠癌根治术病人术后认知功能障碍的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(4): 370-373.
[12] 张仁泉, 康宁, 宁郑浩. 《机器人辅助食管切除术中国临床专家建议(2019版)》解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 35-37.
[13] 张海峰, 宋栋达, 刘荣. 达芬奇机器人右半肝切除技巧与经验[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 634-637.
[14] 魏光夏, 唐建, 喻本桐 . 达芬奇机器人系统辅助与传统胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除术短期疗效对比[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 610-611.
[15] 郝志楠, 莫波, 闵春明, 何磊. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留左结肠动脉对肠系膜下动脉3型直肠癌病人临床疗效及术后并发症的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 492-494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李光焰;张安平;王祥峰;等. 直肠癌切除术后吻合口狭窄14例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 772 .
[2] 张忠伟;刘扬;路明. 痔上黏膜环切术治疗直肠前突所致出口梗阻型便秘的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 774 .
[3] 肖国栋;刘国辉. 跗骨窦切口联合经皮置钉技术微创治疗跟骨骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 783 .
[4] 杨钦;张再重;王烈. 空肠间置术在Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 816 .
[5] 应敏刚;杨春康. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术并发症的防治策略[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 819 .
[6] 石汉平. 胃癌围手术期营养治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 821 .
[7] 林伟箭;洪雪辉;许淑镇;等. 吸引器在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中的应用体会[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 824 .
[8] 方军;余阳;许涛;等. 小野寺营养预后指数在胃癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 831 .
[9] 王维君;那光玮;何科基;等. 根治性淋巴结清扫联合脾切除在残胃癌手术中的临床意义探究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 835 .
[10] 吴超;谢迪;汪全新;等. 胃癌肝转移的临床病理特征及危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2016, 24(11): 839 .