经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与切开挂线术治疗经括约肌肛瘘的临床效果比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.06.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与切开挂线术治疗经括约肌肛瘘术后疼痛、肛门功能以及创面愈合时间的疗效。方法经括约肌肛瘘病人124例，将124例病人分成两组，试验组60例，行经括约肌间瘘管结扎术；对照组64例，行切开挂线术。比较两组的肛门失禁评分、肛门功能、术后疼痛、创面愈合时间和临床疗效。结果对照组肛门失禁总分为（8.68±1.65）分，试验组为（7.03±1.46）分；对照组肛门功能总分（6.71±0.93）分，试验组为（8.04±1.11）分；对照组术后疼痛评分为（6.22±1.24）分，试验组为（3.52±1.06）分，两组以上指标比较，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）.对照组创面愈合时间为（5.31±1.32）天，试验组为（5.78±1.43）天；对照组临床总有效率为95.31%，试验组为88.33%，两组比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论经括约肌间瘘管结扎术能够缓解经括约肌肛瘘病人术后疼痛，促进其肛门功能的提高，且临床疗效与切开挂线术比较无明显差异。

关键词: 经括约肌瘘管结扎术, 切开挂线术, 经括约肌肛瘘, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To compare the curative effect of postoperative sphincter fistula ligation and incision and suture for postoperative pain，anal function and wound healing time of sphincter anal fistula.Methods The date of 124 patients with sphincter anal fistula were retrospectively analyzed.Among them，60 patients who underwent sphincter fistula ligation were set as the study group，and 64 patients who underwent incision and suture were set as the control group.Anal incontinence score，anal function，postoperative pain，wound healing time and clinical efficacy were compared between two groups.Results The total score of anal incontinence in the control group（8.68±1.65）was significantly higher than that（7.03±1.46）in the study group，and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.The total anal function score of the control group（6.71±0.93）was significantly lower than the total anal function score of the experimental group（8.04±1.11），and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.The postoperative pain score of the control group（6.22±1.24）was significantly higher than that of the experimental group（3.52±1.06），the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）.The wound healing time of the control groupand the test There was no significant difference in the wound healing time（5.78±1.43）between control group [（5.31±1.32）d] and study group[（5.78±1.43）d](P>0.05）.The total effective rate of the control group was 95.31%，which was not significantly different from the total clinical effective rate of the experimental group（88.33%）（P>0.05）.Conclusion Ligation of sphincter fistula can significantly alleviate postoperative pain in patients with sphincter anal fistula and promote the improvement of anal function.There is no significant difference between clinical efficacy and incision and suture.It can flexible used as an ideal procedure for anal fistula in clinical practice.

Key words: sphincter fistula ligation, incision and suture, transsphincter anal fistula, anal function

张磊, 孙昱, 黄熠. 经括约肌间瘘管结扎术与切开挂线术治疗经括约肌肛瘘的临床效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.

ZHANG Lei, SUN Yu, HUANG Yi.. Comparison of postoperative sphincter fistula ligation and incision and suture for postoperative pain，anal function and wound healing time of sphincter anal fistula[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SURGERY, 2019, 27(6): 495-497.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	吴开明, 姚龙, 康宁宁等. 进展期食管癌微创治疗术后远期疗效及预后因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(7): 558-561.
[2]	万婷, 周海孝, 朱占永, 余墨声. 蝎肽抗菌凝胶联合外科手术治疗下肢静脉性溃疡的疗效观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 512-513.
[3]	王誉都, 李鹏, 高亚, 黄强. 单孔腹腔镜下经皮腹膜外结扎术治疗小儿交通性鞘膜积液的临床研究[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(6): 517-519.
[4]	张明府, 吴永丰, 柳东. 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术中保留左结肠动脉对术后吻合口漏及近期疗效的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 400-403.
[5]	唐云德, 徐卫国, 于风珍, 尚林强. 椎间孔镜微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症的临床分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(5): 439-442.
[6]	方红, 赵子伟, 韩雪, 姚永强. 麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1cm良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(3): 205-208.
[7]	庞松强, 罗功唐, 宋瑶. 3D与2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌综合效果及并发症比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 109-112.
[8]	彭华荣, 孙魁, 冯子驹. 经腹侧与经背侧超声定位在输尿管上段结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的效果比较[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(2): 126-128.
[9]	韩衍龙张诚陈冬明潘淼吴永刚. 内镜手术治疗泌乳素腺瘤52例分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 831-834.
[10]	张洪印贾学伟刘汉博 . 老年人上消化道穿孔应用开腹手术与腹腔镜联合胃镜治疗的疗效对比分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 849-851.
[11]	马人杰贺琦张海伟张俊华郑荣. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝的近期疗效及安全性观察[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(11): 862-864.
[12]	张文斌李翔. 手辅助腹腔镜在肥胖结直肠癌患者中的应用价值及疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 760-763.
[13]	陶海鹰喻剑舟卫爱林杨博杨俭. 后路椎板切除手术治疗脊柱椎管内神经鞘瘤的疗效分析[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2018, 26(10): 783-786.
[14]	詹惟李建波夏强等. 单操作孔全胸腔镜手术治疗胸部疾病78例体会 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(5): 385-386.
[15]	任德发牛晓泉郑刚等. 非选择性与选择性贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症并上消化道出血86例分析 [J]. 临床外科杂志, 2013, 21(4): 271-273.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed