临床外科杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 121-124.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2020.02.007

• • 上一篇    下一篇

高功率钬激光在膀胱颈挛缩病人行颈部楔形切开术中的应用

  

  1. 200050 上海市同仁医院泌尿外科
  • 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵树田,Email,zst1954@shtrhospital.com

Application of high power holmium laser in wedge neck resection of patients with bladder neck contracture

  1. Department of Urology,Shanghai Tongren Hospital,Shanghai 200050,China
  • Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-20

摘要:

目的 评估高功率钬激光在膀胱颈挛缩病人行颈部楔形切开术中应用的效果及可行性。

方法 膀胱颈挛缩病人60例,随机分为对照组和实验组,每组各30例,对照组行经尿道膀胱颈电切术,实验组采用科医人80~100W,550μm钬激光手术系统实施膀胱颈部楔形切开术,观察两组的临床效果。

结果 对照组病人手术时间、导尿保留时间、术中失血量和住院时间,分别为(100.95±18.74)分钟,(7.86±1.95)天,(86.98±10.69)ml和(8.95±1.95)天;实验组分别为(26.78±4.28)分钟,(2.96±0.54)天,(10.45±1.82)ml 和(3.64±0.79)天,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组病人QOL评分、IPSS评分、PVR和Qmax差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗7天后,实验组QOL评分、IPSS评分、PVR和Qmax分别为(2.74±0.52)分,(10.68±1.94)分,(65.49±12.36)ml和(14.89±2.46)ml/s;对照组分别为(4.86±0.86)分,(15.95±2.89)分,(100.69±21.34)ml和(10.37±2.14)ml/s,均显著优于治疗前(P<0.05),实验组改善程度较大。治疗6个月后实验组QOL评分、IPSS评分、PVR和Qmax分别为(1.74±0.25)分,(6.84±1.49)分,(20.69±3.52)ml和(21.48±4.68)ml/s,对照组分别为(2.96±0.48)分,(12.74±2.35)分,(43.74±6.84)ml和(15.43±3.92)ml/s。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组和对照组并发症发生率分别为3.33%和13.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论 高功率钬激光在膀胱颈挛缩病人行颈部楔形切开术中安全有效,出血少、操作时间短、操作简便。

关键词: 高功率钬激光, 膀胱颈挛缩, 颈部, 楔形切开术, 微创

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect and feasibility of high power holmium laser wedge neck resection in patients with bladder neck contracture.

Methods 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups:30 patients in each group;the control group received transurethral resection of bladder neck;the experimental group received wedge resection of bladder neck with medical staff 80~100w and 550um holmium laser surgery system,and the clinical effect was observed.

Results Inthe control group,the operative time,catheter retention time,intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization time were(100.95±18.74)min,(7.86±1.95)d,(86.9±10.69)ml,(8.95±1.95)d,The experimental groups were(26.78±4.28)min,(2.96±0.54)d,(10.45±1.82)ml,(3.64±0.79)d,the comparison between the two was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in quality of life (QOL),international prostate symptom score (IPSS),postvoid residual volume (PVR)and  maxium urinary flow rate (Qmax)between the two groups(P>0.05).7d After treatment,QOL score,IPSS score,PVR and Qmax in the experimental group and control group were(2.74±0.52)score,(10.68±1.94)score,(65.49±12.36)ml,(14.89±2.46)ml/s;(4.86±0.86)score,(15.95±2.89)score,(100.69±21.34)ml,(10.37±2.14)ml/s,all of which were significantly better than those before treatment(P<0.05),and the improvement degree of the patients in the experimental group was greater.Six months after treatment,the QOL,IPSS,PVR and Qmax  were(1.74±0.25)score,(6.84±1.49)score,(20.69±3.52)ml and(21.48±4.68)ml/s,in the experimental group,the control group were(2.96±0.48)score,(12.74±2.35)score,(43.74±6.84)ml and(15.43±3.92)ml/s,the experimental group was better than the control group(P<0.05).The complication rate of the experimental group(3.33%)was lower than that of the control group(13.33%)(P<0.05).

Conclusion High power holmium laser is safe and effective for neck wedge resection in patients with bladder neck contracture,with less bleeding,short operation time and simple operation,which is an ideal minimally invasive surgical method.

Key words: high power holmium laser, bladder neck contracture, neck, wedge incision, minimally invasive surgery

[1] 胡卫国, 李建兴. 泌尿系结石的激光治疗现状[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 183-185.
[2] 周春根, 倪敏, 朱勇, 张睿, 黄小波, 张琪, 王领, 刘艳妮, 江滨. 肛瘘微创治疗的研究进展[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 190-192.
[3] 刘辉均, 丁茂乾, 任诗松. 经皮微创钢板接骨术技术结合锁定加压钢板内固定在四肢骨折创伤病人中的临床应用及对生活质量的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 78-81.
[4] 周晓飞, 彭金燕, 刘燕. 微创手术在脑出血治疗中的安全性及对病人血清Cys-C、AQP4的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 671-673.
[5] 杨丽君. 麦默通微创旋切术在治疗乳腺良性肿瘤中的疗效与价值[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(8): 703-704.
[6] 吴开明, 姚龙, 康宁宁等. 进展期食管癌微创治疗术后远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 558-561.
[7] 陈沛锐, 卿秋杉, 车国卫等. 术前胸中上段食管癌颈部淋巴结转移相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 566-569.
[8] 李迎全, 陈多军, 王飞等. 微创经皮接骨板技术术中双反牵引复位在胫骨中远段粉碎性骨折中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 600-602.
[9] 王伟, 罗勇, 袁武等. 冠状动脉肌桥的外科治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 603-605.
[10] 王世平. 食管癌根治食管胃颈部吻合术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 612-614.
[11] 唐银科, 姚文德, 裴蛟淼, 崔江波, 马显杰. 小切口腋下汗腺清除术的临床效果及相关因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 514-516.
[12] 唐云德, 徐卫国, 于风珍, 尚林强. 椎间孔镜微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 439-442.
[13] 罗加龙. SuperPath微创入路全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的近远期效果分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 300-303.
[14] 李维, 黄永超. 经皮微创内固定联合术后唑来膦酸治疗胸腰椎骨折的疗效及对T细胞亚群的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 345-348.
[15] 方红, 赵子伟, 韩雪, 姚永强. 麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 205-208.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 严泽军, 张栋. 泌尿系肿瘤的激光治疗[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 105 -107 .
[2] 杨国胜, 陈波特, 王镇伟. 经尿道前列腺激光手术对前列腺功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 108 -110 .
[3] 杨欢, 杨为民. 激光在腔内泌尿外科的临床应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 110 -112 .
[4] 袁晓奕. 铒激光技术治疗压力性尿失禁[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 113 -115 .
[5] 胡永珍, 李敬文, 徐忠烨, 张立阳, 温一奇, 龙青山, 李雪松. 枕下后正中入路行小脑后下动脉多发动脉瘤夹闭一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 119 -120 .
[6] 吴翠翠, 江辉, 曹雪芹, 周志强. 第一、二鳃弓综合征儿童行完壁式鼓室成形术困难气道一例[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 124 -125 .
[7] 张玲, 郭华雄, 龚平, 周家杰, 刘修恒, 沈昊. 囊性肾瘤6例的临床病理特征及预后分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 126 -129 .
[8] 吴宇波, 赵泽驹. 介入治疗Ⅲ级以上闭合性肾外伤32例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 130 -132 .
[9] 周云, 柴红超, 王静茹, 秘书芳, 郭付臣. 硅胶外支架与双J管在小儿肾积水手术中的应用比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 133 -136 .
[10] 隋宇玲. 外侧裂入路手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(2): 137 -139 .